Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young is the worst QB in Panthers History

dep

By dep,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Joe Bear Mentor

Joe Bear

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, CRA said:

I mean, I can give you a tip.  Trying to run with Mr Scot’s whack bologna ways ain’t the way bruh.  But you seem to be pretty invested given you keep stealing him lines as yours lol. 
 

 
 

 

Trying to double down on Bryce Derangement Syndrome ain't the way either, bruh. You and I both know if he signed with Dabo you'd be blaming everyone but him every Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TLGPanthersFan Grand Master

TLGPanthersFan

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, NAS said:

Bad take after this game where Bryce performed well given a nonexistent running game 

It doesn't change the fact Bryce is a bad QB and next season if he starts will once again bring the offense down to his level. which is 160 yards a game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, NAS said:

Bad take after this game where Bryce performed well given a nonexistent running game 

It is on the offense to counter the obvious strategy of shutting our run game down. We know what that entails. We have three years in with one player that has been entrusted to handle this poo. It isn’t getting handled. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Joe Bear Mentor

Joe Bear

Posted
Posted
Just now, strato said:

It is on the offense to counter the obvious strategy of shutting our run game down. We know what that entails. We have three years in with one player that has been entrusted to handle this poo. It isn’t getting handled. 

So if the run game works it's because Bryce sucks but if the run game sucks it's because Bryce sucks?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, PadresPanthersFan said:

Bryce may not be the only reason we lost this game ( bone headed playcalling and the refs played a huge part) but hes been one of the biggest reasons this has been another losing season. 

In spite of that he is not the worst panthers qb. Pickles is in a league of his own

Well we had to deal with one single season of Clausen. We just likely finished the third season of his closest competitor. Who else, Weinke? 
How bad do you think the Clausen outrage would have been by year three? This poo is mild. But people are tired of beating our heads into a brick wall that many of us saw coming. 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PadresPanthersFan Experienced

PadresPanthersFan

Posted
Posted
34 minutes ago, strato said:

Well we had to deal with one single season of Clausen. We just likely finished the third season of his closest competitor. Who else, Weinke? 
How bad do you think the Clausen outrage would have been by year three? This poo is mild. But people are tired of beating our heads into a brick wall that many of us saw coming. 

I'll give Bryce a mulligan for his first season under reich bc that season was a 💩 show. The end of last season gave false hope ( more than Jimmy ever did) but he's been average or mediocre overall his entire career. He does not make the team better. I hope they spend the offseason looking for someone who does

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Montsta Proficient

Montsta

Posted
Posted
47 minutes ago, Joe Bear said:

So if the run game works it's because Bryce sucks but if the run game sucks it's because Bryce sucks?

I mean Bryce sucks and other teams game plan extensively around the fact that Bryce sucks. So while it sounds like bias, yes, the run game sucks because of Bryce and when it works it works IN SPITE of Bryce. 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      That's it. How do you feel about this draft class.

      By strato · Posted

      I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • ForJimmy
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • tukafan21
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...