Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young is the worst QB in Panthers History


dep
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, TN05 said:

the one miss at 20 was the Legette drop.
 

image.png.485009dd9adfc37a78273e57b0a9f016.png

@mrcompletely11here is his chart from yesterday. It’s not the typically bad ones we see when he plays poorly. Granted Tampa’s pass defense is bad but he wasn’t the reason we lost yesterday IMO. There are plenty of games where he is and I’m fine with trying a different option. Using half a decade to see if a player can be your QB seems kind of crazy…

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Joe Bear said:

Trying to double down on Bryce Derangement Syndrome ain't the way either, bruh. You and I both know if he signed with Dabo you'd be blaming everyone but him every Sunday.

Missed this one.

If Bryce played for Dabo….I’m pretty sure I would talk about him in the EXACT same manner I did DJU.  You know, when I called out the worst absolute worst QB play in all the ACC.  I mean, you can find those posts here on the huddle if you were to go looking.   So yeah, I don’t do something different with “my college team”.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

@mrcompletely11here is his chart from yesterday. It’s not the typically bad ones we see when he plays poorly. Granted Tampa’s pass defense is bad but he wasn’t the reason we lost yesterday IMO. There are plenty of games where he is and I’m fine with trying a different option. Using half a decade to see if a player can be your QB seems kind of crazy…

Bryce frequently is given passes on subpar plays because in the fourth he throws one pass against cover zero on fourth and inches when the defense is exhausted to get the team into field goal range. And the usual suspects will fall all over themselves hand waving the first 50 minutes because of the 55 yard game winning fg he was able to “manufacture”.

meanwhile, any other part of the team messes up once (ickey a few weeks ago getting pushed back) and that ONE play in the reason the panthers lost.

bryce was unproductive against a very bad, injured secondary. He vanished for most of the game. He had one horrible interception, and was involved in a mystery fumble we don’t understand yet. And this was a game where he had very good protection. And he got a gift TD from his defense.

a million things happen in a football game. There is one position that most frequently has the ability to outperform it all and impact the game. Bryce is the reason teams can play them a certain way because he can’t overcome it.

he is the reason they lost yesterday. 

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if he wasn’t statistically the worst QB, to me he is the least fun QB to watch play.  It just isn’t fun knowing on 3 and long you’re going to get a 2 yard pass.  I think that is why Dave goes for it so much on 4th down, he knows it takes BY 4 drives to move the ball 10 yards 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Candler Cat said:

 

dcd17b8b5aba8c7e8be80dc77eae9fbf.jpg

Lol. I should AI a picture of him with 6” long toes. Standing on them. 
 

 I recently decided we need to redo our OL with a height limit. 6 feet and under so junior can see and maybe function like a normal player. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

@mrcompletely11here is his chart from yesterday. It’s not the typically bad ones we see when he plays poorly. Granted Tampa’s pass defense is bad but he wasn’t the reason we lost yesterday IMO. There are plenty of games where he is and I’m fine with trying a different option. Using half a decade to see if a player can be your QB seems kind of crazy…

I never said he was the reason but he didnt play all that great.  Especially in the first half.  Just heard that for the last nine weeks we have one of the worst rushing attacks in the nfl.  Teams have figured us/bryce out.  I mean the data is right there in front of us.   It will be interesting to see how they address things come Feb but you are correct it shouldnt take this long wondering what you have at qb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I never said he was the reason but he didnt play all that great.  Especially in the first half.  Just heard that for the last nine weeks we have one of the worst rushing attacks in the nfl.  Teams have figured us/bryce out.  I mean the data is right there in front of us.   It will be interesting to see how they address things come Feb but you are correct it shouldnt take this long wondering what you have at qb

Those two big running games came against two of the worst defenses in the league, one historically bad in Dallas. That said, it’s been cover one agains the offense ever since. And bryce still can’t make defenses lay. It’s maddening.

where are all those people screaming to extend Rico now, btw

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clausen got 1 year in a lame duck season and wasn't even a 1st round pick.  Clausen is in the same group of guys like Kyle Allen, Chris Weinke, and Taylor Heineke.  They were never committed to beyond 1 season basically.

Bryce got 3 years.  That makes him in his own league for this award.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

@mrcompletely11here is his chart from yesterday. It’s not the typically bad ones we see when he plays poorly. Granted Tampa’s pass defense is bad but he wasn’t the reason we lost yesterday IMO. There are plenty of games where he is and I’m fine with trying a different option. Using half a decade to see if a player can be your QB seems kind of crazy…

That’s not so bad. Still an awful lot of inside 5 yard stuff. I’d like to see an overlay of all of them.  All 16 weeks he played.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, electro's horse said:

Bryce frequently is given passes on subpar plays because in the fourth he throws one pass against cover zero on fourth and inches when the defense is exhausted to get the team into field goal range. And the usual suspects will fall all over themselves hand waving the first 50 minutes because of the 55 yard game winning fg he was able to “manufacture”.

meanwhile, any other part of the team messes up once (ickey a few weeks ago getting pushed back) and that ONE play in the reason the panthers lost.

bryce was unproductive against a very bad, injured secondary. He vanished for most of the game. He had one horrible interception, and was involved in a mystery fumble we don’t understand yet. And this was a game where he had very good protection. And he got a gift TD from his defense.

a million things happen in a football game. There is one position that most frequently has the ability to outperform it all and impact the game. Bryce is the reason teams can play them a certain way because he can’t overcome it.

he is the reason they lost yesterday. 

Literally 5 posts after you, one of suspects shows up loll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, strato said:

That’s not so bad. Still an awful lot of inside 5 yard stuff. I’d like to see an overlay of all of them.  All 16 weeks he played.  

What your going to find is exactly what the commentators said yesterday. He isn't comfortable throwing over the middle of the field. J stew said on his podcast, you have to be able to attack the middle of the field or it's hard to win games. Think about that does to an offense that can't attack the middle of the field. It cuts off 1/3 of the routes that we and tes run.  Now on top of that add bad footwork and floating passes and you get what we have

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, carolinanimal said:

What your going to find is exactly what the commentators said yesterday. He isn't comfortable throwing over the middle of the field. J stew said on his podcast, you have to be able to attack the middle of the field or it's hard to win games. Think about that does to an offense that can't attack the middle of the field. It cuts off 1/3 of the routes that we and tes run.  Now on top of that add bad footwork and floating passes and you get what we have

Oh yeah. Can’t see to throw in the middle.  
Those throws to the sidelines are scary too. So much air under them. It’s closing time for defenders.  
 

I hope we get rid of him. I doubt we will. I hope I can find a replacement passion/hobby for all the time I won’t be spending following the NFL. It is a lifelong addiction and hard to kick.  

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...