Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jenson's OTB: Panthers Source on Edwards, Clausen


mav1234

Recommended Posts

It's funny because during the Bustin Loose show today, I heard Moose say he had sources within the Panthers organization who say that Clausen's inability to grasp the offensive scheme caused them to have to really limit the offense last year and they are definitely looking for someone else to be the starting QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Screw Cam. He is not even on the team. I would like to point out that, although skeptical, I hope this is correct about Clausen. I am taking the approach that Clausen and Edwards were not Fox choices, that they went over his head due to his lame duck status, that he knew they weren't drafted for him, so he resented them. There was a time during the season when Fox told reporters, "JC will be the starting QB the rest of the year." He never says something like that when a player was struggling. He was told to play Clausen.

Clausen was not groomed or even protected. He was thrown to the lions. Now, maybe he is a dud, but anyone who pronounces him dead is a quitter. Like I said earlier, Elway's rookie year was nearly identical to Clausen's, except he didn't have to play under these conditions. 47% completion rate and a 54 QB rating in 10 games as a starter. He has 2 rings and a bust in the hall today. Denver wanted him out.

they also invested a poo ton into him to get him there. I know the colts originally drafted him and the broncos traded away a bunch of crap to get him, so they had too much invested for him to fail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's funny because during the Bustin Loose show today, I heard Moose say he had sources within the Panthers organization who say that Clausen's inability to grasp the offensive scheme caused them to have to really limit the offense last year and they are definitely looking for someone else to be the starting QB.

jesus christ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's funny because during the Bustin Loose show today, I heard Moose say he had sources within the Panthers organization who say that Clausen's inability to grasp the offensive scheme caused them to have to really limit the offense last year and they are definitely looking for someone else to be the starting QB.

What does Moose know? ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's funny because during the Bustin Loose show today, I heard Moose say he had sources within the Panthers organization who say that Clausen's inability to grasp the offensive scheme caused them to have to really limit the offense last year and they are definitely looking for someone else to be the starting QB.

What do you think the odds are that particular source goes by the initials "SS"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People are misunderstanding the so-called asking price for Palmer. It isn't a swap and 4th rounder.

It is a 1st round pick and a third or fourth.

In other words, if you want Palmer and a swap this year it would take something along the lines of swapping picks this year, next years first, and this/next year's 3rd/4th.

To me this is too high a price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People are misunderstanding the so-called asking price for Palmer. It isn't a swap and 4th rounder.

It is a 1st round pick and a third or fourth.

In other words, if you want Palmer and a swap this year it would take something along the lines of swapping picks this year, next years first, and this/next year's 3rd/4th.

To me this is too high a price.

Wrong. Jensen's source said they'd want a first round pick paired with a 3rd or 4th. Swapping picks in the first and giving them a 4th would fit that scenario if Brown were willing to trade.

It's also not absolutely necessary that the whole trade be completed on draft day if the CBA is not in place. They can make a "handshake" agreement that they'll trade Palmer when they can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wrong. Jensen's source said they'd want a first round pick paired with a 3rd or 4th. Swapping picks in the first and giving them a 4th would fit that scenario if Brown were willing to trade.

It's also not absolutely necessary that the whole trade be completed on draft day if the CBA is not in place. They can make a "handshake" agreement that they'll trade Palmer when they can.

That just doesn't seem like it's enough for their franchise QB. They could probably get more to be honest. I hope it's true though(your trade scenario that is). I would make that trade without hesitation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wrong. Jensen's source said they'd want a first round pick paired with a 3rd or 4th. Swapping picks in the first and giving them a 4th would fit that scenario if Brown were willing to trade.

It's also not absolutely necessary that the whole trade be completed on draft day if the CBA is not in place. They can make a "handshake" agreement that they'll trade Palmer when they can.

That isn't what he said. He asked the guy in Cincy what it would take to get palmer and the guy in Cincy said at least a 1st round pick and a 3rd/4th.

Then somehow the hosts started talking about swapping picks and a 4th but that wasn't what the guy's source in Cincy said.

They may have misread what the guy said but it will take no less than a stand alone first round pick and an additional pick to get Palmer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...