Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Newton might have critics, but some say Gabbert isn't special


mav1234

Recommended Posts

Steve Wyche has a piece up on NFL.com on Gabbert (and a bit on Newton):

I've recently spoken to scouts and coaches who simply haven't been blown away by Gabbert. In their film evaluation of Gabbert, I was told there is just nothing special that jumps out. He's good. Nobody is saying he can't play. It's just that typically, a top quarterback takes over a game or two, leads some signature drives and, at times, looks like the best player on the field, one person said. You just don't see that with Gabbert, he added.

When I asked if Gabbert's 16 touchdowns to nine interceptions was problematic, I was told many talent evaluators aren't looking at it closely. The feeling is there are a variety of reasons why touchdown numbers could be low, or that interception numbers could be unimpressive.

...

I have yet to be told that Gabbert and Newton don't project to be great players. No one has that crystal ball. I'm regularly told that each has tremendous upside and the skills to function at a high level for years. That, frankly, might be enough for most teams. Although if teams draft a quarterback in the top 10, they want him to produce -- or at least show signs of it -- right away.

As one coach said, "That's what we're here for. To coach them up and make them better."

The varied opinions on Gabbert and Newton are very interesting. They are really all over the place, and it's what makes this so different than the recent drafts. Opinions on Matt Ryan, Joe Flacco, Matthew Stafford, Sam Bradford, Mark Sanchez and even Josh Freeman were all for the most part favorable leading up to the draft. That was especially true with with Stafford and Bradford, the first overall picks in their respective drafts.

You just have to wonder that if Gabbert or Newton were in the draft with any of those players - or even if Stanford's Andrew Luck had entered this draft -- if either would be under consideration as a top-10 pick.

http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/09000d5d81f09839/article/newton-might-have-critics-but-some-say-gabbert-isnt-special?module=HP_cp2

No real surprises there, and all part of the reason neither should go #1. Though I personally thought that Gabbert breaking the back of the Sooners in the 4th quarter with two touchdowns drives was kinda nice, but he didn't do it alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have yet to be told that Gabbert and Newton don't project to be great players. No one has that crystal ball. I'm regularly told that each has tremendous upside and the skills to function at a high level for years. That, frankly, might be enough for most teams. Although if teams draft a quarterback in the top 10, they want him to produce -- or at least show signs of it -- right away.

You just have to wonder that if Gabbert or Newton were in the draft with any of those players - or even if Stanford's Andrew Luck had entered this draft -- if either would be under consideration as a top-10 pick.

These are the parts that I liked more than anything. Everybody on all sides of the argument needs to read this article.

The point that I take away from reading that is that neither one is a home run pick, but that both have the potential to be one. It seems that most posters in the QB threads view it one of three ways, a) QB1 is a sure fire home run and QB2 sucks balls, b) both QBs suck donkey balls or c) fug it Jimmy sucks, we have to draft one of them.

Both A and B are categorically wrong. Both Cam and Gabbert are good QB prospects at this point, both have the potential to be very good NFL QBs but neither are slam dunk picks. (And yes, there have been slam dunk QBs coming our of college.)

Option C is a perfectly valid opinion, it is just one that I don't happen to share. I think we still have potential in our current QB corps. I don't see the need to spend the number 1 pick on a position when we don't even know what we have there already. We know we have jackpoo at DT and there is a guy sitting right there who is as much of a slam dunk as any DT (excluding Suh) coming out in recent memory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Newton has the potential to be special. I don't see that at all in Gabbert. If the choice is between those two, I can't imagine why any team would choose the guy with less potential just because he is viewed as "safer."

I'd rather swing for the fences and strike out than hit the ball 5 feet. At least if Cam is a bust we'll know within 3-4 years and can move on. If Gabbert turns out to be Kyle Orton then we're almost stuck with him for the next decade, having invested the 1st overall pick in a guy we can't win a SB with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you even watched him play? I seriously don't know how anyone can watch this guy on the field and say such a thing. I can understand if you don't think he's the right pick, but the guy has dominated every level he's played at and has all the physical tools to do so in the NFL as well.

A side show act? Hardly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you even watched him play? I seriously don't know how anyone can watch this guy on the field and say such a thing. I can understand if you don't think he's the right pick, but the guy has dominated every level he's played at and has all the physical tools to do so in the NFL as well.

A side show act? Hardly.

I've been saying this guy isn't a 1st round QB all off-season. I literally can not understand how he is even in the consideration for #1. Before Luck wen't back he wasn't even in the conversation in the 1st round (probably not even in the 2nd). I was debating whether we should take Newton over Luck because I believe he has more upside (I still would have went Luck but its not like Newton came out of nowhere). Gabbert just doesn't impress me where it counts, on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Same. I would prefer a MNF game earlier in the season. As if more likely has some significance in case things go south this season. If we perform well enough we could even get another game forced to a Sunday night spot later in the season. 
    • Wanted to jump into this thread. Although I do not post anymore I do look in as there are a few old friends around. Loved hearing some of the names you mentioned.  Another  oldie is NanceUSMC.  He is the one who got me here from the old Observer forum.  Good guy and smart football guy. I have learned a lot from a lot of good Huddlers over the years, Over time. we have sadly lost a few who left this earth too soon.  Anyone who know of someone, it would be nice to try to make a list.  One of the more recent, CosmoGirl,  was someone that kind of hit hard.  Life sucks sometimes. Some of the best times were when we had our own tailgate and could meet up in person.  I think it made us better. Several dedicated volunteers, lead by LiverMush, started setting things up in the wee hours of each gameday morning.  Don't know all those regulars but I remember JakeFlake was one.  For you newbies...each game,  a Huddler (or a group) sponsored the food for each tailgate.  Eating was free but a donation was asked for.  At the end of the year those donations were used to buy bicycles for Toys for Tots.  Over the years Huddlers bought a lot of new bikes for kids for Christmas.  (I am guessing a couple of hundred each year.)  We had a good time getting together, got to make friends in person, and then got to feel like you were doing something good. It was truly a community. I got to meet Dan Morgan at one of our tailgates...he brought pizza from his restaurant.  How many of you remember that?  Glad the restaurant did not make it....lol. Not only have people changed, and come and gone.....but the entire nature and purpose has changed. Nothing lasts forever and we move on but we still like to think about good times. Same reason we take pictures. Want to ask a question I have not seen anyone else mention......who remembers    "The Couch" ?  We have argued, laughed, lived the ups and downs of football and dealt with a little real life along the way.  A thanks to  the Mods who keep this going.  I am sure they sacrifice a lot of their time out of love for the forum and the Panthers. Take care my friends and be well.  I will close with my new favorite quote which I think is greatly needed in these difficult times.        
    • My top-5 JAGS: 1. Tommy Tremble: May not ever be top-tier, but has been solid and you never doubt the effort. 2. Cade Mays: Not bad for a 6th rounder. Hated to see him go. 3. Brady Christensen: One of the most versatile backup OLs in the NFL. Hopefully we re-sign him. 4. Trevis Gipson: Quietly was really solid depth last season. Glad we brought him back. 5. Brycen Tremayne: Has been solid depth at WR, flashing at times last year.
×
×
  • Create New...