Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chud's Bible (Playbook)


Recommended Posts

The National Football Post reports new Panthers OC Rob Chudzinski’s playbook is roughly 900 pages in length.

As a result, Post writer Dan Pompei believes the Panthers would be forced to do "some serious dumbing down" of their offense if they draft Cam Newton. It's hard to believe any quarterback could ever fully grasp a 900-page playbook, but it would be next to impossible for a rookie. Maybe Chudzinski should take this as an opportunity to do some much needed simplifying.

Source: National Football Post Apr 17, 8:48 AM

With a 900 page playbook, can any quarterback actually play and/or want to play for the Panthers. Only a handful of guys off the top of my head such as Manning, Luck, and Ponder would have the desire, will, and knowledge to learn a 900 page playbook.

What do you guys think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The transition from college to pros at QB is the thing the people on this board seem to know the least about. Chud has earned respect in the league by using his playbook--not simplifying it. If he has to cut, simplify, and add pictures, we get another Davidson.

With the real possibility of not having an off season or preseason, why would you draft a QB who has 14 games of D-1 as a starter in a simple offense? Drafting Newton makes no sense unless you are agreeing to tank the season for the long-term hope that he becomes great, and Hurney said that only 44% of first overall QBs drafted since 1998 became consistent starters--not pro bowlers--starters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The transition from college to pros at QB is the thing the people on this board seem to know the least about. Chud has earned respect in the league by using his playbook--not simplifying it. If he has to cut, simplify, and add pictures, we get another Davidson.

With the real possibility of not having an off season or preseason, why would you draft a QB who has 14 games of D-1 as a starter in a simple offense? Drafting Newton makes no sense unless you are agreeing to tank the season for the long-term hope that he becomes great, and Hurney said that only 44% of first overall QBs drafted since 1998 became consistent starters--not pro bowlers--starters.

WAIT WAIT WAIT WAIT WAIT...

..His playbook doesn't have PICTURES either?

This is Chud's first job as an OC and his first playbook to my knowledge. Essentially it does not matter who the Panthers QB is, because every QB would have to learn the playbook. My question is more directed to the fact that; can anyone learn this giant playbook?

Second job as an O.C. >.>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

900 plays is a little ridiculous...he's going to have to drastically reduce that for whoever plays QB...not just newton

It's 900 pages, and no, it's certainly not "ridiculous" by any stretch.

Chud could have a bigger impact on who we draft number one than any of us think.

If he doesn't think Cammy Cam and his juice are smart enough to grasp the playbook, we could very well see us go another route because of who Chud wants behind center.

Chud's offense requires intelligence. Certainly not Cam's strong suit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its probably just variations and sets of very similar plays.

Its probably 50 or 60, at most 100 plays, ran out of different formations and different motions. And each page probably represents these plays. Also, it is probably different plays playing to different QB's strengths. IE. If we drafted Newton, as opposed to a Mallet type.

And it take ANY QB several year to fully grasp ANY playbook.

I wouldn't look too much into it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any rook is going to struggle with NFL playbooks, especially Norv Turner/Chuds.

There is a ton of motions, formations, who is the hot read on certain plays etc.

I have no doubt that every QB in this draft would struggle with it no matter what.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As said before 900 is not all that uncommon. I dont think him or any OC would expect a QB to grasp the whole playbook in 3 months. Not even Manning could do that. Why do you think people say it takes 3 years for most OCs to install there system with a team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's say we have a LT for 2026, because we do.  After that, let's say we Ickey could be back and we would have the option of extending Walker.   Don't get me wrong--I LOVE drafting OL.  Teams obviously get desperate for OTs and if they enter the draft without 2 solid tackles, they are almost obligated to reach for a first round OT.  This year, I see 1 OT who is probably worth first-round consideration, and I am not putting him in the top 10 players in the draft.  Lomu, Freeling, Miller, and Proctor, for example, probably and arguably have second-round value.  So why would you reach for an OT in round 1 when you already have starters at both T positions but you have other needs? We do need depth, however, and I think there is decent OT depth that needs development on day 3. They are no slouches, by the way.   Drew Shelton (could drop to round 4): Surrendered 1 sack as Penn State's LT in 2025. 33 3/8" arms.  Pass pro improved every year (4 years--experienced).  "For a team running a zone-heavy scheme that values lateral movement and reach-blocking ability over phone-booth mauling, Shelton has real appeal. He is not a plug-and-play starter, but the athletic tools and the clear year-over-year improvement suggest a player who can develop into a capable starter if a coaching staff invests in his strength base and cleans up his technique. The ceiling depends entirely on how much stronger he can get and whether his feet can stay alive after initial contact."   Austin Barber  (could drop to round 4): I see him as a RT at best and a probable kick inside to Guard where his strengths would switch from secondary to primary tools.  Considering Lewis and Hunt may be gone in a year or two, this would give the Panthers a chance to work him at RT and then move him inside if he is not effective, and there is confidence that G may be his best position. Jude Bowery (4th round projection) was LT on a Boston College OL that was effective in the run game.  Bowery is one of the most athletic OTs in the draft.  His arms are not ideal but not too short (33.75") to play LT.  He surrendered 2 sacks. He is raw, and needs some technical refinement with his hands.  I think he has the best upside and value for this offense.   Dametrious Crownover  TexAM (5th round projection; 35 3/8" arms) is one of the more fascinating developmental tackles in this class because the physical tools are legitimately rare. A strong run blocker who should be better in pass protection with his tools.  "You do not find many 6-7, 336-pound men with that foot speed and who have the athletic background of a converted tight end. When everything clicks, he looks like a starting right tackle in a gap-heavy run scheme, smothering defenders at the point of attack and using his length to erase speed off the edge. The 2024 tape, when he anchored one of the best rushing attacks in the SEC, is the version of Crownover that gets offensive line coaches excited."  THIS is the kind of player our coaches could develop until Moton is done. What made World intriguing coming out of Eugene was the untapped ceiling, a fifth-year transfer who arrived as the top-ranked offensive tackle in the portal and looked the part for stretches. The improvement he showed against Big Ten competition in his one Oregon season was real, and the physical foundation, length, athleticism, and improving technique in pass protection, is still there. The ACL tear suffered in the College Football Playoff semifinal against Indiana doesn't erase that, but it changes the conversation significantly. The injury clouds the immediate projection. Most ACL recoveries for offensive linemen run nine to twelve months, which means World is likely unavailable for meaningful action well into his rookie season at the earliest. The combine absence removes his chance to reset the narrative physically, and teams will be making decisions almost entirely off pre-injury film and medical evaluations. The contrast between his polished pass sets and his inconsistent run blocking was already a developmental concern, and now those technique issues get deferred further while he rehabs. Isaiah World  (Oregon, injured ACL in playoffs, 5th round projection--could slide to 6th).  World will not play much if at all in 2026, which is why he might fall.  For the Panthers' purposes, however, this would give the OL coaches time to work with him. "What made World intriguing coming out of Eugene was the untapped ceiling, a fifth-year transfer who arrived as the top-ranked offensive tackle in the portal and looked the part for stretches. The improvement he showed against Big Ten competition in his one Oregon season was real, and the physical foundation, length, athleticism, and improving technique in pass protection, is still there. The ACL tear suffered in the College Football Playoff semifinal against Indiana doesn't erase that, but it changes the conversation significantly." "That said, the investment argument isn't crazy for the right organization. This is still a tackle with first-round portal grades and the kind of athletic profile that doesn't just disappear. A team with patience and a strong offensive line room can afford to stash World on the roster, let him develop his lower-body power and pad-level consistency during the recovery process, and potentially unlock a starting-caliber right tackle somewhere in his second or third season. The path is longer now, but the destination hasn't changed for a scout willing to bet on the physical tools." You get the idea. If we do not need the OT immediately, draft one later and develop him as depth and for next season.  Most college players drafted in round 1 were not first rounders if they had entered the draft the year before,  so why not grab a player with upside?      
    • Its never the QBs fault, so if we get a new WR and he looks bad he must be a bust
    • Based on what? Its certainly not his in game coaching prowess. 
×
×
  • Create New...