Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina a potential landing spot for Mebane?


KillerKat

Recommended Posts

So he had 31 tackles and 1 sack in 2010. Why would we pay big bucks to pick him up when Landri had better numbers than that with 43 tackles and 3 sacks. I would want an upgrade which I am not sure he is. There is a reason Seattle isn't resigning him.

your placing a hell of a lot of emphasis on stats.

If the line was that blurry between Landri and Mebane then why isn't Landri seen as a top FA? Why were we able to pick him up for peanuts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

your placing a hell of a lot of emphasis on stats.

If the line was that blurry between Landri and Mebane then why isn't Landri seen as a top FA? Why were we able to pick him up for peanuts?

Right--Landri is more of a one-trick pony. He penetrates well vs. run blocking by shooting through gaps, but doesn't get same results vs. the pass and cannot get a push.

I still think Landri could do very well in our defense. I would keep him.

Mebane is not bad, but Cofield is who we (rumor) seek. I hear we will go after Cofield hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

your placing a hell of a lot of emphasis on stats.

If the line was that blurry between Landri and Mebane then why isn't Landri seen as a top FA? Why were we able to pick him up for peanuts?

What do you think matters if it isn't numbers?? Some magical evaluation based on what you observe devoid of any facts?? The old, forget the numbers, I saw it, so that trumps all the numbers.

I wonder how that works at contract time when a player says ignore the nimbers, I played really great in spite of all the evidence to the contrary. Doesn't sound that Seattle bought it and I wouldn't either.

And really who says Mebane is a great free agent pickup. Seattle doesn't even want him.

Landri is not that great and that is the point. Mebane can't even put up better numbers compared to a run of the mill DT and people are slobbering over him. He is not that good or worth much money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you think matters if it isn't numbers?? Some magical evaluation based on what you observe devoid of any facts?? The old, forget the numbers, I saw it, so that trumps all the numbers.

I wonder how that works at contract time when a player says ignore the nimbers, I played really great in spite of all the evidence to the contrary. Doesn't sound that Seattle bought it and I wouldn't either.

And really who says Mebane is a great free agent pickup. Seattle doesn't even want him.

Landri is not that great and that is the point. Mebane can't even put up better numbers compared to a run of the mill DT and people are slobbering over him. He is not that good or worth much money.

I don't see much slobbering, but please enlighten us on who ya want bud rather than telling us who we most definitely cannot get!! :gnorsi:

It seems most people still prefer Cofield as mentioned in this and many other threads. So again, who do you want?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right--Landri is more of a one-trick pony. He penetrates well vs. run blocking by shooting through gaps, but doesn't get same results vs. the pass and cannot get a push.

I still think Landri could do very well in our defense. I would keep him.

Mebane is not bad, but Cofield is who we (rumor) seek. I hear we will go after Cofield hard.

Landri is better than you portray. For a DT, 3 sacks and 45 tackles is a good season particularly on a crappy team like ours last year playing in a poor scheme.

Landri is a 3 technique tackle which is why we picked him up. His job is to shoot the gaps and penetrate. He did a decent job against the pass. Most tackles not named Suh doesn't get double digit sacks from the tackle position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see much slobbering, but please enlighten us on who ya want bud rather than telling us who we most definitely cannot get!! :gnorsi:

It seems most people still prefer Cofield as mentioned in this and many other threads. So again, who do you want?

I already said Cofield would be a good pickup because he can play the NT position, what are you rambling about. As for Mebane he isn't better than who we already have. Given that free agency hasn't started and we don't even know who will be available, it is hard to make a defintive list of who we should get when we don't know who will even hit free agency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I only used it because it’s being said he can’t.  I’ve said this 100 times already but these deep passes people get obsessed with are much more on the WR than the QB. If Burrow throws a bomb to Chase and he is either wide open or makes a catch in tight coverage those both are more WR plays than QB to me.  Bryce has shown many flaws but I don’t think throwing the ball 20 yards to a player in coverage is something he or any NFL QB can’t do. He just gets sloppy under pressure and tries some Mahomes type backfoot throws that do require elite arm strength in which he does not have. 
    • Again with the straw man arguments. You have Trump level of delusions about this subject.  Here, let me do you in this case.... I don't know if AT fuged your girl or your wife or whatever but your level of hatred towards a guy not even on the team is insane. I can't believe you keep hate watching all these Vikings games as a result. It's crazy behavior but, by all means, you do you.   Now...see how nutty that sounds? Go read this thread and see how emotional you are over something no one in this thread is talking about emotionally. 
×
×
  • Create New...