Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Richard Marshall


Snake

Recommended Posts

Yeah I think he will be a good corner. He seems very physical and I think he will be able to help in run support. But he does seem to try for the home run a lot and will put himself in bad position. I do like a guy who will jump a route and get the interception but we all know that jumping a route will get you burned or leave someone wide open.

Pick your poison I guess. All in all he should be a solid corner for years to come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he could be great he could also about kill us in some games, he was our most willing DB as far as jumping a route for a INT goes, but the bad side to that is he will also jump a route causing more chances for a deep shot down field, but as the saying goes, nothing ventured nothing gained.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

meeks made jason david look good i think he work wonders with marshall

hopefully marshall's regression this year wasn't anything we need to worry about, I'm interested to see how godrey will perform as well with a second year of experience

I've also decided that Alphonso Smith is my guy, if we draft a corner i hope it's him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For a reason Marshall is a real good corner when he is defending the side line but not so when he is covering the slot receiver....

In his rookie when he subing in Nickel package, Gamble always handle the slot guy...Now because he is replacing Lucas I at the side line I think he is going to have a decent year....

All the plays that are remember from last year that he has beaten was in the middle of the field. The reason may be was size, athletism, it was like 2 cm more and he would deflect the pass...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marshall can be very good. Alot of how his play went last year depended on the safeties' play and there was a rookie back there. If he starts, he'd better be prepared for a ton of balls thrown his way. :o I hope Meeks & crew can successfully teach him more of the basics and how to better read the offenses, IMO that's what he's missing. To use his speed to his advantage.

But remember that Gamble played the same way in his first 2 years, going for the interception more often than he probably should have, getting burned alot. Now he's as solid as on oak door. :)

I just hope they find another speedster willing to give up his body to make the stop to replace him on ST.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marshall has great speed but isn't really anything to fear for throwing the ball in his direction. I'd rather throw at him then Gamble for sure.

Guess the starting role will be the ultimate test to how he can translate on the field, seemed like he had good stamina, acceleration, and a decent jam off the line when I seen him. He's not as good as Aqib Talib but he's a upgrade from Ken Lucas for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What you are saying isn't always true and I'll give you several examples to demonstrate this. 1) The best player on the board at the end of in round 1 by all consensus is RB (top 15 player in draft who slips b/c of the devaluation of the RB position). Your team is in desperate need of a LT because the current one is getting your QB killed. You already have a serviceable RB in place. The LT has a 2nd round grade and you have the first pick on day 2 of the draft Who do you choose? 2) Your run defense was abysmal the previous season. A DT in round 2 does not provide much in terms of pass rush, but most reports have him rated as the best pure run stuffing DT in the draft. The two highest rated players on your board at the time are a TE and tweener at OLB/DE who slipped into round 2 after a run on WR's. Who do you choose? 3) Your pass rush rush is solid across the board. You even have guy coming off of the bench to provide production. Your secondary in below average. No Safety on the roster is a difference maker and as a unit the squad doesn't have an INT. The highest rated player on the board is a DE. The 5th highest rated player on the board is a an intelligent ball hawking Safety. Which player would make the team immediately better?  1) I think the BPA logic applies when your team is solid across the board and you can afford to draft for depth 2) I think it also applies when your team stinks and any solid player will be an immediate upgrade over what you already have. I agree that you should NEVER reach for a player when you are need at a position like we did for Bryce Young. But I also think if there's is a player on the board that will fill a glaring weakness you need to take him even if a player with a higher over all ranking is available at another position (which isn't a need)  
    • Bryce Young excels at dividing Panthers fans. That seems to be what he's best at.
    • 184 yards game, 61% completion 11 tds 5ints    thats ranks :check notes:  25th in the nfl
×
×
  • Create New...