Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Total Meltdown Scenario... presented by WFNZ

L-TownCat

By L-TownCat,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

unicar15 Experienced

unicar15

Posted
Posted

Nope...Shock and Moss are completely different players in every aspect of the game. I believe this team NEEDS Jeremy Shockey not just for his ability to catch the ball but because he brings an edge. Randy brings no edge. Other than Shockey and Steve Smith on offense who has a mean streak? You don't want to get rid of that when you still have a young QB. Gotta have the older guys who won't back down from going over the middle and will lay a defender out if they are bearing down on the franchise QB. Moss would leave Cam out to dry and we'd lose a blocker for the run game...rather have Shockey right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
L-TownCat Grand Master

L-TownCat

Posted
  • Author
Posted

haha i would be fine with that. I feel that barnidge could replace shock and ive always liked moss

Moss helped me win my first fantasy championship when he went to the pats but Im really just completely over the barnidge experiment. Coulda woulda shoulda, plus he doesnt have the same fire or leadership ability as Shock. Sorry Moss but i love me some shock. no homo

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

Moss brings nothing to the table for us at this point. We already have 2 deep threats in Gettis and Smith. We hae a possession receiver in LaFell and could better use a slot receiver like Welker versus a Moss. As for Shockey, he would be worth keeping if we could get him on a 2 year contract with little guaranteed money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wesmesss Newbie

Wesmesss

Posted
Posted

Moss brings nothing to the table for us at this point. We already have 2 deep threats in Bettis and Smith. We hae a possession receiver in LaFell and ccould better use a slot receiver like Welker versus a Moss. As for Shockey, he would be worth keeping if we could get him on a 2 year contract with little guaranteed money.

We signed Bettis?? THE BUS IS BACK!!

post-6897-133194788301_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fiz Newbie

Fiz

Posted
Posted

why are you people obsessed with either of these players?

Moss can no longer separate and was basically cut from three teams his last year in the league.

Jeremy Shockey can no longer separate from anything and is a glorified 6th lineman. The Panthers could easily replace his production with a late round blocking tight end.

but noooo something something attitude goo goo ga ga

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By strato · Posted

      Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • outlaw4
      Dan had a great draft

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • 45catfan
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By 45catfan · Posted

      I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...