Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tell what the thread is about in the title


panthers55

Recommended Posts

One of my pet peeves are posters who start threads with titles like:

Hey guys.........

I want to know....

I been wondering.........

You open up the thread to find out that the thread is about Chudzinski or a player or the salary cap.

Why not title the thread something like: Thoughts about Chudzinski's contract or I want to know about how the salary cap works.

And even those aren't great because you could have asked the question in a thread already started on the topic instead of asking a question in a new thread.

How about adding to the knowledge base instead of asking questions that have been discussed previously.

I am going to make it my policy to ignore threads that don't clearly state what they are about. If we all did that, they would quickly disappear.

Just my pet peeve that I feel better about after putting it out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of my pet peeves are posters who start threads with titles like:

Hey guys.........

I want to know....

I been wondering.........

You open up the thread to find out that the thread is about Chudzinski or a player or the salary cap.

Why not title the thread something like: Thoughts about Chudzinski's contract or I want to know about how the salary cap works.

And even those aren't great because you could have asked the question in a thread already started on the topic instead of asking a question in a new thread.

How about adding to the knowledge base instead of asking questions that have been discussed previously.

I am going to make it my policy to ignore threads that don't clearly state what they are about. If we all did that, they would quickly disappear.

Just my pet peeve that I feel better about after putting it out there.

1261611415087.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't mind so mouch when people do that in thread titles because I usually don't look at them anyway. What I do hate though is when the same people bitch at me for making a thread about something that has already been created in another thread but their other thread was titled something stupid so I have no idea it's already been discussed.

For example:

Huddler X sees that the Panthers traded for Greg Olsen and makes a thread titled "OMGZ!!!1!! Did you guys hear?!??" This person also provides a link as the first sentence, so even if I do a mouse-over of their thread title for a preview it gives absolutely no indication as to what the thread is about.

Montsta sees that the Panthers traded for Greg Olsen and makes a thread titled "The Panthers just traded a 3rd round pick for Greg Olsen"

Huddler X then comes into my thread and berates me because a thread already exists on that topic.

That is the dickhead move I don't like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would you just fuging quit trying to make us like him? That is his job, not yours.  Thank you. 
    • Rookie season being key to uour argument. I didn't at all mislead about the talent Cam had to work with. Kalil was a great center. Olsen was a great TE. Our WRs were probably the worst in the league. Cam still won MVP, we went 15-1, and we went to the SB. Your attempt to bring up Cam to defend Bryce is desperate and clownish. Bryce has more talent to work with and has done WAY less.
    • Not exactly sure that is an honest assesment of the talent he had to work with that year. Olsen had over 1100 yards that season making the PB, Stewart had close to 1100 total yards also going to the PB. He had Kalil at C who went to the PB, Trai Turner at RG who also went to the PB, and Michael Oher at LT who played well enough that the Panthers offered him a new contract the following year. I wouldn't call that a trash OL. He also played with a defense that was stacked with talent as well.   "The thing we are doing better this time around is actually surrounding our #1 overall draft pick QB with talent vs. asking him to completely carry the offense. I just hope that effort is leading us to realize that the guy isn't even good enough to get carried." Please.... Did you not read the list of names Newton had to work with his rookie season. I guess you missed it so I will post it again for you... Steve Smith (PB), Greg Olsen (PB), Brandon LaFell, Ted Ginn JR, Deangelo Williams (PB), Jonathan Stewart (PB), Jordan Grossn (PB), Ryan Kalil (PB) on the offensive side and then he had Luke Kuechly (PB), Jon Beason (PB), Thomas Davis (PB), Star Lotulelei, Kawann Short ( PB ),Charles Johnson, Greg Hardy (PB ), Mike Mitchell, Josh Norman (PB)  For comparison, here is who Young had his first year.  Chuba Hubbard, DJ Chark, Jonathan Mingo, Adam Thielen, Hayden Hurst, Ikem Ekwonu, Chandler Zavala, Bradley Bozeman, Nash Jensen and Taylor Morton. Not a single PB player on the list and most of them aren't even playing any longer. Additionally, his HC was fired during the season and the defense was as bad as the offense.  You might not like the comparison but saying Newton had to completely carry the offense isn't exactly fair to the 4 pro bowlers on offense who played with him that year.
×
×
  • Create New...