Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Don't be surprised when Carolina goes Offensive Line in the first..


Guest Bwood

Recommended Posts

Guest Bwood15

http://walterfootball.com/nfldraftrumormill.php

Panthers Could Opt For Tackle in First Round

Published Feb. 15, 2012

By Charlie Campbell - @draftcampbell

An interesting team to keep an eye on in the first round of the 2012 NFL Draft is the Carolina Panthers. After enjoying a rebound season led by star rookie quarterback Cam Newton, the Panthers appear to be on the up as they go into year two under head coach Ron Rivera. In 2011, Carolina produced big point totals on a weekly basis, but struggled to stop anyone on the defensive side of the ball. As a result, they lost a lot of high scoring shootouts.

With the defense being a clear weakness, many have penciled in the Panthers to focus on the defensive side of the football with their first-round pick. That is definitely possible as they could use help at cornerback and defensive tackle. Even though Carolina has a huge need to upgrade the talent of their defense, they also could pursue an offensive tackle.

Left tackle Jordan Gross turns 32 this year, and Carolina has to start thinking of his long-term replacement. Jeff Otah has had a two-year knee injury and his long-term future is in question. The Panthers are optimistic that they won't be picking in the top half of the draft over the next few years, and they know that landing a franchise left tackle is very difficult to do in the later half of the first round. As a result, Carolina will consider Iowa tackle Riley Reiff and Stanford tackle Jonathan Martin.

Reiff is the more polished pass protector, while Martin is a much better run blocker. Right now, many believe that Reiff won't make to the Panthers pick at No. 8 or 9, but a lot can change in leading up the draft. Martin could start his career on the right side for Carolina and move over to left tackle after Gross calls it a career. If Carolina opts to pass on Martin or Reiff, they'll have a hole at tackle for years to come. Therefore, even though they badly need defensive help, this may be the time for them to add an offensive tackle who can protect Cam Newton through the prime years of his career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Reiff falls to us, I think it becomes a toss up between him and Brockers/Hot defensive name. No way we go Decastro IMO that early, and only way he comes here is if we somehow trade back to get him. I wouldn't be mad with a Reiff pick, dependent on what happens in FA and our other picks in the draft. I mean, the Pats, Packers, and Giants all showed you don't have to have elite defenses to go far. We're going to have a great offense, just need to have a respectable to decent defense that can force some TO's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been saying this for awhile, that the value presented us at the 8/9 pick will most likely be on one side of the line or the other.

Would love to trade down a few spots and then pick up a Brockers, DeCastro or OT which would be much more in line with their value

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surprised? I've been saying this for months. I think Decastro will be the pick maybe Reiff if hes there.

Me too. I want Brockers, but maybe this is the smart pick. I do not think DeCastro, however. If we go G, which is pretty deep in this draft, it will be later. I even think Wharton could be cut for cap reasons, but we still have Schwartz or Bell at RG and Hangartner, Garry Williams, Ziemba etc who could play LG. If we are cutting Wharton, we have no real backup LT and Otah needs to change his position to IR. Even if Otah has a full season, are we going to pay him to return on a second contract? I doubt it.

You protect Cam Newton before you do anything else. I want Defense too, but you are drafting for the next 10 years, not just next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we haven't found a replacement for Smith, why do they think we're gonna get a replacement for Gross? I seriously doubt it.

I wonder if you are right or not because it seems certain key positions are ignored in the first round so we can take the safe pick. The best LTs are found in the early first round. We are not picking here again for a while. More teams have Offensive tackles listed as prioritized needs than WRs, even though most teams have twice as many WRs than they do Tackles.

But JT, I agree. WR has been neglected, like DT. --- we never replaced Kris Jenkins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right now, many believe that Reiff won't make to the Panthers pick at No. 8 or 9

The only team that could pick before us that might take him is Miami, the way I see it. I'd be pretty surprised if Reiff is gone when we pick. With that said, I'm just not a huge fan of either. If we pick one I won't hate it, but my preference for Brockers isn't even completely because of how good I think he'll be. I don't think either of those OTs will turn out to be great players and worth the pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jaguars could easily take Reiff. Mularkey made some comments recently that sounded like they were going to address OL to ensure Gabbert has time to in the pocket. If they make that move in free agency then maybe I can see them passing on Reiff, but as it stands you have to consider the Jags a definite possibility to take Reiff ahead of us.

I'd consider it a great pick if he falls and we take him. I'd also consider it a great move if we trade down and let someone else take him and pick up an extra 2nd rounder or maybe get back a 3rd rounder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...