Trade up to #4?

[NJPanthers89]

Here's a scenario that could be of great interest. If Miami misses out on Peyton, they will go hard after Flynn and likely get him. this will leave Cleveland in dire straights as far as having a competent starting QB. They will be looking hard at Tannehill but they know #4 is too early for him. But our pick #9 is actually the perfect spot to grab Tannehill and gain a few picks just a few spots in front of Seattle and KC.

I personally would be willing to trade our 1st next year for the 6 slot swap in order to get Claiborne or Blackmon this year. It might only require our 2nd rounder this year ( based on the fact that a 1st rounder for next year is considered the same value as a current second rounder ).

Just wanted some opinions on this trade that IMHO has some serious potential especially with Hurney..

[Panthro]

No...please do not trade our 1st. We have too many needs....if they want to trade up from 22 and throw in a 2nd and 3rd rounder I would be more inclined to take that.

[chknwing]

No. No. No.

[Snake]

:rolleyes5:

[L-TownCat]

No...please do not trade our 1st. We have too many needs....if they want to trade up from 22 and throw in a 2nd and 3rd rounder I would be more inclined to take that.

Good idea, I'm down with this.

[Panthro]

then they could get Blackmon and Tannehill and we could scoop up Still/Brockers at #22, Zach Brown, and Hosley in the 2nd and Joe Adams in the 3rd.

[chef17]

If they really want him I don't see why they would trade down and hope he was still there instead of just picking him at 4.

[iamcline]

Zach Brown

:thumbsup:

[Panthro]

I can deal with him in the 2nd fo so

[NJPanthers89]

Why are we willing to trade back to receive second and third rounders we are notoriously known for missing big on? Why don't we trade up in the first and get the stud we want in Claiborne? We will have a potentially lockdown corner locked up for cheap for years to come. Look at the receivers in our division, they are better than the RB's at this point. We need a CB more than a DT.

[mwright350]

Every time we trade future picks away this forum explodes with people angry that we're mortgaging the future.

And every year before the draft we're awash with people who think we should trade away a future pick to move up a few spots.

I'm so confused.

[SOJA]

I can deal with him in the 2nd fo so

ehhhh I don't like him

[Panthro]

Why are we willing to trade back to receive second and third rounders we are notoriously known for missing big on? Why don't we trade up in the first and get the stud we want in Claiborne? We will have a potentially lockdown corner locked up for cheap for years to come. Look at the receivers in our division, they are better than the RB's at this point. We need a CB more than a DT.

We have more needs than just another CB though. What about Jenkins at #22 or Gillmore?

Claiborne is not a guarantee either. Patrick Peterson was pretty abysmal when it came to coverage last year....just saying

[Doyle]

We have the #9 pick. Lets make do with that.