Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Davis And Beason Miraculously Come Back Healthy


Recommended Posts

Our starting LB core should be Beason,Kuechly,and Davis. Right or wrong?

Even if Davis is 100% week 1. I don't think it would be wise to insert him as a starting LB. He wouldn't last. If he does make a full comeback he should be used in situational packages to limit his snaps and maximze his usage. Every down reps is just asking for him to blow his knee......again. Pulling for the guy but I would be surprised if he makes it out of camp.

I think it will be a combo of Luke, Beason, Anderson.....positions TBD. Depends on Beason's health.

Davis is the only PROVEN LB that has had success when asked to blitz. Beason historically has been bad when used as a blitzer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not worth starting a thread so I'm posting here...but just thought it was interesting...Chud, Anderson, Olsen, and Stewy are staying and playing at Pinehurst resort today and tomorrow. Had no idea Stewy was a golfer...

I know, I know.....Cool story bro!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TD should be broken in slowly, agree with the 'joker' suggestion... Let him work his way on to the field, not to question his effort or leadership, but preserve that knee. He came off the injury and started for us for 2 games, or played 1.15. Keep his name out of the starting lineup and he could see the post-season with the rest of the team....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not looking good for TB. Buffalo and Habs fans are the worst so I will be cheering for the meteor. 
    • Arguing about who had what and who did what with more is just going to end in the same charades. If we're going to waste a lot of hot air arguing then make it about something that cannot be denied. What you are seeing with your own two eyes. Cam Newton was a tremendously talented athlete albeit flawed in fundamental aspects. And although he played poorly in and lost a Super Bowl you cannot deny him that more often than not through his prime his teammates knew they could count on him to hold up his end of the bargain usually and be a key driving force for keeping them in games. Giving his defense much needed rest and motivation in wanting to match his grit as a competitor. That aspect is just not there with Bryce Young. Yeah he's dumped on the Falcons in a dome twice but what about his other 44 games? When has the Panthers defense the last three years ever looked at their starting quarterback and thought to themselves "man I'm so glad he's my QB"?
    • Rico walking is no big deal. I'll take a healthy 2024 Hubbard over Rico any time and losing Mays is, again, no a big deal.  Young is signed for what, $35M for the next two years? Say he wants $50M but the FO doesn't. If they put the franchise tag on him, that would be around $55? So basically they are getting Young for the next 3 years for an average of $30M per year. Putting the franchise tag on him wouldn't be my first choice but it gives them an option that wouldn't be locking him into a long term, $50M contract. I'm not suggestion they do that. Just that the option will be there should they get to that point. Hunt is on a 5 year deal which is done in 28 so he either restructures or is gone anyway. Moton will be 35 by then and will either be gone or have diminished playing time. Neither of those players has anything to do with getting Young a contract. The O line is way overpaid anyway. Hopefully by the time they are gone, Freeling and Hecht will be developed and Ickey will be healthy. Young was benched his second year and only got his job back because Dalton was injured. Not sure how you can call that entitled. And I would NOT say putting a rookie QB on a team with no receivers, tight ends or O lineman and then being put with a coach who never wanted you and is fired mid season, is a definition of luck. As far as competition, no team is going to bring in competition for a QB picked first overall - especially given the capital that was given up to get him.  
×
×
  • Create New...