Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Decent headphones/earbuds for the money.


thefuzz

Recommended Posts

I got a pair of Sony MDR-ED12 over a year ago for less than $10 and they've done pretty well. Nothing special but they fit my ears well and sound a lot better than those free ones with the ipod

i got the sony mdr-xd100. Really good headphones and feels comfortable over my ears.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm an audio engineer and I've used many different kinds of headphones.

My recommendation is, if your budget is on the cheap, to get something by Sony. I've had good experiences with their headphones from the cheap to the expensive kind. I'm not a fan of earbuds because they are more damaging to your hearing than regular closed-back headphones. But since you want them for running...earbuds might be the way to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have a pair of grado sr60i headphones. they are ugly as fug but they sound amazing. but you need to buy an amplifier so the total cost ends up being 20 dollars higher. They sound amazing. It will raise the hair on the back of your neck.

but they would be horrible for running. I've tried and I looked like a hipster douche with my retro electronics not to mention they constantly fell off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Urban Ears 60 bucks and they are the best head phones for the money that I have used.

Used Skull Candy's, Beats, and UrbanEars

My friend used to use Sony but I let him borrow my UrbanEars and he ended up and getting some himself.

$60 headphones are definitely better than $20 headphones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mentioned this in another thread but i'll restate it here. Keeping a wait and watch approach and passing on the 5th year option kinda makes sense like obliquely, but in practice neither the team or the player wants it. The player doesn't want to risk injury when he could have at least another year locked up, and the team doesn't want to risk the player blowing up in their fourth year and holding the team over the barrel. If you're the QB and you're playing that well you obviously test the free agent market, and you'd probably be bitter about it as well.  modern first round qb contracts are essentially 3 year deals with the option of an additional 2 to put downward pressure on contract extensions. You either pick up the 5th year, extend with a new contract, or move on.  just sitting tight on the fourth year isn't a practical choice for any of the parties. 
    • The point was Miles Sanders wasn't just a guy in Philly. He was at least as good as Chuba has been in Carolina. 
    • I have not been impressed with our pass blocking since at least 2022. Still remember watching Darnold live against the Seahawks when we were dominating them in the run game and we still allowed far too much pressure on him regardless. It has not gotten much better since. In fairness to this year's unit, they have been hit by injuries. Oftentimes, even a mediocre overall unit is better than a stacked one if the former stays healthy throughout the entire season. Constant shuffling only means a much greater likelihood someone will blow their assignment and that's all it takes for a sack or worse.
×
×
  • Create New...