Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is There Honestly A Better City To Win The Superbowl In Than New Orleans?


Guest Bwood

Recommended Posts

Guest Bwood

If we were to go all the way this season (knock on wood), how awesome would it be to win it all in the stadium of our most hated rival?

After all of the dilemmas going on in New Orleans this offseason, and the hatred that has been brewing between these teams even more since we got Cam, I can't think of anything better than hoisting the Lombardi on TV on their home turf.

Delusional offseason thread? Yes. But I'm all in this year and I know our boys are too. I don't wanna get my hopes up like a I have before but this could be the best opportunity we ever have, especially due to where the game will be played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Bwood

Yes, Charlotte.

Unfortunately I don't think the bowl will ever come to Charlotte.

But this year, there is a legitimate chance to do the dance on our most hated teams turf after all they went through the past season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately I don't think the bowl will ever come to Charlotte.

But this year, there is a legitimate chance to do the dance on our most hated teams turf after all they went through the past season.

I don't think Charlotte fits the hotel quota required to host a superbowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me Atlanta in the GA Dome:

1. Its 20 minutes from my house

2. The Falcons haven't won one yet so it's would hurt them even more.

3. It's indoor which I like. (Warm weather is best of course)

4. It would cause all the old Michael Vick fans who hate "Matty Ice" to go into full hate mode. Couple that with the people who hate Michael Vick and the fans that like him it would cause a "civil war" in Atlanta's fan base. It's brewing right now already.

5. It would convert many more bandwagon Falcon fans into Cam Newton fans, thus eliminating any home field advantage they have when half the stadium is cheering for Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope the team is playing in the SB in a few years when the 49ers new stadium is done so I can watch them win the Super Bowl and only be out of pocket the ticket money. You guys can all bunk at my house, except TCF who I'm pretty sure is a serial murderer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...