Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Curb your negativity bro cha chos!


toldozer

Recommended Posts

The first team defense forced 2 turnovers and held a playoff team to field goals TWICE. This will be a bend but don't break d that will take chances to create turnovers till opponents get in the red zone. This team has definite playoff potential. So cool your mother fuging jets!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think this will be a bend don't break defense at all. People are making way too much of what they saw last night. This defense is going to be an aggressive pressure defense. We will try to force the offense to make turnovers and dictate the pace of the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first team defense forced 2 turnovers and held a playoff team to field goals TWICE. This will be a bend but don't break d that will take chances to create turnovers till opponents get in the red zone. This team has definite playoff potential. So cool your mother fuging jets!

I was thinking about making the obligatory sky-is-not-falling-thread, but figured that it's a pointless lesson in futility. It's that time of year where extremes---one way or another---will make the usual Huddle stupidity appear benign. It is what it is. Sit back, enjoy the entertainment, or even throw yourself into the storm and ride the winds of anarchy to and fro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think this will be a bend don't break defense at all. People are making way too much of what they saw last night. This defense is going to be an aggressive pressure defense. We will try to force the offense to make turnovers and dictate the pace of the game.

I was going to say the same thing. Would pie you, but it ain't working.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking about making the obligatory sky-is-not-falling-thread, but figured that it's a pointless lesson in futility. It's that time of year where extremes---one way or another---will make the usual Huddle stupidity appear benign. It is what it is. Sit back, enjoy the entertainment, or even throw yourself into the storm and ride the winds of anarchy to and fro.

Ain't it the truth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first team defense forced 2 turnovers and held a playoff team to field goals TWICE. This will be a bend but don't break d that will take chances to create turnovers till opponents get in the red zone. This team has definite playoff potential. So cool your mother fuging jets!

People are only commenting on what they saw in our 1st Preseason. Granted there are a lot of negative comments, mostly because there were a lot of negative things to comment about. But, yes our 1st team defense did well in a lot of areas and I hope that it will be greatly improved. But then again, Beason would improve any defense.

I'm ready for an exciting season!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think this will be a bend don't break defense at all. People are making way too much of what they saw last night. This defense is going to be an aggressive pressure defense. We will try to force the offense to make turnovers and dictate the pace of the game.

What I ment by bend but don't break probably isn't the correct term. Basically like what you are saying.aggressive trying to force turnovers until the red zone. Which will result in big plays for one team or the other. Then buckle down in the red zone and try and force field goals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I ment by bend but don't break probably isn't the correct term. Basically like what you are saying.aggressive trying to force turnovers until the red zone. Which will result in big plays for one team or the other. Then buckle down in the red zone and try and force field goals.

I agree with you that our defense will make big plays but the weakness is that it will give up some as well.

But I don't think we will play philosophically different between the 20s versus the redzone. If anything we will just dial up more pressure. I watched Jim Johnson defenses for year and you could always count on the fact we would blitz on third down and more than 5 and inside the redzone we would blitz on just about every down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I blame it on the "ME" generation. They have the patience of a two year old. They put their time and energy into being a Panther fan. So they expect results immediately. And when that does not happen. They fap away, showing their displeasure, and letting the world know that once again they are not a happy camper.

Zod, I feel for the future with these kids in charge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...