Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dolphins scouting report


Snake

Recommended Posts

I have NFL preseason rewind so I was scouting the Dolphins first team today on Offense and Defense.

So a little info on the Dolphins before we start.

OC

Mike Sherman

DC

Kevin Coyle

Offense

West Coast

Defense

4-3

Things on Offense.

Matt Moore started a QB for this game with a already Banged up David Garrard.

This WCO is high tempo and used No huddle most of the time the starting line was in.

The offense uses mostly a single back set with 3 and 4 WRs.

Moore's favorte target was TE Fasano who was there best Receiver also.

Dolphins WRs are a mess with no true WR1 with C. Johnson being released.

There offensive line is avg with a Rookie starting at RT. He looks and plays like a rookie as well and was beat by the Buc's on more than one occasion.

They seemed to use more of there playbook in this first game than one would have expected and Moore was calling out audibles on most plays.

On to defense

They are now a 4-3 defense.

There defensive line is very good and has two good DTs.

There Dline generated a good push and had pressure.

They blitzed on many occasions and like the offense seemed to use a bit more of there play book then most teams(def more than we did).

There DBs are there weak spot though. There best DB is Richard Marshall. Yes the one we all know and no he has not got much better. Good run defender and avg pass defender.

The rests of there DBs besides Marshall are BAD, and thats all I can say about them.

WIth closing I would have like to see a little more of there starting offense but the buc's where shutting them down quite well and nether pass nor run was working.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There is a Grand Canyon-sized chasm between your opinion and the opinions of most former player hockey guys who do this for a living.
    • I can only imagine the **** eating grins on the committee right now. "Oh, Bama didn't deserve it? Oh, Miami didn't deserve it? Suck it, haters!" lol
    • To say that, is gaslighting, because it isn’t true. I mean, maybe one or two people do that but it isn’t the predominant behavior. Even Frank has given him credit. I think particularly the Rams game. A couple of glowing posts.   I know I have. Gotta be honest about it because if you aren’t it undermines what else you say.  But the degree of how far I go with credit, in terms of it being a projection of future performance? Not very far. Acknowledge it, but require more of it. There is a lot of bad play to offset.    I tried to remain passive while the last 9 games (post ankle injury) played out. It is just really hard when the lows won’t go away. I failed. As high as a couple of those highs were, there isn’t enough.    I know it is premature to just say I want to move on, made my decision after 6 of those games ended up pretty much really good or not good enough, but I have had enough of being patient and letting him show the reality either way.  So in my view, he Could still validate himself to a decent degree if he smokes the last three starts. But also in my view I don’t expect to see it. Maybe one more high quality start, would be my expectation. So yes he could still somehow justify having the job next year. If that happened I still wouldn’t have much faith given the last three years and all that has transpired. Again, there is a lot of bad play to offset. 
×
×
  • Create New...