Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gimmick Run Plays


chknwing

Recommended Posts

Why does Carolina use so many gimmick run plays? Just about every other team lines up in standard formations with the same and or better results. Is there a deficiency in the Oline they are trying to conceal? Is there such thing as having too many run options on a play. I would tend to think that if the oline knows where the ball carrier is going, they can open a better hole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why go with something that's proven, when you can be "innovative?"

It's better to be considered a genius and win 7 of 20 games than win doing the cliché traditional offense. If only style points counted. The added bonus is that it might delay the development of your young QB!

It's kind of like trendy hipsters listening to crappy music. It's so bad that it's awesome!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're trying to use Cam's running ability to give the opposing D something else to worry about... but I agree, you can't run the option read every damn time. Sometimes you out trick yourself...

The ATL game was much better imo in terms of offensive play calling (until the last two series anyway)...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I heard them say Sunday that Rivera wanted the team identity to be run the ball and play defense. I thought to myself, he needs to relate that Chud before everyone starts thinking we are a passing team. I been saying all this year that they need to go with some power running formations and quit messing with that Tolbert as a wide-out mularkey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not even a particularly nuanced opinion, yet it seems out of reach for so many.
    • I don’t think he can be great. For me he tops out as starter maybe make the playoffs, stuff like that. I would have been okay with that kind of player as a placeholder but you don’t invest the time and assets we did and be happy with that.  On the cure,If a guy has mechanical flaws but otherwise is enticing, you let someone else make the mistake of taking him in the top of the 1st. If he doesn’t get taken you can pick him up 2nd or 3rd day and try to develop him (off the bench not starting).  The risk/reward with Bryce was horribly misjudged. I didn’t want to trade like that in the first place because I didn’t see the generation talent that justifies that type of move, but once it was done CJ was the better gamble. No doubt. 
    • That's what I mean. If you claim to possess some super knowledge about the QB position from a previous non-football but football related job, wouldn't you want to expound upon that to support this "everyone doesn't know anything about being a QB" thesis? The rest is just summed up by stating that there are a lot of variables to a QB being successful. Yeah....I mean that isn't earth shattering.  While there is certainly a lot of luck involved in all manners of success, consistent success with the variables around you also changing on a regular basis is usually fairly conclusive.  Is Trent Dilfer the same as Tom Brady? Is Nick Foles the same as Patrick Mahomes? I supposed based on the OP's arguments, they are. That's not really the way it turned out, however.  The NFL isn't unlike most other jobs or even other sports. The cream typically does rise to the top on a more consistent basis. Is it accidental that premier poker players seem to win or perform very well on a consistent basis, give that any individual hand is largely luck?  
×
×
  • Create New...