Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A list of FA's Panthers may target by Jonathan Jones of the observer


jtnc

Recommended Posts

Carolina Panthers general manager Dave Gettleman said last month the biggest offseason goal was getting under the salary cap by March 12.

He beat the deadline by four days. Carolina cut Chris Gamble on Friday to get under the $123 million cap, and now the Panthers have two days to negotiate with unrestricted free agents before free agency begins in earnest around the league Tuesday.

Almost $4 million under the cap, the Panthers still need to find another $6 million to $8 million in cap space to get far enough below the cap to re-sign their own players, pick up free agents and sign draft picks.

Carolina needs help from its veterans to shave that money. Pro Bowl center Ryan Kalil and tight end Greg Olsen have helped the team with restructured deals in the past month, and veteran left tackle Jordan Gross has been asked to do the same.

Gettleman has said he doesn’t want player cuts and restructured contracts to be quick fixes for the upcoming season. He plans to think two or three years down the road.

“You can’t just think about 2013,” he said last month in Indianapolis. “You’ve got to get beyond that. We’ve got to be thoughtful about this. With it being as flat as its been the last couple of years and people are talking it’s going to be that way for a couple more years, you’ve got to try to climb out of the hole. The only way you’re gonna do that is if you’re thoughtful.”

Carolina has 14 free agents on the roster, but special teams captain and backup linebacker Jordan Senn has already agreed to a one-year deal with the Panthers.

Cornerback Captain Munnerlyn and defensive tackle Dwan Edwards are two of the top targets for the Panthers to re-sign. Munnerlyn grew more comfortable in his nickel role, and Edwards had six sacks in his first year with the Panthers.

Not as sure to re-sign with the team are backup quarterback Derek Anderson and receiver Louis Murphy. With former offensive coordinator Rob Chudzinski’s departure to the Browns, Anderson expressed a desire to return to the Browns. Murphy’s speed and likability in the locker room work in his favor, but there may be better options.

Here’s a look at some free agents the Panthers may go after in the coming weeks:

D.J. Moore, CB, Chicago

With the release of Gamble, the Panthers are thin at corner. Moore, a fourth-year player from Spartanburg, has 10 interceptions and two touchdowns in his career. He was told earlier this week he was not in Chicago’s future plans.

David Garrard, QB, Miami

The free-agent pool for quarterbacks is filled with backups, and Garrard, though he hasn’t played since the 2010 season, has a history with Panthers offensive coordinator Mike Shula. If Anderson decides to go to Cleveland, Garrard, a former East Carolina standout, can be a cheap pick-up for Carolina.

Adrian Wilson, S, Arizona

The five-time Pro Bowler is a 12-year veteran and doesn’t have many seasons left in him. But the Panthers had a patchwork secondary for the second half of the season, and Wilson, a High Point native and former N.C. State player, will be coveted by several teams.

Ramses Barden and Domenik Hixon, WRs, N.Y. Giants

The two receivers are very familiar with Gettleman, who was the Giants director of pro personnel for 13 years. Barden torched the Panthers in Week 3 for 138 receiving yards, and either one of the players could push No. 2 WR Brandon LaFell harder than Murphy did this past season.

Chris Canty, DT, N.Y. Giants

The hometown discount may be overplayed, but Canty told a Charlotte radio station he’d consider it if the Panthers come calling. Another player familiar with Gettleman, Canty could help middle linebacker Luke Kuechly roam.

Read more here: http://www.charlotte...l#storylink=cpy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Garrard isn't a bad QB options but he's older and tends to get injured more (which isn't a good thing for a back up

I said it in another thread but oh fuggin well... Brent Grimes isn't getting a lot of attention in FA so I wouldn't mind him here (he should come cheap if he stays quiet in FA)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Garrard isn't a bad QB options but he's older and tends to get injured more (which isn't a good thing for a back up

I said it in another thread but oh fuggin well... Brent Grimes isn't getting a lot of attention in FA so I wouldn't mind him here (he should come cheap if he stays quiet in FA)

I think the reason is he is coming off a torn achilles same as beason did.that would be a risky move

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Signing of a WR in FA is totally being over played! We don't need Band-Aids at WR, we need another legit no.1 WR on the team

I'd say we need both. After Smitty and LaFell, the drop off is pretty significant. AE is gone. Murphy should be. Pilares is a good 5th option. Who knows how Adams will develop at the position and Gettis is a huge question mark.

We need a future #1 AND some Improved depth beyond the #2 position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ramses Barden and Domenik Hixon, WRs, N.Y. Giants

The two receivers are very familiar with Gettleman, who was the Giants director of pro personnel for 13 years. Barden torched the Panthers in Week 3 for 138 receiving yards, and either one of the players could push No. 2 WR Brandon LaFell harder than Murphy did this past season.

Beating up a weakling doesn't mean you're powerful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Signing of a WR in FA is totally being over played! We don't need Band-Aids at WR, we need another legit no.1 WR on the team

There werent even 32 legit #1 WRs in the NFL last year. Not that easy to just pick one up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...