Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

My source has told me...


Verge

Recommended Posts

Same could be said for Austin.

I hope we don't take Austin. Taking a career slot guy would be pretty stupid.

If he's as good or better than Welker, i'd take that all day long. Could he bust or be an underachiever? Sure! I don't think he will. I think he's the biggest play maker in the draft. Also think he'd be a safer pick than Vacarro. If he can be a weapon that the D/ST always have to account for, then its well worth it. Tavon may also be BPA.

BTW,Tavon has played all over the field not just as a slot guy...or RB. And he'd do the same here. Just move him around to create mismatches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bill Polian was just on the Mothership channel and he views Austin as a potentially dominating player out of the slot.

So that would make Mayock, Polian, KIper, McShay and a crap load of others who not only love Austin but Vaccaro as well.

I think it was Mayock last night saying you have to watch Vacarro's 2011 film to see his coverage and back-end defense which he said was stellar.

I see the same missed tackles and poor angles everyone else sees with him as well as the flash plays from youtube highlights. Mayock said that the coaches wanted him to play in the box in 2012 bc the run defense was suspect and they liked Vaccaro's blitzing.

Honestly I have only watched one actual game in 2012 and 2 in 2011 but never saw Vaccaro stand out.

I will go by the guys who watch film and evaluate the specific skill set and Vaccaro has the prototype Physical size you want in a safety.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...