Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Per Brett Jensen (WFNZ) Vegas only has Panthers favored in 4 games


SCP

Recommended Posts

Tough schedule + Subpar coaching = Vegas has no faith.

We are a 3.5 pt. home dog against the Seahawks and only a 1 pt. favorite against the Bills. 6.5 pt dog against the 9ers and 3.5 home dog against the Pats.

Place your bets. I'd take the action on those first two games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vegas isn't just about getting people to put money on games....

We haven't had a winning record in almost a half decade. Only way to get people to bet on us is to give us points

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seahawks first game of the season across country, yes please, if that game was in Seattle I would say its a push but with that being a home game for us I would go with us.

I think we are a lot better then the bills, because you know.... We have a offense

Idk about the pats or 9ers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

where do they have the cowboys?

 

Every year Vegas grossly overvalues the cowboys and has them as favorites in way more games than they should. They do this of course because there is a massive amount of idiot bandwagon cowboys fans that will bet on them anyway. I'm sure Vegas makes a killing by making these intentionally unbalanced lines. I haven't even looked but I don't expect this year to be any different.

 

Someone mentioned blindly betting on the Panthers every week, you can actually blindly bet against the cowboys every week and make money overall. This has held true for years now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, you're right. It doesn't mean you can't call out his flaws and poor play. But it also doesn't mean you can't admit when he plays well and shows improvement. Not you personally, just in general I mean.
    • I will say, I do think there's a version of Bryce that could be really successful as a high-volume passer in a spread-based offense built around quick throws and timing-based intermediate throws with deeper throws schemed up around them. I actually think the power run based offense we're running is a poor fit for Bryce as it requires him to play under center far more often. It's a very traditional offensive approach whereas I think a scheme that spreads defenses out and lets Bryce distribute the ball quickly with anticipation and accuracy is the sweet spot for him. The key, of course, is to find a way to run the ball efficiently out of those formations. Our personnel right now (backs and OL) aren't good fits for that style of offense and I'm not sure it's a scheme Dave Canales favors very much either.
    • I root for him, and I hope for the best, as does essentially everyone. But that doesn’t mean you can’t call out flaws and bad plays. And that’s what a lot of people get wrong.  I hope I’m wrong and that he continues to improve a lot, I just doubt it. But I’ve been wrong before 
×
×
  • Create New...