Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Deangelo Williams Restructures Contract


SCP

Recommended Posts

Good. No way he could of played with his old number this year.

Very good news...get to keep him and create the same amount of rooms June 1 cut would have made. This was the best case scenario

 

see? all that arguing over nothing. as i said before, DG knows what hes doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i don't think he took a pay cut this year. They converted his salary this year and next year into a signing bonus and added 2 years onto the contract for proration purposes. It was hard to tell if they cut it in 2015 given all the numbers thrown around. But I bet he retires in 2015 if not sooner.

I expect him to retire at the end of 2015.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DWill is a stand up guy.  Something most of us already knew.  We have a team full of unselfish players that truly just want to win.  This could be a sign of something special.  Now lets not waste his measure of good faith and go out there and win something! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, poor scheme and blocking are on DLo, the guy who had a 5.0 ypc coming into last season.

 

 

Saves 3.2 million this and next season..Gettle Magic!!

Also another win is we do not have to rid ourselves of a veteran playmaker..just hope Deangelo comes ready to play by week 1 instead of week 6.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great news we get to keep d will a world class rb and save a good bit of cap, if beason restructures this will be a epic off-season.

 

This has been an awesome offseason.  Beason will not restructure and Gettleman should not ask him to do it.  If he falls flat this year, you can cut him or trade him and save more money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...