Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CSR raises questions about Beason at strong side

AntiBuc

By AntiBuc,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

AntiBuc Newbie

AntiBuc

Posted
Posted

I'm not much of an expert on discerning reliable vs. unreliable reporting but I came across this article today from Cat Scratch Reader about camp battles and it raises some questions about Beason's presumed move to strongside LB.

 

"Now that Beason is still being limited by his injury and rumors he may not want to move over there anyway I think the job is wide open."

 

This raises doubts about Beason's readiness and his willingness to play strongside?  Hadn't heard that before...anyone heard anything to corroborate that?

 

Here's a link to the article - http://www.derp/2013/5/22/4355128/an-early-look-at-panthers-top-5-position-battles

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JawnyBlaze Grand Master

JawnyBlaze

Posted
Posted

More an inferior site rubbish. I read another article there this morning that seemed to be a poor attempt at humor that was just a big rip on Cam. A bunch of commenters took it serious and one of the an inferior site cronies commented that it was satire. It was obviously not intended to be taken literally but it was a terrible attempt at satire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Montsta Rising Star

Montsta

Posted
Posted

When the huddle crashed a little while ago (may have been during the draft, I don't remember) I went to an inferior site for the first time and saw someone talking about how they get an influx of people from here whenever this site crashes because of the shitty servers used here. I was thinking, if we were in a bar right now I'd punch this guy in the throat. Carolinahuddle.com is my site you basic bitch. I then felt like kind of a nerd for even thinking twice about defending a website I frequent against non-huddlers. I live a sad life.

/endrage

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KSpan Grand Master

KSpan

Posted
Posted

Beason wasn't all that good at WLB in 2010 either. I'm not overly enthused about moving TD from the spot where he's flourished to make room for a guy who wasn't nearly as good when he played there, but camp will tell the story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
weymouthst Newbie

weymouthst

Posted
Posted

Obviously you have to put Keek and Beason where they play the best, being the two best LB's. Davis can do w/e the team needs him to do, not like he is an investment or anything. IMO, Davis isn't going to see much time on field, there will be a LB that steps up and take a lot of reps away from him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Floppin Grand Master

Floppin

Posted
Posted

Obviously you have to put Keek and Beason where they play the best, being the two best LB's. Davis can do w/e the team needs him to do, not like he is an investment or anything. IMO, Davis isn't going to see much time on field, there will be a LB that steps up and take a lot of reps away from him.

If Davis's knees hold up, there's no linebacker on our roster that will take snaps from him. He's an absolute monster.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jay Roosevelt
      fug the HATERS

      By Jay Roosevelt · Posted

      No, you're right. It doesn't mean you can't call out his flaws and poor play. But it also doesn't mean you can't admit when he plays well and shows improvement. Not you personally, just in general I mean.
    • Jay Roosevelt
      fug the HATERS

      By Jay Roosevelt · Posted

      I will say, I do think there's a version of Bryce that could be really successful as a high-volume passer in a spread-based offense built around quick throws and timing-based intermediate throws with deeper throws schemed up around them. I actually think the power run based offense we're running is a poor fit for Bryce as it requires him to play under center far more often. It's a very traditional offensive approach whereas I think a scheme that spreads defenses out and lets Bryce distribute the ball quickly with anticipation and accuracy is the sweet spot for him. The key, of course, is to find a way to run the ball efficiently out of those formations. Our personnel right now (backs and OL) aren't good fits for that style of offense and I'm not sure it's a scheme Dave Canales favors very much either.
    • Martin
      fug the HATERS

      By Martin · Posted

      I root for him, and I hope for the best, as does essentially everyone. But that doesn’t mean you can’t call out flaws and bad plays. And that’s what a lot of people get wrong.  I hope I’m wrong and that he continues to improve a lot, I just doubt it. But I’ve been wrong before 
×
×
  • Create New...