Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

the kraken is frustrated...

nosuchthingasapanther

Recommended Posts

nosuchthingasapanther Explorer

nosuchthingasapanther

Posted
Posted

didn't see this posted...

 

GQ ‏@ItsGHardy 4 Jul

Tell me this why is it that when highlights come on about us starting fast this yr we only show Cam @Blafell1 and @gregolsen82 ...cont

 

GQ ‏@ItsGHardy 4 Jul

You people know these mother frz ( love all three guys like brothers) but dang can u at least show the d line and star for god sake ..cont

 

GQ ‏@ItsGHardy 4 Jul

You don't have to put the kraken on tv but at least make it more than passing and catching. This is my official statement espn is...cont

 

GQ ‏@ItsGHardy 4 Jul

Turning football into. Circus if it hasn't already done so (call me optimistic about the game I love) it's about balance and equal ...cont

 

GQ ‏@ItsGHardy 4 Jul

Distribution of responsibility u can't score without the ball guys u need 22

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CelibatePimp Newbie

CelibatePimp

Posted
Posted

What he is saying is true but there is a reason the QB position is arguably the most important on the team. Plus most good QB are the faces of their franchises so as long as Cam remains the face of the franchise, the media seeking to show any news on the panthers will show Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRumGone Grand Master

TheRumGone

Posted
Posted

i usually don't like when players talk out except in certain scenarios.

 

but i hope this is firing up that defense. I hope he is saying this to other players in person not just twitter. make the media have to show you guys (J.J. Watt, Clay Matthews, ect.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CelibatePimp Newbie

CelibatePimp

Posted
Posted

I know he is good but he needs to play really well if he wants that kind of media love. Take Luke for eg, he's getting props for the DROY performance he gave up and now when our defense gets talked about, he's the one that's mentioned. If Kraken and co continue to tear up QBs, ala the hit on Palmer, I'm sure they'll be getting more highlights.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRed Newbie

TheRed

Posted
Posted

He makes good points. Consistency is something we need more of from both sides of the ball though. If our DL doesn't give QB's like Brady Quinn all day to throw and allow him to look like an all pro, that'd be a start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Some homers' opinions of the OTs that we may realistically be able to get at 19

      By MHS831 · Posted

      You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • strato
      Off-season topic: WWYD? Total Branding Redesign

      By strato · Posted

      Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • csx
      Baldinger on the 2026 LB Class

      By csx · Posted

      We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...