Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

OK, so I saw a little speculation about Raiders' D. Moore

top dawg

By top dawg,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted

This site, The Raider Nation Times, seems to be kinda throwing poo up against the wall with speculation that the unhappiness with Denarius Moore's consistency may lead him to being traded.

 

 

As the 2013 NFL regular season approaches, fans of the Oakland Raiders are rife with anticipation. The "new era" is fully under way, and the team is jettisoning it's dead weight, replacing it with high-character, high-motor guys. 

Is Denarius Moore one of those? After a news conference with offensive coordinator Greg Olson and head coach Dennis Allen, many are left to wonder about that, and the rumor mill is buzzing.

According to the Examiner.com, Allen stated that Moore's concentration has dropped off, especially in practice. Moore's performances in practice have been described as "frustrating" and "inconsistent."

 

 

Of course Moore's concentration may not be there, he has effectively been misused because he is a deep ball receiver, and Flynn can throw about as long as I can (not to mention being behind perhaps the worst O-line in football this season).  Moore would be a prime candidate for a new change of scenery in my estimation. He has the skills to take it to the next level.

 

Hypothetically speaking, if you were G-man would you throw out some feelers to see what it would take to acquire Moore? If there was some interest, and some way to work it out, would you make that move?  You know we'd have to give something up (probably draft value).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Stumpy
      Flux

      By Stumpy · Posted

      Not sure who said it first, but Tepper is the correct answer. Still, I'm gonna go with Kasay keeping it inbounds. If, you subscribe to the butterfly effect version of time travel consequences.... When we win SBXXXVIII everybody's lives change: Moose never breaks his leg, We win it all again in 05. Tommy Jone is unknown and Peppers stays home, Champs once more 2008. No artificial pig heart turning JR into a creepy weirdo, no lockout, no Clausen. Fox and Jake ride off into the sunset on their own terms. No 2-14, no #1 pick. But, no laptop, no Blinn, 3 years behind The Golden Calf of Bristol, we still get Cam. JR let's him grow his locs like he always wanted, Smitty sees Cam in a new light. Dreads swinging, (and Smitty with his 3 Lombardis behind him) Cam is old enough to get those calls. No Manning narrative, Cotchery TD, PI against Talib on Philly Brown, 10,000 RTP calls and Kony Ealy SB50 MVP. No Jeans Fridays, no Tepper. KB doesn't slip on his own meatsweat mid-route in SD, Cam becomes the 1st QB to win 10 straight SBs. Retiring after being elected 47th president of the US of A, Cam ushers in the Permanent Proletarian Revolution across the globe, Xi Jinping bows in awe. "ẄøŘƙƐṛ§ őF ŧĤə ŵØRłð, ŮŊÏŦƐ!!!"
    • Aussie Tank
      Vrabel and Russini? Athletic investigating.

      By Aussie Tank · Posted

      Yeah your right the owner was copping hand shandies while all this was going down 
    • Jackie Lee
      Vrabel and Russini? Athletic investigating.

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      I mean not surprised the Patriots took him in and aren't trying to push him out. They've been the most morally bankrupt team in the NFL for a long while. Wouldn't be surprised if Vrabel has his own dirt on Kraft/Brady and other assholes from that organization over the last couple decades. 
×
×
  • Create New...