Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How much have we improved from 2012?


MHS831

Recommended Posts

OFFENSE

 

Quarterback:  Same.  While I think Cam will have a better year, I think he is not to blame for 7-9--he is the reason we got to 7-9 with that team.  Maybe the chemistry is better, but his preseason was not impressive.

 

RB:  Better.  We learned how to use Tolbert, added Barner, and have DWill and Stewart (eventually).  Last year the QB out rushed the backs. That is not happening this season.

 

TE: Same.  Williams is raw and Olsen and Hartsock are constant. 

 

OT: Somewhat Worse:  I see Bell as a very hard-working, limited T.  Gross will slide each year until we decide he is done.  No improvement here, unless Chandler catches fire.

 

OG: Better:  Wharton, Silatolu, and Williams are better than a rookie and Hangartner.

 

C: Better:  Kalil was injured for much of the season, which is why we fell short of his Super Bowl prediction.

 

WR:  Somewhat Better.  While we still need that superstar who is not 5'9" and 34, we are better. Smitty still has some juice in the tank, Lafell is improving, and Edwards/Ginn/Hixon are better than Murphy.

 

DEFENSE

 

S: Better.  Godfrey at FS is better than Godfrey at SS.  Mitchell and Mikell are better than Godfrey at SS.  Everyone is better than Nakamura. 

 

CB: Somewhat Better,  Gamble was hurt for most of the season.  We started a fifth-round rookie from Coastal Carolina, some of the time, Dockery and Thomas the rest.  Experience alone makes us better, but Moore and White do too.

 

OLB:  Somewhat Better.  Davis has shaken the rust off,while Beason begins the process, but Davis and Beason are tremendous football players.  Beason may take some time to surpass Anderson's production because he is learning and getting back into football shape, but do not discount the fact that beason makes others better.  The improvement lies in the addition of Chase Blackburn and AJ Klein. 

 

MLB: Somewhat Better.  How can anyone expect Luke to improve on his NFL-leading tackle total?  He will become a better player because there are now 4 guys in front of him who will garner some attention. 

 

DE: Better,  Hardy came into his own last season, but this is his breakout season.  Stay tuned.  Johnson is still solid and Alexander is no longer a rookie.  Star, KK, and Dwan will demand double teams.  Happy days are here again.  Expect 30 sacks from our DEs.

 

DT:  Unbelievably better:  Star > Fua.  KK and Dwan > Dwan and Chandler.  The biggest improvement

 

SPECIAL TEAMS

 

K: Somewhat Better. Gano has been stroking it with confidence and power--like Rum is gone with a Victoria Secret catalog.  Impressive.

 

P: Better.  During the second half of the season, Nortman improved his average by 5 yards.  He seemed to be getting some good hang time and distance this preseason. 

 

PR: Better.  Ted Ginn.

 

KR: Same:  Not sure who gets the work, but I doubt we see worse than 2012.

 

 

While the Panthers have weak spots, so do all other teams.  Hats off to Gettlemen for giving us a chance to compete.  Screw you Hurney, and may the guy who stomped your face with golf spikes live a long and prosperous life for having the vision to do what we all would have done had it not been already done. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we're a much better team honestly

 

I agree.  I will however temper the level of excitement I had prior to last year until I see it game one.  Last year's opening half of live action took more wind out of my sails than Jake Delhomme's season giveaway on a Saturday night some years back (almost).  I'm going to wait and see.  

That said.  We are better on paper and there are logical reasons to believe there is added motivation to go with the situational improvements.

 

Reason #1: Riv is on the hot seat and is respected by his players.  That is a powerful combo

 

Reason #2: A porous middle of the D not only gives a green light to up the middle rushing, it pretty much renders all leads we had unsafe and any lead we have to overcome insurmountable based on the O's ability to salt away time with the run.  Star changes this, not to mention Short.  We no longer have one of the biggest psychological de-motivators in the sport working against us like we have had for the last halff decade or more.

 

Reason #3: Legitimate attitude and confidence in the punt return game.  Ginn is a weapon.  It gives us an identity.  It makes OC's rethink every 3rd down play call (if not all of them) knowing hat they face.  True home run potential.  Have not had that since a brief stint with Smitty and Bates before that.  Players, coaches and fans alike will get excited every time the punt team takes the field.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only concern in my mind is that offensive line. In all honesty, that is the only thing that makes me cringe. The defense is probably the best part of this team. Special teams is average if not slightly above average with just the addition of Ginn. The offense with Hixon and Ginn become slightly better. Defenses will have to respect Ginns speed, Hixons reliability, when on the field that is. LaFell and Smith are a lock. Not even mentioning Olsen that catches anything thrown to him on and he can block now. The line... The offensive line is the achillies heel in this team.

 

The way I see it. Those 7 or 8 games we have lost by a margin of 7 points or less the past two seasons. WIll be won by exactly that much or more now that several pieces are back and the special teams can score and provide better field position. The defense seems primed to score at any given moment as well. So again, this season will be wonderful in my eyes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think all of that is mostly right, but I still think our o-line is a disaster waiting to happen.

 

But just think about next year. If o-line is really our only huge weakness, and we can spend a few early round picks on it and WRs, we literally will be literally pretty good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...