Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ranking the Young QB's According to ESPN


Wyank

Recommended Posts

What a shameless gutless article. How the fug can they have the slightest idea into Cam's intelligence? Because of post game interviews? I'm tired of this borderline racist poo man. Cam's asked to do more than of these guys and physically superior and more durable than all of them. Sheer idiocy.

I'd exclude Luck from that...he was asked to make a lot of throws consistantly.

RG and Kap weren't asked to consistantly make tough throws each week

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lmao wtf is this?

Intelligence? This is clearly an opinion cuz there are zero measurables to compare the 5 of them considering Kaep played in about 9 games in his life, so every mistake gets choked up to "he'll learn." So in the eyes of the rankers: potential > reality

Accuracy: Cam lacks this in the past but look extremely well in the Seattle game. If anything RGIII was wasaaay off

Durability: lmao is this a joke? Our QB who has gotten rocked countless times, played in all 33 games, and is built like a linebacker is 4th?

Supporting cast: agree for the most part, but are we worse off then the colts?

Urgency: again, im glad they are so sure and confident ranking something that cant be quantified

This list reminds me so much of madden ratings. If u look, they give Jordan Gross a 12 for man coverage and then Ryan Kalil a 15. Wtf?!? Im not saying they should be higher, im just asking how the hell theres a difference between the 2, when uve seen NONE of them do that EVER

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the unnamed random AFC QB coach.....claiming Cam is a me first player at heart. pretty sure no AFC QB coach has ever worked with Newton....

 

Wonder if they meant Chud, but were trying to label him as QB guru?

 

Don't know, just wondering.

 

That said, this is all tied to winning.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lmao wtf is this?

Intelligence? This is clearly an opinion cuz there are zero measurables to compare the 5 of them considering Kaep played in about 9 games in his life, so every mistake gets choked up to "he'll learn." So in the eyes of the rankers: potential > reality

Accuracy: Cam lacks this in the past but look extremely well in the Seattle game. If anything RGIII was wasaaay off

Durability: lmao is this a joke? Our QB who has gotten rocked countless times, played in all 33 games, and is built like a linebacker is 4th?

Supporting cast: agree for the most part, but are we worse off then the colts?

Urgency: again, im glad they are so sure and confident ranking something that cant be quantified

This list reminds me so much of madden ratings. If u look, they give Jordan Gross a 12 for man coverage and then Ryan Kalil a 15. Wtf?!? Im not saying they should be higher, im just asking how the hell theres a difference between the 2, when uve seen NONE of them do that EVER

 

That's an awful example.  The computer auto generates ratings that the position wouldn't be good at when coding, and then they go and fine tune any ratings that they need too. Nobody actually goes in and assigns man and zone coverage ratings for every single Offensive Lineman.  Also, why the fug does it matter? They both suck at it and you would never have them covering a player....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. Until we start winning some games we will get NO respect. And we shouldn't.

Gman said it - it's time to start winning Cam....

Completely agree for the most part. But "Panthers arent winning so that means Cam's not... durable....?"

Such a dumb list. But then again, its getting 10,000's of clicks from pissed off fans. So i guess their plan worked

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point I agree with that list

 

I dont care if Newton has all the ability in the world, until he finds us a way to win I would rank these other guys higher. If rankings were based on ability then J Russell would (and was) the best QB the NFL may have ever seen, but its not about ability - its about the ability to find a way to win and these other guys have.

 

It doesn't matter if it a 'team' game, that ship has sailed..

 

Once the Panthers start winning, these rankings will change.  It's all about winning games, and Cam will unfairly be judged until the Panthers losing ways change.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's an awful example. The computer auto generates ratings that the position wouldn't be good at when coding, and then they go and fine tune any ratings that they need too. Also, why the fug does it matter? They both suck at it and you would never have them covering a player....

Yeah ur making my point for me. The computer should "randomly generate" a 0 for that rating. Or give them both a 10. Im saying, DIFFERENTIATING between the 2 is redic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah ur making my point for me. The computer should "randomly generate" a 0 for that rating. Or give them both a 10. Im saying, DIFFERENTIATING between the 2 is redic

 

You don't understand how coding works do you? They set a range and it assigns an arbitrary number for useless ratings by position.  As in no human ever touches the thing.  As in they give it no thought whatsoever they just let the computer assign a number.  Really not that difficult....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...