Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ranking the Young QB's According to ESPN


Wyank

Recommended Posts

What a shameless gutless article. How the fug can they have the slightest idea into Cam's intelligence? Because of post game interviews? I'm tired of this borderline racist poo man. Cam's asked to do more than of these guys and physically superior and more durable than all of them. Sheer idiocy.

I'd exclude Luck from that...he was asked to make a lot of throws consistantly.

RG and Kap weren't asked to consistantly make tough throws each week

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lmao wtf is this?

Intelligence? This is clearly an opinion cuz there are zero measurables to compare the 5 of them considering Kaep played in about 9 games in his life, so every mistake gets choked up to "he'll learn." So in the eyes of the rankers: potential > reality

Accuracy: Cam lacks this in the past but look extremely well in the Seattle game. If anything RGIII was wasaaay off

Durability: lmao is this a joke? Our QB who has gotten rocked countless times, played in all 33 games, and is built like a linebacker is 4th?

Supporting cast: agree for the most part, but are we worse off then the colts?

Urgency: again, im glad they are so sure and confident ranking something that cant be quantified

This list reminds me so much of madden ratings. If u look, they give Jordan Gross a 12 for man coverage and then Ryan Kalil a 15. Wtf?!? Im not saying they should be higher, im just asking how the hell theres a difference between the 2, when uve seen NONE of them do that EVER

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the unnamed random AFC QB coach.....claiming Cam is a me first player at heart. pretty sure no AFC QB coach has ever worked with Newton....

 

Wonder if they meant Chud, but were trying to label him as QB guru?

 

Don't know, just wondering.

 

That said, this is all tied to winning.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lmao wtf is this?

Intelligence? This is clearly an opinion cuz there are zero measurables to compare the 5 of them considering Kaep played in about 9 games in his life, so every mistake gets choked up to "he'll learn." So in the eyes of the rankers: potential > reality

Accuracy: Cam lacks this in the past but look extremely well in the Seattle game. If anything RGIII was wasaaay off

Durability: lmao is this a joke? Our QB who has gotten rocked countless times, played in all 33 games, and is built like a linebacker is 4th?

Supporting cast: agree for the most part, but are we worse off then the colts?

Urgency: again, im glad they are so sure and confident ranking something that cant be quantified

This list reminds me so much of madden ratings. If u look, they give Jordan Gross a 12 for man coverage and then Ryan Kalil a 15. Wtf?!? Im not saying they should be higher, im just asking how the hell theres a difference between the 2, when uve seen NONE of them do that EVER

 

That's an awful example.  The computer auto generates ratings that the position wouldn't be good at when coding, and then they go and fine tune any ratings that they need too. Nobody actually goes in and assigns man and zone coverage ratings for every single Offensive Lineman.  Also, why the fug does it matter? They both suck at it and you would never have them covering a player....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. Until we start winning some games we will get NO respect. And we shouldn't.

Gman said it - it's time to start winning Cam....

Completely agree for the most part. But "Panthers arent winning so that means Cam's not... durable....?"

Such a dumb list. But then again, its getting 10,000's of clicks from pissed off fans. So i guess their plan worked

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point I agree with that list

 

I dont care if Newton has all the ability in the world, until he finds us a way to win I would rank these other guys higher. If rankings were based on ability then J Russell would (and was) the best QB the NFL may have ever seen, but its not about ability - its about the ability to find a way to win and these other guys have.

 

It doesn't matter if it a 'team' game, that ship has sailed..

 

Once the Panthers start winning, these rankings will change.  It's all about winning games, and Cam will unfairly be judged until the Panthers losing ways change.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's an awful example. The computer auto generates ratings that the position wouldn't be good at when coding, and then they go and fine tune any ratings that they need too. Also, why the fug does it matter? They both suck at it and you would never have them covering a player....

Yeah ur making my point for me. The computer should "randomly generate" a 0 for that rating. Or give them both a 10. Im saying, DIFFERENTIATING between the 2 is redic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah ur making my point for me. The computer should "randomly generate" a 0 for that rating. Or give them both a 10. Im saying, DIFFERENTIATING between the 2 is redic

 

You don't understand how coding works do you? They set a range and it assigns an arbitrary number for useless ratings by position.  As in no human ever touches the thing.  As in they give it no thought whatsoever they just let the computer assign a number.  Really not that difficult....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I fully expect them to pick up his 5th year , and they're waiting for him to put a full excellent consistent season of QB play in year 4 or 5. If that don't happen,  they'll eventually cut ties.  Here's to hoping he just goes on a team in 2026. The worst thing he could do is continue to see-saw us to around .500 records because it might be impossible to replace him at that point unless youre willing to do the veteran qb carousel poo we did from 2019 to 2023.   
    • What do you think of Bryce Youngs career thus far? Are you excited about his progress or is it not enough for you? I included a poll of ranking his performance through 3 years thus far.  I personally think he's made some decent progress. Has had some high moments (last half of 2024, Rams game, ATL game in 2025)  but in my mind, those are still outweighed by the many more lowlights thus far (ex turnovers, missed throws, poor decisions)  It's a very mixed bag for me. He's done enough to get a 5th year option but by no means should we lock him in with a 50+ mil a year multi year deal. I want to see him play consistently well for a full year before that happens (yes, I'm still saying that going into year 4. That might be telling).  Just sucks when you see CJ Stroud, Jayden Daniel's, Caleb Williams almost immediately lighting poo up with their arm talent. Maybe Bryce is just an ultra slow burn. I don't know what to think anymore. Guess we're gonna be stuck with him for a whilr unless we end up being bad enough to earn a high pick next year. I doubted it lol. Overall Stats for his career:       ● 14 W - 30L (regular season)       ● 0-1 playoffs record        ● 61.4% completion, 8291 passing yards, 49 TDs, 30 INTs  Year 1:       ● 2 wins, 14 losses      ● 60% completion rate, 2877 passing yards, 11 TD to 10 INTs, 5.5 yards per attempted pass Year 2:        ● 4 wins , 8 losses        ● 60.9% completion rate,  2403 passing yards, 15 TD, 9 INTs,  6.3 yards per attempted pass  Year 3:        ● 8 Wins, 8 Losses         ● 63.6% competition rate, 3011 passing yards, 23 TDs to 11 INTs  Playoffs         ● 1 game in year 3 ( 0 - 1 in playoffs)         ● 21/40 (52.5% completion rate), 264 passing yards, 1 TD, 1 INT. 
    • Raiders receive: 19th overall Xavier Legette Panthers receive: Maxx Crosby 3rd rounder
×
×
  • Create New...