Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cams Attitude


CPcavedweller

Recommended Posts

Not to beat a dead horse but Cams "poor attitude" and how it affects the team has been "well"(not really) documented by the media. This frustration permeates our team and destroys the fabric of comradery. So what does ESPN say of Tom Brady's outburst on Thursday night.(while I agree with his reaction, I do not agree with the double standard)

From ESPN

"His reaction is understandable. He is 36 years old and he's running out of time to build on a Super Bowl résumé that at one time was so perfect, so pristine. He looks around the league and sees the weapons other elite quarterbacks have to highlight their talents, and it has to be irritating."

Link: http://m.espn.go.com/nfl/story?storyId=9667951

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This

Cam wins rings, he can do whatever he wants

Not only does Cam not throw fits, but he handles himself better with much less organizational support as well as actually requiring to be tackled before the whistle is blown. If Brady is touched the refs blow a whistle. If not, he or Jim Harbaugh whines. Having rings has nothing to do with this. Geno could've showed his frustrations through all the drops but he didn't. Brady acts like a spoiled child and I hope he is caught crying when the strongest pinky belonging to a certain Tongan brings him down on a Monday night in November.

It really is mind blowing how Cams towel is interpreted versus Brady's temper tantrums. Think that affects the young receivers confidence? Yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brady whines, cries, yells, talks poo, and yes...if he takes off running for a first down he even pulls out a big first down karate chop if be mood hits him....

But he wins. Therefore all that is cool. It is what it is.

I disagree with most everything you post for various reasons. What part of Brady's play won them the game tonight? ESPN won't talk about his less than 50% completion. No, they will refer to Cams 97.6 QB rating in which he completed 70% of his passes against the Seahawks, yet Cam has not matured in the game enough.

Brady generally wins games, yes. But without Belicheck calling the shots and drafting good defensively the Pats would be 0-2 right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not only does Cam not throw fits, but he handles himself better with much less organizational support as well as actually requiring to be tackled before the whistle is blown. If Brady is touched the refs blow a whistle. If not, he or Jim Harbaugh whines. Having rings has nothing to do with this. Geno could've showed his frustrations through all the drops but he didn't. Brady acts like a spoiled child and I hope he is caught crying when the strongest pinky belonging to a certain Tongan brings him down on a Monday night in November.

It really is mind blowing how Cams towel is interpreted versus Brady's temper tantrums. Think that affects the young receivers confidence? Yes.

Why does Harbaugh whine if Brady is touched and a flag isn't thrown?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tom has 3 rings- he gets a pass.

The double standard if legit, so.is JOAT's post.

There were double standards right within the game last night between Geno and Brady.

I Geno was a little high or low or missed deep they would talk about his accuracy, when Brady did the same it was "OMG TEH RECEIVERS!!1!1!

But he is Tom Brady. He has the resume to give him the benefit of the doubt. Other guys are still proving themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Canales has his msjor issue not doing the obvious regarding running Dowdle but with an average QB we would be in the playoffs with an average QB. 
    • 1. fug TikTak, I ain't clicking that stupid poo. 2. This is really very situationally dependent. Coaching is a huge part but sometimes you step into a scenario where a lot of building needs to happen that is largely out of your control  Recent examples(Last season's hiring cycle): 1. Ben Johnson Johnson chose the OVERWHELMINGLY best open coaching job due to a combination of solid ownership, a solid front office and the most talented roster of the open jobs from that cycle. Negatives were, insanely stacked division. Results have so far indicated that this coaching change has been a massive boost. 2. Mike Vrabel Vrabel went a different direction. He went to a franchise that has solid ownership, a mediocre front office and one of the worst roster in the NFL. However, he has a track record of NFL head coaching success AND lucked into one of the easiest schedules in NFL history(I believe 3rd easiest). Even with that caveat, a clear indicator that coaching has been a huge boost. 3. Pete Carroll Carroll chose one of the NFL's most voliate franchises. Notoriously bad ownership, very bad front office and a terrible roster. But, Carroll is a HOF caliber NFL HC with success at every stop. At the moment, coaching has not been able to overcome the apparent obstacles. In fact, it's been a complete diaster to the extent that Carroll has already fired multiple coaches. One could certainly argue that pethaps Pete has lost his touch but regardless, this coaching change didn't result in a turnaround and Carroll's future there seems in doubt. 4. Aaron Glenn Glenn's first HC opportunity was a doozy. Near worst ownership, a mediocre front office(at best) and a talented core group of players on an underwhelming roster. This experiment has been quite the ride to date. Glenn's personnel decisions have seemingly led to multiple close game losses(2-5 in games decided by one score or less) and the FO decided to have a roster firesale prior to the trade deadline for a wealth of draft capital. The question will be if Glenn will be given the time to actually see this future draft capital realized, now that a significant chunk of the talented core is not longer there. Coaching has not made a difference but is the franchise now setting him up to fail further? 5. Liam Coen Coen picked a mixed bag. Terrible ownership, a remade front office he essentially had a hand in selecting(or at the miminum influenced) and a middling roster. The early results show promise even if the roster shows significant flaws(and Coen shows visible frustration with his "franchise" QB every Sunday). Could be close to turning a 4 win team into a playoff berth. Coaching has mattered. 6. Brian Schottenheimer This was resoundingly viewed as a bad hire but it's also under challenging circumstances. Bad ownership in the sense that the ownership is also the front office, a future Tepper dream I assume. Very talented but very flawed roster. The initial results have been...interesting. A Cowboys team that was a bad 7-10 after a previous streak of three 12 win seasons is now....mediocre? Couple that with wild roster changes prior to the start of the season and up to the trade deadline and it makes for an incomplete picture. It's not much progress but it doesn’t appear to be regressing either. TBD. 6. Kellen Moore Moore chose the most challenging of all openings. The Saints are in the midst of a simulateous roster teardown and attempted rebuild. Decent ownership, a mixed bag in the front office(great at evaluating draft talent, less so in free agency and in salary cap management). The Saints have been awful but, they were expected to be awful. To that note, they were net sellers before the trade deadline. It was reported that Moore secured an agreement that this is long term building effort prior to taking the position so his status seems safe even while the team flounders week to week. Difficult to grade this now as the entire scenario seems to be a long term strategy. TBD.
    • I think he has started to build a culture here.  I think if we had a qb with no limitations we would be seeing a lot more with the offense.  I think most of the coaches that come in and instantly win went to teams that were underachieving previously based on roster talent level.  Based on our roster talent,  we werent underachieving,  we were just bad.
×
×
  • Create New...