Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers - Bills Gameday Thread


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Cam was the only thing that changed in the last drive. He made better decisions(getting rid of the ball when nothing was there), he had better pocket awareness, he stepped into his throws.....

Because the Bills didn't have time to sub and was running the same formation. The receivers were also getting separation on that drive, making decisions easier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What changed is the playcalling. Quick throws, no slow developing routes.

 

 

Yea something we should have done since the first QT. Shula is gong to non adjust Rivera right out of a job. Im still sticking with 9-7 at best but its looking like a sheer climb to that goal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This team has to change their lack of energy on game-days. Our energy suck especially on offense. They come out and play like oh it's just another game, we're going to run what we run and if it works great we probably win... if not it's just another typical lost. No, change the energy and pace

 

IMO it's like that because our coach demeanor and energy is like that. The team always take the attitude of its coach 

 

Coaching goes a long way in the demeanor and energy of the team. I will say though; that the last drive was crucial in turning this game around. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But that's what we should be doing anyway... Slants, drags, screens, quick outs, then hit them with verticals, posts, corners, etc. have to set them up. Also, the coaches need to see that uptempo offenses aren't inherently evil.

They actually work to your advantage as it did for us in the last two mins. The less time you take to get the playcall in, set the play up, get lined up, and run it, the less time you give the defense to key on things and make adjustments.

 

so you're saying that if my OL sucks and most of weapons suck that i shouldn't consistently run plays that are totally and completely dependent on their ability and should perhaps scheme to mask those weaknesses

 

 

well i mean duh why aren't we doing this any good coa...

 

 

 

oh

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I swear if the Panthers start winning consistantly, I seriously don't believe some of you would know what to do with yourselves because u seem to love wearing your doom and gloom glasses long before the damn games are even over.

 

Panthers down 3 points in the second quarter...Game is over. Oh my Gosh, Cam isn't doing something right!!! Game is over.

 

In the meantime...Zod always seems to be doing his best Mike Mayock impersonation when it comes to Cam. Cam is over/under throwing..Cam is not setting his feet....Cam is not stepping into the pocket.... Cam is not fill-in-the blank. While accepting mediocrity from the rest of the team. 

 

Oh wait...The Panthers are now up by four. But there is still lots of time left for you doom and gloom folks to continue playing couch analysts of this game.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea something we should have done since the first QT. Shula is gong to non adjust Rivera right out of a job. Im still sticking with 9-7 at best but its looking like a sheer climb to that goal.

 

Shula over adjusted the first half of this game. After not taking deep throws and opening up the playbook against Seattle, he did it on just about every single play in the first half; which did not allow Cam and Co. to get into a rhythm. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

In the meantime...Zod always seems to be doing his best Mike Mayock impersonation when it comes to Cam. Cam is over/under throwing..Cam is not setting his feet....Cam is not stepping into the pocket.... Cam is not fill-in-the blank. While accepting mediocrity from the rest of the team. 

 

lolwut

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • then why dont teams do that more if the 5th is so valuable?  If thats the case then the bills clearly value moving up 60 spots vs a 5th on a wr or whatever
    • guaranteed for injury only. I know I know he's always hurt. But if he sucks this year or misses more time this year but can pass a physical after the season we can cut him with zero $ on the books. 12.4 isn't much for a corner these days. easy decision in my view to pick up the option.
    • Historic Success Chart  (this chart is nine years old, but it shows the basic pattern of success) The numbers show us the following outline for finding consistent starters: 1st Round - OL (83%) LB (70%) TE (67%) DB (64%) QB (63%) WR (58%) RB (58%) DL (58%) 2nd Round - OL (70%) LB (55%) TE (50%) WR (49%) DB (46%) QB (27%) DL (26%) RB (25%) 3rd Round - OL (40%) TE (39%) LB (34%) DL (27%) WR (25%) DB (24%) QB (17%) RB (16%) 4th Round - DL (37%) TE (33%) OL (29%) LB (16%) WR(12%) DB (11%) RB (11%) QB (8%) 5th Round - TE (32%) DB (17%) WR (16%) OL (16%) DL (13%) RB (9%) LB (4%) QB (0%) 6th Round - TE (26%) OL (16%) DL (13%) WR (9%) DB (8%) RB (6%) LB (5%) QB (0%) 7th Round - DB (11%) OL (9%) QB (6%) WR (5%) DL (3%) LB (2%) RB (0%) TE (0%) https://www.arrowheadpride.com/2015/2/20/8072877/what-the-statistics-tell-us-about-the-draft-by-round Disclaimer:  I realize the first thing some of you will attempt to do is discredit the validity of this empirical study in an attempt to invalidate any conclusions that differ from those you have developed without any degree of exhaustive research or mild inquiry--comparative analysis, data collection, or coding, etc.  So I suppose I should apologize in advance for providing unsubstantiated and unapproved data for our casual consumption; if you'd like, I can get the address for those at Pro Football Reference who are responsible and allow you to contact them or seek compensatory damages.  If this information is still relatively accurate, the probable success rate for our WR selection yesterday should be in the 55-58% range, considering the depth of the position in this year's draft.  FUN FACTS:  For those of you wanting to double dip at WR:  The probability of starting drops in half each round from the second to fourth, and then (strangely) jumps from 12% to 16% in round 5, dropping back down to 9% in round 6...Notice the incredibly high (compared to the others) rate of success for TEs taken in rounds 5 and 6.  TEs drafted in the fifth round nearly double the chance for starting when compared to nearly every other position.  In the sixth round, the chance for TEs becoming a starter is 10% higher than the next highest position--5 times higher than a sixth round LB, for example. Statements that are related to the Panther situation based on this data: If we take a C in round 2 the chances of finding a starter are about three fourths (75%), the chances for drafting a LB in round 3 drops from more than half (55%) to a third (34%).  Finding a starting CB in the third round (opposed to the second) would drop from nearly half (46%) to a quarter (24%). If we take a LB in round 2, the chances of finding a starter are just over a half (55%).  Finding a starting CB in the third round (opposed to the second) would drop from nearly half (50%) to a quarter (24%).  Finding a starting C in the third would drop from 75% to 40%. If we take a CB in round 2, the chances of finding a starter are about 50%.  the chances of finding a starting C would drop from 75% to 40% in round 3.  The chances for drafting a LB in round 3 drops from more than half (55%) to a third (34%) So what scenario gives us the highest percentage of finding 2 players in rounds 2 and 3 that give us the highest likelihood for finding starters? Round 2: Center 75%, LB 55%, CB, 50% Round 3:  Center 40%, LB 34%, and CB 24% Other tips DAY 3:  This is when you draft the TE.  Between rounds 4-6, the percentage of finding a starter drops from 33% (rd 4) to 32% (rd. 5) to 26% (rd. 6). Recommendation: Draft your TE round 5. Round 4:  This is when you draft a Defensive Lineman.  37% chance of becoming a starter.  That is 10% higher than the third round and 24% higher than the fifth round. Round 5: The best round for drafting WR on day 3 (16% chance of starting). Round 7:  Draft a defensive back.  There is a one-in-nine chance of finding a starter--11%.  PROGNOSIS:  Based on this draft,  If we draft Center (rd 2) and ILB (rd 3) and have the best chance of producing two starters 54.5% If we draft LB (rd 2) and Center (rd. 3) the chance for producing 2 starters is 47.5%. If we draft a CB (rd 2) and LB (rd 3), the chance for producing 2 starters is 42%. If we draft a LB (rd 2) and CB (rd 3) the chance for producing 2 starters is 39.5%.* * in my opinion, based on the depth of this draft, this is probably what the Panthers will do-- At any rate, this is not law or current, but it does give you some ideas--hope you enjoy it.  
×
×
  • Create New...