Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Coaching Staff Installed Second Half Plays to Try to Win it


Jase

Recommended Posts

It was pretty obvious  that the deangelo williams wildcat plays were an attempt by the coaching staff to mix things up in the second half, in hopes that the bills' defense would be caught off guard enough to put enough points on the board to win it.

 

The trouble is, the Bills would have already been prepared to stop it, if they prepared to stop Cam's read option.  Running wildcat instead simply makes it easier to stop, because there is no threat of deangelo throwing the ball out of the formation.

 

Instead, the coaching staff telegraphed these run plays to the defense, and took Cam out of the offense completely.  The Bills had little trouble containing it.

 

Is this the best Shula can do, wrinkle-wise?

 

Do you think the players are still happy with a "simplified" offense?  Or is it finally sinking in that simpler offense = simpler to defend?

 

Simple offenses work in one situation: When you are so dominant on the offensive line that the defense knows what is coming, but still cannot stop it.

 

Look at college ball as an example:  Alabama runs an incredibly simple offense.  Because they have the raw talent up front to impose their will on any defense.  Teams without this luxury are almost always the ones with gimmicky offenses.

 

We need to acknowledge that Cam is not a pocket passer behind a line that isn't consistent enough  to pick up 5-6 rushers on a regular basis.  At a minimum, we need more designed roll outs, more read option runs to cam, and more throws out of the read option.

 

Are you listening Shula?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Second half adjustments are a problem but it's not the reason we keep losing these close games. It's really not. We are losing because of Rivera's situational playcalling. The 4th and 1's etc that he doesn't have the balls to go for when we need to.

 

He has no feel for momentum at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

We need to acknowledge that Cam is not a pocket passer behind a line that isn't consistent enough  to pick up 5-6 rushers on a regular basis.  At a minimum, we need more designed roll outs, more read option runs to cam, and more throws out of the read option.

 

 

 

 

Yes

 

 

 

Are you listening Shula?

 

 

 

No

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shula listened last week, but what he got out of it was "be more aggressive" and decided that meant running plays that took ages to develop down field, regardless of the ability of our line to block their guys.

 

I estimate he will read this thread and decide to run the read option every single play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Second half adjustments are a problem but it's not the reason we keep losing these close games. It's really not. We are losing because of Rivera's situational playcalling. The 4th and 1's etc that he doesn't have the balls to go for when we need to.

 

He has no feel for momentum at all.

 

Second half adjustments have been an issue with this team for a lot longer than Rivera has been head coach.

 

That being said, Ron Rivera is nothing more or better than John Fox v2.0.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shula listened last week, but what he got out of it was "be more aggressive" and decided that meant running plays that took ages to develop down field, regardless of the ability of our line to block their guys.

 

I estimate he will read this thread and decide to run the read option every single play.

 

I'd be curious to see a breakdown of how many deep attempts came from under center vs shotgun.

 

I think the answer is that far more came from behind center this week, which puts cam at a severe disadvantage behind this line.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

note below that Williams had 0 catches in the game.  Throwing to the RB has been something this team has refused to do for some reason for as long as I can remember.  Not sure why we can't make a decent screen pass, or throw to the flat.  It's as though JR has mandated that we're only allowed to run plays designed back when he played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shula listened last week, but what he got out of it was "be more aggressive" and decided that meant running plays that took ages to develop down field, regardless of the ability of our line to block their guys.

 

I estimate he will read this thread and decide to run the read option every single play.

 

and then our 2min offense was fast and efficient...so we had to go back to long passes, and runs up the middle for the second half.  Oy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was pretty obvious  that the deangelo williams wildcat plays were an attempt by the coaching staff to mix things up in the second half, in hopes that the bills' defense would be caught off guard enough to put enough points on the board to win it.

 

The trouble is, the Bills would have already been prepared to stop it, if they prepared to stop Cam's read option.  Running wildcat instead simply makes it easier to stop, because there is no threat of deangelo throwing the ball out of the formation.

 

Instead, the coaching staff telegraphed these run plays to the defense, and took Cam out of the offense completely.  The Bills had little trouble containing it.

 

Is this the best Shula can do, wrinkle-wise?

 

Do you think the players are still happy with a "simplified" offense?  Or is it finally sinking in that simpler offense = simpler to defend?

 

Simple offenses work in one situation: When you are so dominant on the offensive line that the defense knows what is coming, but still cannot stop it.

 

Look at college ball as an example:  Alabama runs an incredibly simple offense.  Because they have the raw talent up front to impose their will on any defense.  Teams without this luxury are almost always the ones with gimmicky offenses.

 

We need to acknowledge that Cam is not a pocket passer behind a line that isn't consistent enough  to pick up 5-6 rushers on a regular basis.  At a minimum, we need more designed roll outs, more read option runs to cam, and more throws out of the read option.

 

Are you listening Shula?

 

 

Hell no he isn't. That asshole is so conservative, the only way to get his attention on the internet is to post in an AOL chatroom,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A winning record would be nice, but I still have us winning around the 6 to 8 game mark. Realistically we should beat the Jets and Saints, that gets us to 5 wins. After that, we have to face a lot of potential play off teams and our divisional opponents. I think we’ll win 1 or 2 of those games to take us to 6 or 7 wins, perhaps 8 wins if we can spring a further surprise.  Is that enough progress for head coach and QB? I’m not sure, it will depend on performances and output. That said, it’s nice to be back in a position where we are thinking about the play offs.
    • I would tend to agree about not falling into the trap and paying a below average QB, but sometimes situations can “force” a team to pay that QB. For example, if we play ourselves into a 9-8 like record, then what options will we have in the draft? Or do we avoid the draft and trade for or sign someone in free agency?  I’m not convinced by the 2026 QB draft class. There’s some intriguing prospects but no one that really screams “draft me”. I’m not sure we’ve got anyone really that stands out as a trade candidate or free agent signing. So although we might not want to commit a big money contract to Young, him playing well and showing progress might force the team’s hand. 
    • Realistically we would be looking at no more than a mid round pick for Dowdle or Chuba. Are we really that desperate for a mid round pick? Not really. I would much prefer us utilise the two RBs in a 1-2 punch similar to how we used D-Will and Stewart. After all, Bryce is not Drew Brees. He won’t throw for 300+ yards and carry the team consistently as a passer. So having a strong running game with a 1-2 punch will be beneficial to him, and it will also be beneficial to the RBs because we can spell them and not overwork them.
×
×
  • Create New...