Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Coaching Staff Installed Second Half Plays to Try to Win it


Jase

Recommended Posts

It was pretty obvious  that the deangelo williams wildcat plays were an attempt by the coaching staff to mix things up in the second half, in hopes that the bills' defense would be caught off guard enough to put enough points on the board to win it.

 

The trouble is, the Bills would have already been prepared to stop it, if they prepared to stop Cam's read option.  Running wildcat instead simply makes it easier to stop, because there is no threat of deangelo throwing the ball out of the formation.

 

Instead, the coaching staff telegraphed these run plays to the defense, and took Cam out of the offense completely.  The Bills had little trouble containing it.

 

Is this the best Shula can do, wrinkle-wise?

 

Do you think the players are still happy with a "simplified" offense?  Or is it finally sinking in that simpler offense = simpler to defend?

 

Simple offenses work in one situation: When you are so dominant on the offensive line that the defense knows what is coming, but still cannot stop it.

 

Look at college ball as an example:  Alabama runs an incredibly simple offense.  Because they have the raw talent up front to impose their will on any defense.  Teams without this luxury are almost always the ones with gimmicky offenses.

 

We need to acknowledge that Cam is not a pocket passer behind a line that isn't consistent enough  to pick up 5-6 rushers on a regular basis.  At a minimum, we need more designed roll outs, more read option runs to cam, and more throws out of the read option.

 

Are you listening Shula?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Second half adjustments are a problem but it's not the reason we keep losing these close games. It's really not. We are losing because of Rivera's situational playcalling. The 4th and 1's etc that he doesn't have the balls to go for when we need to.

 

He has no feel for momentum at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

We need to acknowledge that Cam is not a pocket passer behind a line that isn't consistent enough  to pick up 5-6 rushers on a regular basis.  At a minimum, we need more designed roll outs, more read option runs to cam, and more throws out of the read option.

 

 

 

 

Yes

 

 

 

Are you listening Shula?

 

 

 

No

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shula listened last week, but what he got out of it was "be more aggressive" and decided that meant running plays that took ages to develop down field, regardless of the ability of our line to block their guys.

 

I estimate he will read this thread and decide to run the read option every single play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Second half adjustments are a problem but it's not the reason we keep losing these close games. It's really not. We are losing because of Rivera's situational playcalling. The 4th and 1's etc that he doesn't have the balls to go for when we need to.

 

He has no feel for momentum at all.

 

Second half adjustments have been an issue with this team for a lot longer than Rivera has been head coach.

 

That being said, Ron Rivera is nothing more or better than John Fox v2.0.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shula listened last week, but what he got out of it was "be more aggressive" and decided that meant running plays that took ages to develop down field, regardless of the ability of our line to block their guys.

 

I estimate he will read this thread and decide to run the read option every single play.

 

I'd be curious to see a breakdown of how many deep attempts came from under center vs shotgun.

 

I think the answer is that far more came from behind center this week, which puts cam at a severe disadvantage behind this line.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

note below that Williams had 0 catches in the game.  Throwing to the RB has been something this team has refused to do for some reason for as long as I can remember.  Not sure why we can't make a decent screen pass, or throw to the flat.  It's as though JR has mandated that we're only allowed to run plays designed back when he played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shula listened last week, but what he got out of it was "be more aggressive" and decided that meant running plays that took ages to develop down field, regardless of the ability of our line to block their guys.

 

I estimate he will read this thread and decide to run the read option every single play.

 

and then our 2min offense was fast and efficient...so we had to go back to long passes, and runs up the middle for the second half.  Oy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was pretty obvious  that the deangelo williams wildcat plays were an attempt by the coaching staff to mix things up in the second half, in hopes that the bills' defense would be caught off guard enough to put enough points on the board to win it.

 

The trouble is, the Bills would have already been prepared to stop it, if they prepared to stop Cam's read option.  Running wildcat instead simply makes it easier to stop, because there is no threat of deangelo throwing the ball out of the formation.

 

Instead, the coaching staff telegraphed these run plays to the defense, and took Cam out of the offense completely.  The Bills had little trouble containing it.

 

Is this the best Shula can do, wrinkle-wise?

 

Do you think the players are still happy with a "simplified" offense?  Or is it finally sinking in that simpler offense = simpler to defend?

 

Simple offenses work in one situation: When you are so dominant on the offensive line that the defense knows what is coming, but still cannot stop it.

 

Look at college ball as an example:  Alabama runs an incredibly simple offense.  Because they have the raw talent up front to impose their will on any defense.  Teams without this luxury are almost always the ones with gimmicky offenses.

 

We need to acknowledge that Cam is not a pocket passer behind a line that isn't consistent enough  to pick up 5-6 rushers on a regular basis.  At a minimum, we need more designed roll outs, more read option runs to cam, and more throws out of the read option.

 

Are you listening Shula?

 

 

Hell no he isn't. That asshole is so conservative, the only way to get his attention on the internet is to post in an AOL chatroom,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...