Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Coaching Staff Installed Second Half Plays to Try to Win it


Jase

Recommended Posts

It was pretty obvious  that the deangelo williams wildcat plays were an attempt by the coaching staff to mix things up in the second half, in hopes that the bills' defense would be caught off guard enough to put enough points on the board to win it.

 

The trouble is, the Bills would have already been prepared to stop it, if they prepared to stop Cam's read option.  Running wildcat instead simply makes it easier to stop, because there is no threat of deangelo throwing the ball out of the formation.

 

Instead, the coaching staff telegraphed these run plays to the defense, and took Cam out of the offense completely.  The Bills had little trouble containing it.

 

Is this the best Shula can do, wrinkle-wise?

 

Do you think the players are still happy with a "simplified" offense?  Or is it finally sinking in that simpler offense = simpler to defend?

 

Simple offenses work in one situation: When you are so dominant on the offensive line that the defense knows what is coming, but still cannot stop it.

 

Look at college ball as an example:  Alabama runs an incredibly simple offense.  Because they have the raw talent up front to impose their will on any defense.  Teams without this luxury are almost always the ones with gimmicky offenses.

 

We need to acknowledge that Cam is not a pocket passer behind a line that isn't consistent enough  to pick up 5-6 rushers on a regular basis.  At a minimum, we need more designed roll outs, more read option runs to cam, and more throws out of the read option.

 

Are you listening Shula?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Second half adjustments are a problem but it's not the reason we keep losing these close games. It's really not. We are losing because of Rivera's situational playcalling. The 4th and 1's etc that he doesn't have the balls to go for when we need to.

 

He has no feel for momentum at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

We need to acknowledge that Cam is not a pocket passer behind a line that isn't consistent enough  to pick up 5-6 rushers on a regular basis.  At a minimum, we need more designed roll outs, more read option runs to cam, and more throws out of the read option.

 

 

 

 

Yes

 

 

 

Are you listening Shula?

 

 

 

No

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shula listened last week, but what he got out of it was "be more aggressive" and decided that meant running plays that took ages to develop down field, regardless of the ability of our line to block their guys.

 

I estimate he will read this thread and decide to run the read option every single play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Second half adjustments are a problem but it's not the reason we keep losing these close games. It's really not. We are losing because of Rivera's situational playcalling. The 4th and 1's etc that he doesn't have the balls to go for when we need to.

 

He has no feel for momentum at all.

 

Second half adjustments have been an issue with this team for a lot longer than Rivera has been head coach.

 

That being said, Ron Rivera is nothing more or better than John Fox v2.0.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shula listened last week, but what he got out of it was "be more aggressive" and decided that meant running plays that took ages to develop down field, regardless of the ability of our line to block their guys.

 

I estimate he will read this thread and decide to run the read option every single play.

 

I'd be curious to see a breakdown of how many deep attempts came from under center vs shotgun.

 

I think the answer is that far more came from behind center this week, which puts cam at a severe disadvantage behind this line.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

note below that Williams had 0 catches in the game.  Throwing to the RB has been something this team has refused to do for some reason for as long as I can remember.  Not sure why we can't make a decent screen pass, or throw to the flat.  It's as though JR has mandated that we're only allowed to run plays designed back when he played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shula listened last week, but what he got out of it was "be more aggressive" and decided that meant running plays that took ages to develop down field, regardless of the ability of our line to block their guys.

 

I estimate he will read this thread and decide to run the read option every single play.

 

and then our 2min offense was fast and efficient...so we had to go back to long passes, and runs up the middle for the second half.  Oy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was pretty obvious  that the deangelo williams wildcat plays were an attempt by the coaching staff to mix things up in the second half, in hopes that the bills' defense would be caught off guard enough to put enough points on the board to win it.

 

The trouble is, the Bills would have already been prepared to stop it, if they prepared to stop Cam's read option.  Running wildcat instead simply makes it easier to stop, because there is no threat of deangelo throwing the ball out of the formation.

 

Instead, the coaching staff telegraphed these run plays to the defense, and took Cam out of the offense completely.  The Bills had little trouble containing it.

 

Is this the best Shula can do, wrinkle-wise?

 

Do you think the players are still happy with a "simplified" offense?  Or is it finally sinking in that simpler offense = simpler to defend?

 

Simple offenses work in one situation: When you are so dominant on the offensive line that the defense knows what is coming, but still cannot stop it.

 

Look at college ball as an example:  Alabama runs an incredibly simple offense.  Because they have the raw talent up front to impose their will on any defense.  Teams without this luxury are almost always the ones with gimmicky offenses.

 

We need to acknowledge that Cam is not a pocket passer behind a line that isn't consistent enough  to pick up 5-6 rushers on a regular basis.  At a minimum, we need more designed roll outs, more read option runs to cam, and more throws out of the read option.

 

Are you listening Shula?

 

 

Hell no he isn't. That asshole is so conservative, the only way to get his attention on the internet is to post in an AOL chatroom,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's be completely honest about this... Our WR room is AT and a bunch of question marks. Thielen is the only guy we know who knows the route tree completely, understands play calls and can regularly get open/beat close coverage when necessary. He's long in the tooth, isn't the speediest guy on the field but he plays like a pro, starting level wide receiver. Xavier, last season looked great at first, but man he kind of petered out down the stretch and would disappear in a number of games. He wasn't reliable on routes or getting open and where he was supposed to be a king at contested catches, he often looked a bit intimidated. I'm not saying he's a washout by any means. Anyone with his size, speed and catch radius could make it big in the NFL, but can he do it? He'll need to show more than he did in the preseason before we can really rely on him as a WR1 or WR2.  Coker was a revelation last season, he really played way above his (non)draft status and flashed multiple times in games and was a steady performer. What we need to find out, though, is whether he was benefiting from being an unknown that wasn't getting maximum effort from opposing DBs or if he was just outworking and outhustling everyone on the field. We should find out this season. We sure as hell didn't find out much in the pre-season (from him or any receiver or QB for that matter). He's still a question mark, but I think he has the look of the real deal. He might be this generation's next Thielen. Now, let's talk about Tet. High first round draft pick, first true WR off the board this year. Stellar career out west in college. Has the swagger of the WR1. And man, y'all are going to get mad about this but... he comes across as a mook. And in the pre-season he performed, well, not so great against poor opposition of second and third stringers. Yeah, he caught that one moonshot ball in the first game but really, nothing else lighting the place up. Rookie endzone drop in that game, too. He's still young and adjusting, I'm sure, but I was hoping to see something of a breakthrough kind of guy. I'm still looking. Hunter Renfro? Gosh, I hope he can make the team and make a comeback to his old form. It would be such a great story. But maybe neither one of those happens. We won't know until Tuesday and then, if he makes it past there it could be weeks. So, TL;DR: AT is all we can bank on right now. We couldn't afford to let him go considering the number of unknowns we'd be throwing out there for our QB, who himself is still an unknown. One thing to add: Our receivers coaching group has their work cut out for them. I hope they are up to the task, but the pre-season gave me little reason to believe in them. And I really need something to believe in here in Carolina.  
    • Same I think Randsom is a baller..... hopefully we don't have to suffer through 4-8 games of Scott blowing azz to get him on the feild.
    • Linebacker is the biggest need - I hope we figure out a way to address it. Krys Barnes is the only one who even moderately flashed.  Super nervous about Trevin/Rozeboom as a duo (Still like Trevin) I'd be excited if we had a better vet to mentor Trevin.  Or a better younger guy to support Rozeboom.  They just don't fit well and it may be a big problem against the run, even with our DL much improved. 
×
×
  • Create New...