Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The NFC is so bad that the Panthers are a half game out of the wildcard


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

This is amazing to me. Current playoff standings a quarter of the way through the season are:

 

1. Seattle (4-0) (over New Orleans due to strength of victory)

2. New Orleans (3-0)

3. Detroit (3-1) (over Chicago due to head-to-head)

4. Dallas (2-2)

5. Chicago (3-1)

6. San Francisco (2-2) (over Arizona due to NFC West record)

---

7. Arizona (2-2)

8. Green Bay (1-2) (over Carolina due to strength of victory)

9. Carolina (1-2)

 

So if we can improve even just a little, we could be a shoo-in for a wild card spot. Even if we play .500 football, we're going to stay in the hunt at least through the end of the regular season.

 

Also, if you guys weren't aware, we're now #3 in total scoring defense!

 

2 good weeks in a row!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is amazing to me. Current playoff standings a quarter of the way through the season are:

 

1. Seattle (4-0) (over New Orleans due to strength of victory)

2. New Orleans (3-0)

3. Detroit (3-1) (over Chicago due to head-to-head)

4. Dallas (2-2)

5. Chicago (3-1)

6. San Francisco (2-2) (over Arizona due to NFC West record)

---

7. Arizona (2-2)

8. Green Bay (1-2) (over Carolina due to strength of victory)

9. Carolina (1-2)

 

So if we can improve even just a little, we could be a shoo-in for a wild card spot. Even if we play .500 football, we're going to stay in the hunt at least through the end of the regular season.

 

Also, if you guys weren't aware, we're now #3 in total scoring defense!

 

2 good weeks in a row!

 

Because we play Arizona and SF we actually control our own destiny (well almost). Usually if you are behind 3 other teams they can simply match you record and go to the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if we win this weekend against AZ we will be 2-2.

Then hopefully GB will lose to DET, and San Fran loses to HOU.

Kinda weird situation with CHI and NO. If CHI loses we move closer to a wildcard, if CHI wins we move closer to winning the division.

Either way if this happens we could be 6th/7th in NFC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

umm...we're not even a 1/4 of the way through the sesason, even the Giants are only 2 games out.

 

Yeah this is the real issue. At this point last year the Cards were 4-0, they won a single game the rest of the year. It's way too early to worry about records.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still keeping my expectations tempered. Giants are actually even worse then I had originally thought they were...So I dont know how much that game really meant. I want to see us pull some big wins. It's great to still have a shot though. If only we had beat the Seahawks, honestly...it pains me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...