Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Melvin White made Vincent Jackson his bitch


Bloodflood

Recommended Posts

I'm going to be called out for this and, admittedly, it may be nit-picking, but....

 

The DBs are very good at not allowing YAC, they are making the tackles, but they are not defending the passes. There were 3 sacks and most of the time the Panthers were collapsing the Tampa Bay pocket, but Glennon still completed 60% of his 50 passes. Consider the blatant drops and the total airmailed passes, he still completed 60% of his passes with no running game beyond the rookie James, one healthy WR in Jackson, an injured Mike Williams and another rookie WR.

 

Mitchell cannot be moved from free safety. Too many times was he literally the last line of defense and made a perfect form tackle. Not the all-too-familiar "hit 'em and hope they go down" instead of wrap and tackle.

 

I'm a little hesitant about singing the praises of this group of DBs after beating a winless team, rookie QB in his 4th career start, rookie RB in his 1st career start, one healthy veteran WR and a coach seemingly on life support just waiting for the front office to unplug him.

 

Let's watch the next 3 weeks against Atlanta, SF and New England and if we're able to smile afterwards and keep the same feelings about this group of DBs, then all is well. But I have a feeling there will be more question marks then exclamation points after the next three weeks.

 

that's more than fair...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to be called out for this and, admittedly, it may be nit-picking, but....

 

The DBs are very good at not allowing YAC, they are making the tackles, but they are not defending the passes. There were 3 sacks and most of the time the Panthers were collapsing the Tampa Bay pocket, but Glennon still completed 60% of his 50 passes. Consider the blatant drops and the total airmailed passes, he still completed 60% of his passes with no running game beyond the rookie James, one healthy WR in Jackson, an injured Mike Williams and another rookie WR.

 

Mitchell cannot be moved from free safety. Too many times was he literally the last line of defense and made a perfect form tackle. Not the all-too-familiar "hit 'em and hope they go down" instead of wrap and tackle.

 

I'm a little hesitant about singing the praises of this group of DBs after beating a winless team, rookie QB in his 4th career start, rookie RB in his 1st career start, one healthy veteran WR and a coach seemingly on life support just waiting for the front office to unplug him.

 

Let's watch the next 3 weeks against Atlanta, SF and New England and if we're able to smile afterwards and keep the same feelings about this group of DBs, then all is well. But I have a feeling there will be more question marks then exclamation points after the next three weeks.

 

i see your point, but if we're complaining about allowing a 58% completion rate then we've got something pretty special going on. remember also that a huge chunk of glennon's yards came during 4th-quarter garbage time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to be called out for this and, admittedly, it may be nit-picking, but....

The DBs are very good at not allowing YAC, they are making the tackles, but they are not defending the passes. There were 3 sacks and most of the time the Panthers were collapsing the Tampa Bay pocket, but Glennon still completed 60% of his 50 passes. Consider the blatant drops and the total airmailed passes, he still completed 60% of his passes with no running game beyond the rookie James, one healthy WR in Jackson, an injured Mike Williams and another rookie WR.

Mitchell cannot be moved from free safety. Too many times was he literally the last line of defense and made a perfect form tackle. Not the all-too-familiar "hit 'em and hope they go down" instead of wrap and tackle.

I'm a little hesitant about singing the praises of this group of DBs after beating a winless team, rookie QB in his 4th career start, rookie RB in his 1st career start, one healthy veteran WR and a coach seemingly on life support just waiting for the front office to unplug him.

Let's watch the next 3 weeks against Atlanta, SF and New England and if we're able to smile afterwards and keep the same feelings about this group of DBs, then all is well. But I have a feeling there will be more question marks then exclamation points after the next three weeks.

It was just an example of what happens when the pass rush doesn't get there.....we get exposed. The pass rush won't be in their game every game for 16 weeks.

RR's secondary scheme is about allowing some passes and then attacking preventing YAC. It is also about sitting back and playing the ball often and not the WR. It is very effective when the pass rush is on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder what happens this offseason though.

 

Distinct possibility some guys may be let go from or decide to leave the Giants after this year's disaster of a season.

 

I'd certainly welcome them here.

 

 

it makes sense Gettleman could make a few changes he sees as improvements..  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it makes sense Gettleman could make a few changes he sees as improvements..  

 

This year he stated he didn't wanna be the guy who came in and threw everyone out for his own guys.

 

But next offseason, after a year's worth of evaluation, i could see some changes.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i see your point, but if we're complaining about allowing a 58% completion rate then we've got something pretty special going on. remember also that a huge chunk of glennon's yards came during 4th-quarter garbage time.

 

Well, he was 30/50, which is 60% as I mentioned, not 58. And if you throw in the out-and-out drops, we're talking about 65%- does that make it more relevant as a point of discussion? I think not.

 

A 60% completion rate is not being achieved by more than half the starting QBs in the league right now, so it's not an insignificant number. And, again, against a winless team, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This year he stated he didn't wanna be the guy who came in and threw everyone out for his own guys.

 

But next offseason, after a year's worth of evaluation, i could see some changes.

 

 

he also said the current crew was a good one, but its likely that's GM speak for the very reason you stated above..  we'll see.  Keep drafting studs and we'll be sitting pretty in a few years after these draft picks start developing into vets..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to be called out for this and, admittedly, it may be nit-picking, but....

 

The DBs are very good at not allowing YAC, they are making the tackles, but they are not defending the passes. There were 3 sacks and most of the time the Panthers were collapsing the Tampa Bay pocket, but Glennon still completed 60% of his 50 passes. Consider the blatant drops and the total airmailed passes, he still completed 60% of his passes with no running game beyond the rookie James, one healthy WR in Jackson, an injured Mike Williams and another rookie WR.

 

Mitchell cannot be moved from free safety. Too many times was he literally the last line of defense and made a perfect form tackle. Not the all-too-familiar "hit 'em and hope they go down" instead of wrap and tackle.

 

I'm a little hesitant about singing the praises of this group of DBs after beating a winless team, rookie QB in his 4th career start, rookie RB in his 1st career start, one healthy veteran WR and a coach seemingly on life support just waiting for the front office to unplug him.

 

Let's watch the next 3 weeks against Atlanta, SF and New England and if we're able to smile afterwards and keep the same feelings about this group of DBs, then all is well. But I have a feeling there will be more question marks then exclamation points after the next three weeks.

i agree, we should stay mum about our defense, and offense for that matter.  since that's the case, we'll see you in 3 or 4 weeks.  ciao!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...