Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Was Losing Godfrey The Biggest Step In Turning The Defense Around?


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

It's been on my mind quite a bit over the last few games...  I was a huge detractor of Godfrey's for awhile, but it appeared to me that he had improved quite a bit over the last two seasons or so.  But, I was still unhappy with the sense that he still had not had to EARN his spot under either Fox's or Rivera's regime.  Well, he goes down with injury and we have several different guys step in and contribute so much so that Godfrey has become an afterthought.

 

Do you think losing him was the biggest step in turning around our defense?  Or at the very least, turning around the problems we have historically had in the secondary?

 

I think it's in bad taste to put that much of the onus on Godfrey, but I think it's a relevant discussion to be had.  No doubt, there are multiple reasons that our defense is this good, but do you think they'd be THIS good if he was still back there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before we lost him I would have never agreed with the idea.

 

Seeing how our defense has played this year after being sure that our secondary was going to cost us basically every game?  I think losing that entrenched starter and allowing the coaches to play around with the secondary to find the best group of players has been a welcome surprise.

 

We certainly don't have an all-world secondary but they've getting the job done more than they're not and it'd be hard to argue that Godfrey's departure didn't help that along.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been a big Godfrey fan here. Got into some arguments w/ fellow posters regarding Godfrey during the past couple of seasons.

 

with that being said, I think there's a very strong possibility he's played his last game here. He's making a lot of money and there's been players step up behind him who've played at a very high level making a shitload less than he is.

 

Mitchell and Lester have both been excellent additions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no, only elite safeties make that much of an impact.

 

I don't know...

 

It just seemed that a great deal of our problems in coverage were safeties not being where they were supposed to be, or just not executing their assignments well in general.

 

If you have that many blown coverages, it definitely takes its toll on the defense as a whole.

 

I saw huge improvement from Godfrey as a tackler over the last two seasons, and he transformed himself into somewhat of a big-hitter...  That being said, he still seemed to get over the top to help way too late, way too often.  For all of his athleticism, he just always seemed to lack good instincts for the safety position.

 

Obviously, that's all just my opinion and there are many other factors at play here, but I'm so proud of the way our guys are playing back there, especially considering how no one expected Mitchell to be a dependable starter after the preseason and many, including myself, completely wrote Lester off as a career practice squad guy.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...