Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sheldon Richardson "making" some noise. Says he'd go #1 in re-do


top dawg

Recommended Posts

I keep seeing Huddlers saying "Richardson is good...surprisingly"

This is why you do not work in an NFL office and post on the internets. These GMs, scouts and most draft experts are kinda ok at this.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

 

There's busts and steals every year.  Always has been, always will be.  If we can't sit around and talk out of our asses about baseless speculation, then what's the point of this board?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Admittedly, I've really only paid close attention to one Jet game, and that was the last one against Oakland.

 

At least in that game, Richardson didn't really stand out to me. The ones that did were Coples (rush LB'er) and Pace (DL).

 

The Jets have a damn good front 7 and can create lots of pressure. Luckily, their offense is not too scary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richardson has 66 tackles and 3.5 sacks. Excellent numbers for a DT, not to mention a rookie DT.

Well his numbers are abnormal to us because he's really paying DE in a lot of their packages, so I wouldn't really count him as a DT.  Nonetheless, it would be hard to argue that he or Star wouldn't get #1 overall if there was a redraft, at least a redraft based upon immediate impact.  At the same time, I couldn't tell you if Eric Fisher and Luke Jockel are doing well or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Admittedly, I've really only paid close attention to one Jet game, and that was the last one against Oakland.

At least in that game, Richardson didn't really stand out to me. The ones that did were Coples (rush LB'er) and Pace (DL).

The Jets have a damn good front 7 and can create lots of pressure. Luckily, their offense is not too scary.

He's a defensive lineman in a 3 man front. His production isn't supposed to be expressed in stats

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well his numbers are abnormal to us because he's really paying DE in a lot of their packages, so I wouldn't really count him as a DT.  Nonetheless, it would be hard to argue that he or Star wouldn't get #1 overall if there was a redraft, at least a redraft based upon immediate impact.  At the same time, I couldn't tell you if Eric Fisher and Luke Jockel are doing well or not.

Good point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well his numbers are abnormal to us because he's really paying DE in a lot of their packages, so I wouldn't really count him as a DT.  Nonetheless, it would be hard to argue that he or Star wouldn't get #1 overall if there was a redraft, at least a redraft based upon immediate impact.  At the same time, I couldn't tell you if Eric Fisher and Luke Jockel are doing well or not.

 

Please don't tell me he'll be lined up against bell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep seeing Huddlers saying "Richardson is good...surprisingly"

This is why you do not work in an NFL office and post on the internets. These GMs, scouts and most draft experts are kinda ok at this.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

 

This same thing was said through the Hurney years. Look what happened lolll

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's a defensive lineman in a 3 man front. His production isn't supposed to be expressed in stats

 

Yeah, I wasn't really speaking from a stats standpoint. It had more to do with the eyeball test as to whether or not he was disruptive, and how he did versus the run.

 

For at least that 1 game, he didn't really stand out in either area. I'm sure he's had plenty of other games in which he did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And really, it should be 4 reasons with the last one being that there were ZERO other offensive weapons on that team in 2024, opposing defenses only had to worry about one player all year long and they constantly double and triple teamed him right off the snap all season.  In 2023, we still had Jacob Cowing who had 90 catches that year and was drafted by the 49ers last year, so teams couldn't just send everyone after T-Mac on every passing down.
    • I wonder if the Hornets view Kon and McNeeley more as forwards and plan to ship off Green/Okogie/Smith for center help. I hope they don’t plan to ship off Sexton as I like what he brings to the team. (2) G - Ball, Mann, Simpson (two-way) (3) G - Sexton, Dinwiddie, Connaughton (3) F - Miller, Knueppel, McNeeley, James (two-way) (3) F - Bridges, Williams, Salaun (3) C - Diabate, Kalkbrenner, Plumlee
    • 3 main reasons he was better in 2023 and none of them concern me for his NFL prospects 1. Totally new coaching staff that was a massive downgrade and had god awful play calling and designs, the entire fan base was ready to run the coaching staff out of town a month into their first season and the play caller ended up getting changed because it was so bad. 2. Along with the staff downgrade, his QB played significantly worse after being the Pac 12 Freshman of the Year in 2023.  Constantly missed T-Mac when he was wide open, lost out on a number of TDs and a good amount of yardage, half the time T-Mac still almost made miraculous catches on the bad passes too. 3. He hurt his ankle over the summer and missed all of fall camp only to return to practice a few days before the season started and I think he had to deal with it all season long and was slightly limping at times mid season too, but kept fighting through it to still be a 1st team All American.
×
×
  • Create New...