Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Assuming we get the bye, who do you want?


stirs

Recommended Posts

Philly

Dallas

Green Bay

Chicago

San Fran

AZ

 

At home, I worry only about Philly, hoping they lose tonight

 

Chicago or Dallas.

GB will have Rodgers back by then and fug that.

 

AZ is playing crazy good.

SF is a lot scarier than last time, but I'd take them 3rd on that list, tied with Philly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im not scared of new orleans. id love to destroy that dirty group of scumbags again.

that said you tend to orientate yourself more to some of the other ones when asked.

still work to do though to make this even a question. gotta focus on crushing the Turds this week.

i freakin hate Atlanta.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  1. Dallas (poo tier defense)
  2. Chicago (Can't stop the run at all)
  3. Green Bay (Lots of injuries, poor defense. Still have Lacy/Rodgers)
  4. Philly (Matchup problems here)
  5. Arizona (We saw how this went the first time, maybe take them over Philly now though)
  6. San Francisco (Tough mirror matchup)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it was fear of the unknown because he tried to hide the extent of the injuries that made him drop. After the drop, the reports I heard were that teams knew what was wrong with his knee and it was something similar to another athlete from a few years ago (honestly don't remember if it was even a football player).  That it was basically one of those things where he should be fine for a while, there isn't a huge concern of immediate injury risk.   But what he has going on with his knee is something that is degenerative and there's little chance he'll be able to play more than 5 or so years on it before he won't be able to play anymore. So basically it was teams knowing if they draft him, he's probably going to be only a rookie contract player and even if he's great, you might not be able to get use out of him on a second contract.  Which in turn makes the drop make sense, but I'm kinda surprised some contending team didn't take him late in the 1st, hoping he'd put them over the top on a SB run but then not even have to worry about giving him a big contract in 4 years too.
    • Depends if they see the writing on the wall with their roster and contracts and decide to bite the bullet and begin a complete rebuild and roster overhaul.  I have no clue why some franchises (IE us) refuse to do this and keep half assing trying to win 8 games or so.  Do it correctly, take your lumps and build a contender.  We shall see what loomis decides.
    • Each team plays 17 games.  I do not see why they don't just have each team play one international game per year.  Neutral site game, 8 home, 8 away.    
×
×
  • Create New...