Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do We Double Dip Again?


mercules20

Recommended Posts

It all depends on who is available. We double dipped because Short, who we thought was a 1st rounder, was somehow there in the 2nd.

He drafts BPA and the Short pick was incredibe value.

Who knows if something like that will happen again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest shitposting

It's definitely possible we'll take two WRs or CBs in this draft. I don't think OT with be an option as so many have decided to stay in school this year. It's possibly we take two WRs in the first three rounds. I doubt we would take two CBs that high, but anything is possible on draft day when you use position weighted BPA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not double dipping at OT....

 

WR maybe but probably will rotate....

 

Don't be surprised to see WR or CB in the first depending on how many QBs actually go in the first....there are several pretty damn good CBs that could fall that would be tempting.(although I'm 100% for best WR available)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i don't think the plan was to double dip. it was just an opportunity that fell into his lap that he took advantage of.

 

i don't expect that to happen again...at least not any time soon.

 

i also wouldn't rule out the possibility. it's just not something to plan on him doing or expect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I won't be against double dipping at Oline and trying to get by with patchwork WR and RB, many hear may not remember but sometimes the thing that helps out a QB RB WR more then more talent at those positions is better oline, because it equals more push, more protection bigger running lanes, ect. just helps a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I truly think we *had* to hire a Canales. Nobody except a nobody wanted this job after the way things unfolded since Tepper took over.  I'd have offered Vrabel a blank check and said congrats, you'll stay the highest paid coach in NFL every year. But I still don't think he would've taken it with the stank we had/have on this franchise. 
    • This is something I definitely relate to. I have been saying we have been indoctrinated since year one. Hypnotized. Something. Not sure how to verbalize it. We got used to seeing it. Desensitized lol.  It looks normal now, but the first year and the first couple of games the difference between him and normal NFL QB play that I had been used to watching my entire long life was stark. And as a fan of the team, seeing it was fuging disturbing.  I remember after the first game in September 2023 just being kind of in shock over what I had seen on my TV screen.  And the 3rd game vs Seattle when Dalton played, it looked right again. Major difference. No wonder Frank had ‘that look’.  I noticed that by year two it didn’t seem that way nearly so much. But then I’d watch some other teams play and it was real noticeable.   And I don’t think we really see the arc or trajectory, or the velocity all that well on a telecast with those angles compared to being in the stands. Someone else might opine on that, I have not been in the stands.  I said all along I could see a way it could work, but really didn’t want to watch that kind of ball. And we have kind of done that. Made it work enough to get a playoff game. Here we are. 
    • Jamarcus Russell, Ponder, Locker, Fielder. Many examples.
×
×
  • Create New...