Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We had our chance to sign Hardy, lets not make the same mistakes we made with D. Lo and J. Stew, he has to walk :(


thunderraiden

Recommended Posts

I hate it more than anyone else but since when has paying a player after a contract year big money ever worked out for us? When have we not paid a player big money and it work our for us? Imagine if we were still paying Peppers 50% of our cap space? What if we had Mushin Mohammad taking up a crazy amount of the cap the year Steve took us to the NFC Championship game on his back? What if we had a stud WR right now and a 3rd year running back making peanuts instead of DeAngelo Williams? What about Brent Grimes at CB and another 2nd year RB making even less peanuts at RB2?

My point is, last year was our chance to sign G. Hardy to a managable contract, now we would overpay for him just like the Ravens and we would gimp our secondary, offensive line, and WR position to do it. Instead, lets just bite the bullet and let him walk and fill in the gaps with rookies. I love GQ but before the season was our chance, we missed it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate it more than anyone else but since when has paying a player after a contract year big money ever worked out for us? When have we not paid a player big money and it work our for us? Imagine if we were still paying Peppers 50% of our cap space? What if we had Mushin Mohammad taking up a crazy amount of the cap the year Steve took us to the NFC Championship game on his back? What if we had a stud WR right now and a 3rd year running back making peanuts instead of DeAngelo Williams? What about Brent Grimes at CB and another 2nd year RB making even less peanuts at RB2?

My point is, last year was our chance to sign G. Hardy to a managable contract, now we would overpay for him just like the Ravens and we would gimp our secondary, offensive line, and WR position to do it. Instead, lets just bite the bullet and let him walk and fill in the gaps with rookies. I love GQ but before the season was our chance, we missed it.

I'd rather work to come to an agreement that would benefit both parties (discount for a shot at a ring, tag & trade, etc.. ) than throw up my hands & quit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hardy is a solid player, but not elite.  He whips the weak sisters and disappears when the T is good.  He was rarely doubled this year, since Star and Luke and CJ commanded attention.  Here is a stat that tells me a lot:

 

Hardy was average to below average through 2011.  However, in 2012 and 2013, he gets 26 sacks (combined)

In 2012, He had 11 sacks, but 6.5 were against 3 teams with terrible problems at OT---San Diego, Chicago, and Washington.

In 2013, he had 10 sacks vs. teams with problems at T--in just 4 games--New Orleans (second game vs rookie), New York Giants (a few fans logged sacks that game), and Atlanta (twice).  Miami had a trainwreck at T and he disappeared.  Staley shut him down, and Kalil in Minnesota shut him down. 

Basically, in the 32 games that Hardy played to get 26 sacks, If you take away 7 games vs. weak OTs (backups, rookies, etc), he gets 9.5 sacks in 25 games.  He can thank CJ, Luke, and Star for the contract he is about to get.

 

This year, he had 0 sacks in games we lost.

 

He is a solid player, but he will not go elsewhere and get 15 sacks.  He is not elite, and he wants to be paid as he is elite.

Love him as a player, but not at double digits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's just the way the league works, if you want to keep your guys you have to pay them. We've gotten work out of CJ, Smitty, Olsen, Gross, Kalil, etc.

I love Greg an I think he is a cornerstone of our D, but we just don't have the flexibility to take an "at all costs" approach, unfortunately. I want him back, but with the rest of he front 7 I have confidence in whomever we play at his spot if he walks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's just the way the league works, if you want to keep your guys you have to pay them. We've gotten work out of CJ, Smitty, Olsen, Gross, Kalil, etc.

I love Greg an I think he is a cornerstone of our D, but we just don't have the flexibility to take an "at all costs" approach, unfortunately. I want him back, but with the rest of he front 7 I have confidence in whomever we play at his spot if he walks.

 

We are going to miss him in the run game, but to pay him as an elite pass rusher is something we can't afford. 

 

I go back to the CJ contract, when he was a 1-hit wonder, when Atlanta was the only real threat to us and they were in a cap situation.  He (in my opinion-others disagree) was overpaid by $20m over the life of the contract.  That made it so we could not have 2 DEs on second contracts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I trust Gettleman is going to make the smart moves from a business and football standpoint.  He's got this.  

 

We'll at least talk to him to see where things are looking to be $$ wise.  Everything is a balancing act and Hurney sucks.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saints trade WR Shaheed to Seahawks Seahawks get: WR Rashid Shaheed Saints get: 2026 fourth-round pick, 2026 fifth-round pick Seahawks' grade: A- Saints' grade: B+ One of the NFL's hottest passing teams just got better. The Seahawks currently rank third in EPA per dropback (0.25) and first in success rate on dropbacks (53%). And now they are adding Shaheed in a move that makes sense both on the field and in terms of where the Seahawks are as a franchise. Shaheed, 27, is averaging 1.8 yards per route run this season. But I think that sells him short because that number is down a bit from his career average entering this year (2.0) and he's been playing a role that includes running fewer vertical routes (34%) compared to last year (44%). Shaheed also has consistently posted above-average open scores in ESPN's receiver score metrics, including a 63 this season that ranks 28th among wide receivers. As a complement to Jaxon Smith-Njigba, I expect Shaheed will run downfield more often and be a bigger threat in that role than rookie Tory Horton was. When Cooper Kupp returns, he and Shaheed will make for a nice pair of secondary threats behind one of the best receivers in the league in Smith-Njigba. This is the time to strike for the Seahawks. FPI gives Seattle an 84% chance to make the playoffs and a 5% shot at winning the Super Bowl. This addition helps boost their chances without mortgaging their future the way the Colts did in the Sauce Gardner trade. Shaheed is a pending free agent but given the leverage of the moment for the Seahawks and their need I think they ought to be plenty willing to pay the cost. Shaheed is young enough to where if Seattle doesn't retain him he should sign a free agent contract that would yield Seattle a compensatory pick -- if the Seahawks don't nullify that pick with signings of their own. Because the Seahawks currently have $79 million in cap space next year, per OverTheCap, getting that compensatory pick is not guaranteed. The Saints are not rolling in cap space the way the Seahawks are -- and thus would land a compensatory pick for Shaheed -- but they got more draft capital this way than they otherwise would have. Considering New Orleans' 1-8 record, this should have been an easy decision.
    • I thought victory Mondays was pretty standard 
×
×
  • Create New...