Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Greg Hardy Has a Collection of 25-30 Firearms


dgr81

Recommended Posts

Regarding the right to search a house.

 

 

The law permits officers to make warrantless searches and seizures if they find that exigent circumstances exist and that they have probable cause. An exigent circumstance exists when an officer has a compelling need to take official action but lacks the time needed to acquire a warrant. Determining probable cause in this context requires a consideration of the totality of the circumstances to determine whether an officer acted in accord with a high probability that the search would turn up contraband or evidence. The decision maker must examine the facts making up the totality of the circumstances from the viewpoint of an objectively reasonable officer prior to making the arrest.

 

I guess the question would be does her being bruised and saying "he threw me down on a couch filled with guns" constitute exigent circumstances?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's not the only one with a gun collection.  Plenty of people collect guns. I'm a super liberal....but I love my guns. I spent more on guns than I spent to get a car and go to the range at least once a month.  Normal people own guns too.  The fact that he owns multiple fire arms shouldn't really be an issue.  The woman said he threatened her with the guns, but  I don't think that a statement like that can even be proven true in a court of law.  He is well within his rights as an American to own as many guns as he wants until such time as he commits a crime that bars him from owning weapons or is proven to be mentally unstable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You just agreed that they can search if they feel circumstances require it.  So yes you are arguing semantics or maybe you just don't understand that.

 

Probable cause is really just a umbrella term for a search or detainment. You could have probable cause and still need a warrant, or you could have probable cause and not need one depending on the situation. I guess you needed this broken down for you since you think I'm so "wrong".

 

If I tell you how right you are will you go away?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What would we do with that cap space at this point in the season?

 

 

The options are out there....the question would be what's feasible. Trade another team for an O-lineman? A cornerback? Who knows.

 

The only thing that's for sure is this is something he'll never be able to walk away from. It'll follow him through his career.  Richardson isn't too big on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding the right to search a house.

 

 

I guess the question would be does her being bruised and saying "he threw me down on a couch filled with guns" constitute exigent circumstances?

Probably not. The whole idea is that the cops need to suspect something is happening right now that voids the need for a warrant. The suspect is destroying evidence, beating the crap out of someone, shooting a gun, snorting coke in plain view.

 

The guns themselves are even a crime unless he has something that should be registered and isn't. And in that case the cops would need to get a warrant anyway

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Owning lots of guns doesn't mean anything....

I'd bet there are many guys with absurd collections in Carolina. I know some think I dislike the man but it is really the contract/situation....

But one is the nicest players in Carolina is DWill....he is a hunting redneck. I bet he has a sweet collection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I crazy or has nobody even had a negative comment about him owning guns? Yet people feel the need to have to defend it.

 

Almost like you have guilty consciences because you know it tends to make you a bad person.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It wasn’t completely his fault, but outside of two throws and one or two scrambles he didn’t do much to help. His accuracy was all over the place, numerous passes that were placed poorly and didn’t give the receiver a good chance to catch the ball or do anything with it after. He also continues to display terrible pocket awareness. Even the sacks could have been avoided, they weren’t immediate like the pressure we got on Shough at times. Bryce just often has no feel for pressure and stands there waiting to get sacked after numerous seconds have passed. 
    • I really fuging hate this era in so many ways.  I look at those Adin Ross and Neon kids, and I just wonder why tf are they famous?  Why would anyone be desperate enough to gain THAT audience that they’d risk money, career, disciplinary action to go up there and associate with those fuging dweebs?  And back in my day, racist peers got their ass beat.  And not endorsing or approving bully culture, but checks and balances and all…  had those two been bullied, or at the very least humbled, they wouldn’t be famous and glorified for being the fuging idiots they are now.  It seriously pisses me off… they both have done and said multiple, openly racist stuff and major media keeps pushing them, talking about them, and propping them up… and then dummies like Puka who don’t need the platform or exposure lend their celebrity to them.  fuging idiot… and even the other streamers, I don’t get - Speed, Kai…  I don’t understand making nobodies famous at all, but there is at least entertainment value to some degree there, and I could see how young, impressionable kids would find them something to aspire to (sadly), or view as “cool.”  But Ross and Neon?  They’re just shitty, shitty nerds with big ass mouths. I’ve went back recently and watched some classics (in two very different eras and categories 😂)  like Robocop and Idiocracy.  And what I find fascinating is how both movies illustrate how stupid society became by showing what the citizenry is entertained by.  In both, society became anti-intellectual and the citizenry were entertained by lowest denominator, primal-type absurdity - poo like, “Ouch! My Balls!”  Or on Robocop, a guy is a watching a show where they are smashing cakes on ladies’ breasts and then a guy says a line as the camera zooms in like, “I’d buy that for a dollar!” and the audience thinks it’s hilarious.  That’s where I feel like we are now.  Like who watches that clip with Puka and thinks any of that poo is funny or cool?  If I was Puka, I’d honestly be wondering why tf I’m hanging out with these beta ass, racist, cretin ass weirdos.
    • 7 wins this year and some of those against really good teams and yall think Canales might get fired? Lol Good luck getting a better coach in here if that happens.  
×
×
  • Create New...