Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Isportsweb: Raiders need to trade Moore


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Guess who was mentioned as the example for a trade partner? Easy answer, huh? Well just because an answer is easy doesn't mean it's wrong. Like Joe Horning suggested, it makes "perfect" sense.

 

Given his production and speed, he would make a nice trade target for a receiver needy team. Someone like the Carolina Panthers, who have nothing but a raw rookie, aging slot receivers, and untested practice squad to throw to, Moore is a perfect option.

 

http://isportsweb.com/2014/06/25/oakland-raiders-reggie-mckenzie-needs-trade-denarius-moore/

A 6th could be a pittance to pay for this Guy. I would love to get him before the Browns or the Falcons. Proehl would probably help Denarius Moore play with consistency and unleash his potential.

It just makes too much sense I guess.


BTW, creating a thread with a phone for the first time is...interesting.

Sent from my SGH-T989 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We'd only have him for this year, and frankly it wouldn't be worth it to pay his salary. He's not a missing piece to the puzzle, and it's very possible he wouldn't even be a starter for us. Moore is an okay receiver but he dropped the ball as much or more than LaFell, which everyone here hated. Not worth a draft pick, even a 7th in my opinion. He had opportunities to put up huge stats in garbage time because Oakland was down so much in so many games, yet he couldn't even do that...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We'd only have him for this year, and frankly it wouldn't be worth it to pay his salary. He's not a missing piece to the puzzle, and it's very possible he wouldn't even be a starter for us. Moore is an okay receiver but he dropped the ball as much or more than LaFell, which everyone here hated. Not worth a draft pick, even a 7th in my opinion. He had opportunities to put up huge stats in garbage time because Oakland was down so much in so many games, yet he couldn't even do that...

You have a point, but Moore had at least two coaches, OCs, and probably at least four or five fair to crappy QBs since he has been in the league. Yes, he has had problems with consistency and focus at times, but unlike LaFell, Moore has shown legitimate flashes and play making ability. Moreover, we do need a speed receiver because Underwood is apparently underwhelming so far and has never really been a play maker.

I bet if Moore hits the market, some team is going to jump at the chance to get him, especially with Moore having great potential at a bargain price.

Sent from my SGH-T989 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't our last trade with them result in a certain sixth round draft pick in 2010 that we used to get a sea monster?

No, it resulted in the shipping off of an unfocused RB (Goodson) for a hulking LT (Campbell) who never saw the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guess who was mentioned as the example for a trade partner? Easy answer, huh? Well just because an answer is easy doesn't mean it's wrong. Like Joe Horning suggested, it makes "perfect" sense.

"Given his production and speed, he would make a nice trade target for a receiver needy team. Someone like the Carolina Panthers, who have nothing but a raw rookie, aging slot receivers, and untested practice squad to throw to, Moore is a perfect option."

http://isportsweb.com/2014/06/25/oakland-raiders-one-last-offseason-move/

A 6th could be a pittance to pay for this Guy. I would love to get him before the Browns or the Falcons. Proehl would probably help Moore play with consistency and unleash his potential.

It just makes too much sense I guess.

BTW, creating a thread with a phone for the first time is...interesting.

Sent from my SGH-T989 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Let it be known that MHS gave you your 2000th pie.  (I read your profile info--hats off, sir).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
×
×
  • Create New...