Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

That Roman Harper injury timeout....

Jeremy Igo

By Jeremy Igo,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

Freefua is right... This kind of poo is way way worse than being late for a meeting... This directly impacted the ACTUAL GAME.

 

 

 

I'm starting to really wonder about RR. When he got his extension I briefly wondered if it was too early but I supported him and thought he'd be ok. This kind of stuff, man I gotta wonder about him. He came in as the kick ass disciplinarian, but now seems to either be a wimp or he has his guys that he looks out for. Sad, and fuging sucks for us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
-13 Amp- Newbie

-13 Amp-

Posted
Posted

If I recall Seattle also had a player down not long after that inside of two minutes as well. Unless I missed it, I don't remember them getting charged a time out.

 

 

There was zero consistency with that call yesterday.

 

1) On the TD, the clock stops. The next play was an un-timed down. We lose a TO for an injury (Harper), which makes zero sense since it wouldn't affect the flow of the game or the game clock.

 

2) On the ensuing kickoff a Seahawks player gets hurts. Again, the clock stops automatically. However, this time the Seahawks do NOT lose a TO for injury. To me this is the correct interpretation since this injury has little to no bearing on the game clock or the flow of the game.

 

Now none of this mattered for this game, but is easily could have mattered.

 

 

Exactly. I was with others, thinking it was only if the clock was running. Then, Seattle player stays down due to injury and no T.O. taken. So, I guess it's only a blanket rule for a team that is losing?

it was said on page one with the Mike Pereira tweet...

 

@MikePereira: For those asking about panthers charged TO, it was within two minutes.

Always applies - unless there's a change of possession.

there was a change of possession, so the rule no longer applies...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AceBoogie Veteran

AceBoogie

Posted
Posted

The defense didn't lose this game.

They really did, have to be able to finish games. Our offense couldn't score all game, but neither could theirs. They allowed the only touchdown of the game, and allowed Seattle to burn the clock while doing it. Ron Rivera is a coach that relies on his defense to win the game and they had the opportunity, just needed one more stop and couldn't get it. Ron Rivera's defensive mindset is a major reason why we go so conservative in the redzone. He's perfectly happy winning a game 2-0. Defense has to get off the field at the end of games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kuhndog94 Grand Master

Kuhndog94

Posted
Posted

They really did, have to be able to finish games. Our offense couldn't score all game, but neither could theirs. They allowed the only touchdown of the game, and allowed Seattle to burn the clock while doing it. Ron Rivera is a coach that relies on his defense to win the game and they had the opportunity, just needed one more stop and couldn't get it. Ron Rivera's defensive mindset is a major reason why we go so conservative in the redzone. He's perfectly happy winning a game 2-0. Defense has to get off the field at the end of games.

Uh.... The defense preformed great.

In NO way was it their fault.

Its all on our offense for not getting into the end zone.

Offense includes Shula.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mojo Newbie

Mojo

Posted
Posted

D played great.  Just because our coach is defensive minded that doesn't absolve the offense from scoring points.

 

The offense has only put up two touchdowns in the past two weeks, and that was in garbage time.

 

Don't put this on the defense.  Holding a team to 13 should be good enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • trucpfan
      Time to Sign David Njoku

      By trucpfan · Posted

      You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Cpt slay a ho
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By Cpt slay a ho · Posted

      Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • Thorrez
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By Thorrez · Posted

      This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...