Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Say it ain't so.... Joe...


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Generalizing in either direction can be a bad approach for the whole small school mantra that some here have developed. 

 

If a GM sees translatable talent, get it.  For DG, he seems to have an eye for talent so I'd trust him if he grabbed one early.  Yeah, it seems to be a pattern with OLs as of late to not do that well but it doesn't mean lets say a Sambrailo or Poole would be a bad pick.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at Brad Hoover. Just a walk in from WCU and he played lights out. I'm for scouting them all.

Most small school players don't have Catamount heart though. Just look at how Armanti plagued us. Cutting him was the turning point in the 2013 season.

Basically we need more Brad Hoover's and less Amanti Edwards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You got to checkout everyone, sure its more likely to find legit pros in big schools. UDFAs is where you show your worth form the smaller schools. I do think a big reason teams gamble on these D2 schools is ego driven.

Plus there's always reports after the panthers got edwards, kugzilla, and amini. __________ teams had a high rank on that player and are super jelly that the panthers 1 up'd them. SF had reports that thery almost picked amini in 1st. Other teams where upset, once the panther took edwards.... according to darrin " super app fanboy" grantt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most small school players don't have Catamount heart though. Just look at how Armanti plagued us. Cutting him was the turning point in the 2013 season.

Basically we need more Brad Hoover's and less Amanti Edwards.

 

this is next level butthurt

 

maybe now that the traditional powers are gone from the southern conference the sad sack little catamount fans can have something to cheer for that isn't rooted in "buh buh brad hoover"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, this is where I think the change in scouting services is going to be important.

BLESTO concentrates on game performance rather than measurables. You could figure they would factor level of competition into that formula.

Few people ever seem to talk about that change, but it was made before last year's draft and we had arguably our best rookie class ever.

I actually believe that might have been a more important move than any of us realized at the time.

best point in the thread right here. 

 

Worst? freaking out because the team was mentioned in regards to a prospect - total rookie move.  One, that stuff comes from agents, so consider that.  Two, speaking to a guy, scouting a guy, even working out a guy, doesn't mean "we're clearly making this guy the cornerstone of our draft.  They talk to everybody.  That's what scouts do. 

 

Dave Gettleman said BPA.  I don't know how clearer that needs to be.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...