Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So how do we restructure/extend Charles Johnson?


thunderraiden

Recommended Posts

You'd also have to consider the fact you'd be paying Hardy upwards of 30 mil for potentially only 7 games.

30 mill for one season? Id pay 15 at most for Hardy next year anything more than that then I'd let him go

But like what you and squirrel are saying, chances are CJ won't be touched and that kind of sucks because 20 million is a fug ton for CJ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of the blatant offseason moves have been made, all that is left is the restructuring/extensions of Thomas Davis, Greg Olsen, and Ryan Kalil, they will all happen but they are trivial affairs, they will most likely be cut and dry with Gettleman creating a fair deal for both parties. However, things are a lot more complicated on the Charles Johnson contract.

 

With Charles he has 2 years left with 20 million this year and 15 million next year totaling 35 million. Now, I would love to have that spread over 4 years and it would also still be fair for both parties, but it ain't gonna happen in our wildest dreams, therefor, what realistically is possible with Charles Johnson's contract? I understand we all want to see a contract reconstruction but with only 2 years left and 35 million on hand, how does the process shake out? Here is a salary cap calculator to help out: http://overthecap.com/calculator/carolina-panthers

 

First of all that calculator that you linked is a great tool for trying to figure out what options DG has with certain players.

 

With only two years left on his contract a simple restructure won't provide a huge amount of relief.  You are basically just switching the two years around.

 

Cap hit as is:  2015 - $20,020,000                                                  Basic restructure: 2015 - $15,580,000

                       2016 - $15,020,000                                                                               2016 - $19,460,000

 

By a "basic restructure" I'm referring to converting the majority of his 2015 salary into a signing bonus and spreading it out over the life of the contract.   As you can see, either way he is going to consume roughly $35,000,000 in cap space over the next two years, which would average close to $17,500,000 a year.

 

In order to get this number down anymore CJ would have to take a pay cut or we would have to add years to his contract.  To determine if this is feasible for either party we would have to look at some of the variables involved.

 

CJ's total cap hit for the next two years:  $35,000,000 <the number the team cares about

CJ's total salary for the next two years:  $21,000,000 <the number CJ should care about

CJ's Dead Money left: $14,000,000 <no matter what we do we will be responsible for this amount over the next few years

 

Pay cut:

For all practical purposes CJ has a $21m/2yr contract left with none of it guaranteed.  You have to remember all of his previous guaranteed money has already been paid to him so it really doesn't add anything to what he will earn over the next few years.

Would CJ be willing to take less over the next few years, say $16m for 2 years? I doubt it, I would think he could get close to $10m a year on the open market.

 

Extension:

For him to sign an extension he would have to feel like it was beneficial to him.  As I stated above his current salary is $21m for 2 years.  Would he consider $36m for 4 years if we guaranteed a decent amount of it?  I have no idea.

 

$36m for 4 years would be $9m per year but we would also have to account for his $14m in dead money.

$36m + $14m = $50m

$50m/4yrs = $12.5m per year cap hit

 

In reality the yearly cap hit probably wouldn't be the same each year.  Depending on the structure of the contract it could start out lower and go up.  Since bonuses can only be spread out over 5 years there is a limit on how much we could spread out some of his old dead money.  I really don't see a way we can get his 2015 cap hit much below $10m.

 

While an extension could possible lower his yearly cap cost there are drawbacks.  With any extension there will probably be some guaranteed money associated with it and therefore his dead cap would increase.  This makes it harder for the team to move on from the player if his production starts to decline as he ages.

 

For any extension the coaches and GM have to decide how productive the player can be in the future and for how long.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hurney still haunts us. those are obscene figures.

 

i don't see CJ being let go, especially with the other side of the line in question and the dependence we have on a great front seven. twenty-eight is young for a defensive end with his playing style, and realistically he has another seven years left in the tank. if he wants to play his career at carolina, i say give the man a three-year extension, front-loaded, but restructure some of that up-front money to a signing bonus and set ourselves up to be able to cut him a few years down the road with minimal impact if his production takes a dive.

 

very doable IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First of all that calculator that you linked is a great tool for trying to figure out what options DG has with certain players.

With only two years left on his contract a simple restructure won't provide a huge amount of relief. You are basically just switching the two years around.

Cap hit as is: 2015 - $20,020,000 Basic restructure: 2015 - $15,580,000

2016 - $15,020,000 2016 - $19,460,000

By a "basic restructure" I'm referring to converting the majority of his 2015 salary into a signing bonus and spreading it out over the life of the contract. As you can see, either way he is going to consume roughly $35,000,000 in cap space over the next two years, which would average close to $17,500,000 a year.

In order to get this number down anymore CJ would have to take a pay cut or we would have to add years to his contract. To determine if this is feasible for either party we would have to look at some of the variables involved.

CJ's total cap hit for the next two years: $35,000,000 <the number the team cares about

CJ's total salary for the next two years: $21,000,000 <the number CJ should care about

CJ's Dead Money left: $14,000,000 <no matter what we do we will be responsible for this amount over the next few years

Pay cut:

For all practical purposes CJ has a $21m/2yr contract left with none of it guaranteed. You have to remember all of his previous guaranteed money has already been paid to him so it really doesn't add anything to what he will earn over the next few years.

Would CJ be willing to take less over the next few years, say $16m for 2 years? I doubt it, I would think he could get close to $10m a year on the open market.

Extension:

For him to sign an extension he would have to feel like it was beneficial to him. As I stated above his current salary is $21m for 2 years. Would he consider $36m for 4 years if we guaranteed a decent amount of it? I have no idea.

$36m for 4 years would be $9m per year but we would also have to account for his $14m in dead money.

$36m + $14m = $50m

$50m/4yrs = $12.5m per year cap hit

In reality the yearly cap hit probably wouldn't be the same each year. Depending on the structure of the contract it could start out lower and go up. Since bonuses can only be spread out over 5 years there is a limit on how much we could spread out some of his old dead money. I really don't see a way we can get his 2015 cap hit much below $10m.

While an extension could possible lower his yearly cap cost there are drawbacks. With any extension there will probably be some guaranteed money associated with it and therefore his dead cap would increase. This makes it harder for the team to move on from the player if his production starts to decline as he ages.

For any extension the coaches and GM have to decide how productive the player can be in the future and for how long.

Having done some of the same calculations as you did without doing so in detail (good job), I agree that a restructure makes no sense. You either move on after 2015 or you extend him for at least. 2 more years which only makes him 32 going on 33 when the extension would end. Given he has been pretty durable and consistent, I wouldn't worry about him declining too much. Plus with the franchise tag for a DE being right at 15 million for 2015, getting him for under that would be a win win for both sides.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know cj is our best DE under contract currently, but he did have a down year and 20 million dollars is something I'd expect JJ Watt to make in a season.

Here is a hypothetical question if we designate CJ as a june 1st cut and then use that money to go after Hardy would anyone be opposed to that? I know this is extremely unlikely to happen but IMO it puts us in better shape for the long term as long as Hardy can keep his nose clean. Keep in mind you also have to take into account Hardys possible suspension next year as well.

not happening guys, I mean they went to his grandma's funeral
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not see Gettleman keeping Charles Johnson. Would not be the least bit surprised if you see Charles Johnson and Greg Hardy playing together again with the Atlanta Falcons.

Gettleman LOVES defensive lineman. Outside of Charles Johnson right now we have a bunch of jags. Chuck J isn't going anywhere. He will be extended to a mutually beneficial deal and there will be much rejoicing.

Like when they ate Sir Robin's Minstrels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know cj is our best DE under contract currently, but he did have a down year and 20 million dollars is something I'd expect JJ Watt to make in a season.

Here is a hypothetical question if we designate CJ as a june 1st cut and then use that money to go after Hardy would anyone be opposed to that? I know this is extremely unlikely to happen but IMO it puts us in better shape for the long term as long as Hardy can keep his nose clean. Keep in mind you also have to take into account Hardys possible suspension next year as well.

He was leg-whipped after an excellent opening in 2013 and didn't fully recover until about midway through this season. PFF rated him as the best DE over the final stretch of this season. There is absolutely no way he is cut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was leg-whipped after an excellent opening in 2013 and didn't fully recover until about midway through this season. PFF rated him as the best DE over the final stretch of this season. There is absolutely no way he is cut.

And the apparently-not-so-common-common-sense-award goes to...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I interpreted your original reply as the team could have success if the new players and coaches were really good, AND they created an offense that didn't count on the QB being a primary contributor. Because you think Bryce won't be able to hold up his end. I think you confirm that above. My only point is that I don't see how anyone can say definitively what Bryce Young will be in the league yet, based on his supporting cast from last season. And it seems those that have already decided that Bryce Young is a bust, likely just didn't like him as the pick in the first place. A little context for me... lots of folk here didn't like Cam while he was a Panther either. It had very little to do with him as a talent. And just for the record, I really am not invested in Bryce Young. I didn't want the team to move up for a QB at all in 2023. I thought 2024 would be the year to go for a QB. But when they did, I ordered the QBs as Anthony Richardson, then CJ, then Bryce. The disfunction from the front office, to the playcalling, to the scheme, to the oline and the receivers was just not a good situation. Horrible actually. Asking a rookie to perform with all that adversity is just not realistic to me, at any position let alone QB. So to me, the verdict is still out. I don't know if he can be the guy because the situation he was in last year was set up to fail from the start. In preseason, as soon as I saw the oline couldn't figure out how to even slow down the Jets' pass rush (particularly stunts) and the receivers were locked up like Fort Knox, I knew we were in for a long season. 
    • I bet one would. But I hear you and hope he can control himself.
    • It's a different vibe for sure. He sounds like he knows what he's talking about and his general plan---that which he tells the world---sounds like a working plan. Reich didn't seem to have a plan, and Rhule's plan was ill-suited for grown men. Reich coached like a zombie---just dead and uninspiring. Rhule thought that he could take his college guys and dominate in the pros, smiled in guys faces and threw them under the bus. His brand of motivation has plays running to a DBO sign. Canales seems to be schooled in motivation, but also believes the stuff he is selling down to his core. We'll see if it holds up.    
×
×
  • Create New...