Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

David Newton: Panthers will NOT add Gurley or Gordon (unless they fall to the second)!


top dawg

Recommended Posts

This is the first time that I've seen David Newton talk in an absolute, so to speak, when speaking of the Panthers draft plans. He says they "won't" use that first pick on a running back. 

 

The Panthers still might use a draft pick on a back. They just won’t use it in the first round for Georgia’s Todd Gurley or Wisconsin’s Melvin Gordon -- unless one of the top-rated backs falls into the second or even third round. 

 

 

He mentions some possible mid-tier free agents in Ryan Mathews, C.J. Spiller or mark Ingram, but concedes that even this is not likely because we have bigger needs at other positions.  His core premise though is that our current stable of RBs is enough to handle the load, even without Deangelo Williams.

 

Newton did say (without the absolute, mind you) that the Panthers would in "all likelihood" fill D-Will's void with a mid-rounder.  As deep as this draft is with arguably talented RBs with projected mid-round grades, the Panthers really can't help but upgrade the position.  

 

I doubt Ameer Abdullah will be available, but Duke Johnson or Jay Ajayi, "Come on down!"  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've watched virtually nothing of Gordon but Gurley is incredible. If he's there on board in the 2nd, then even I in all my disdain for high round RBs would be hard pressed to pass him up.

That said, it's only an outside shot he's there and this draft is deep with talented players at the position. You're going to see a plethora of NFL starters come off the board in the later rounds (rather than Kenjon Barners), and I figure we probably get one there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People take BPA way too literally. Position absolutely figures into the BPA equation.

Yep. BPA is team specific. Need, preference, scheme, roster....all influence it.

Claiming BPA is really just coach talk and way to not talk about it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...