Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CBS Sports 7 Round Mock Draft


Recommended Posts

Not Bad would take it.  Not overly thrilled about a QB in round 4 but I would take this draft.

 

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/25149011/seven-round-2015-nfl-mock-draft-dgb-gurley-goldman-fall-out-of-first

 

25.  T.J. Clemmings, OT, Pittsburgh

57.  Nelson Agholor, WR, Southern Cal

89.  Duke Johnson, RB, Miami

124.Garrett Grayson, QB, Colorado State

161. Senquez Golson, CB, Ole Miss
169. Gerod Holliman, S, Louisville
174. Corey Robinson, OT, Auburn

201. Andy Gallik, C, Boston College

242. Troy Hill, CB, Oregon

 

This would really address all our needs on top of the free agents we signed

 

Here is an article about Gerod Holliman being compared to a young Ed Reed

 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000426238/article/scouts-take-louisvilles-gerod-holliman-like-a-young-ed-reed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not bad. Disagree with a few things such as Gettleman taking two very undersized CB's when he has shown a clear preference for size, a QB and I like other OTs much more than Clemmings but I'd be totally satisfied if that's what we ended up with in the draft.

I can't really expect someone to know the desired positional traits of every team in the league and doing a full 7 round draft is a damn chore so the writer gets a pass from me on the CB's and Clemmings is a matter of preference. Teams with franchise QBs regularly take them in the mid rounds in the draft so it wouldn't be crazy if we did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Besides the QB it looks like a good draft to me.

 

Everybody thinks Clemmings has a very high ceiling at LT. 

I really want Agholor and if we don't get Gurley (...or Gordon) then I want Duke Johnson. 

Senquez Golson & Gerod Holliman are ballhawks in the secondary. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is absolutely no need to draft a quarterback this year. Bpa be damned I will be pissed if we take a QB in any round.

We passed on Connor Shaw last year and he would have been a perfect fit. No need for a QB anymore...

 

IF we draft a qb, it could speak volumes about the Cam negotiations.  But we could draft a qb, trade Anderson....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Drafting a QB isn't necessarily a bad idea. I love having Anderson as a back up but he does cost money. Plus, Cam is nearing the point where he should be able to run the show without the need of a veteran like Derek helping him. 

 

 

I love Cam and want him to be one of the all time greats for us, but I don't think drafting a late round nudge would be a bad thing for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Besides the QB it looks like a good draft to me.

Everybody thinks Clemmings has a very high ceiling at LT.

I really want Agholor and if we don't get Gurley (...or Gordon) then I want Duke Johnson.

Senquez Golson & Gerod Holliman are ballhawks in the secondary.

A lot are people are saying Clemmings could be in the mold of Tyron Smith. If he could be even close to that I wouldn't mind the pick at all. But Gerod Holliman is definitely a ballhawk in the secondary.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...