Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I don't feel Bene gets enough respect from the Panther faithful


Matthias

Recommended Posts

I keep hearing how many of us want Bene to go back to being our nickel corner.  I've listened to some Charlotte sports talk, and they figure Charles Tillman will start opposite Norman, pretty much removing Bene without much thought whatsoever. (Not that I'm saying Tillman would be bad by any means.  I'm quite confident in his ability.  In fact, he is better than Bene right now.)

 

 

I think it would be a mistake to put Bene back at the nickel.  This guy is brimming on top corner ability.  It is very rare to have a guy like this at such a young age in NFL standards.  I want him to continue to progress in that.  To me, moving him back to being a part time nickel seems like we would put a lid on him.  Not that I believe his talent would regress or anything, but I just don't want to move him from that spot.  What I saw from him in his starts last year was downright incredible.  He legitimized our young secondary when Cason and White left it a gaping hole earlier in the season.  He has the skills of a true shut down corner, and I want him to continue to develop that in remaining our starter.  Now where would Tillman play if Bene is still the starter?  I've said before Tillman should take Harper's spot.  I wouldn't mind if Tillman took Boston's spot in the starting lineup because Tillman should definitely start.  Just not at the cost of Bene's spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't get ahead of yourself. Bene is not a true shut down corner. And it's no guarantee that he will be. The biggest reason for the secondary's success was Norman. Bene was a fantastic player across from him, but he was even better in the slot. He fits nickel perfectly and we're trying to have success on defense, not progress one player. And it's not like him playing nickel would hinder his progression. I anticipate we'll see Norman and Bene outside when we go with 3 backers and he'll kick inside in nickel packages with Tillman coming in. No reports have said he's strictly be nickel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't get ahead of yourself. Bene is not a true shut down corner. And it's no guarantee that he will be. The biggest reason for the secondary's success was Norman. Bene was a fantastic player across from him, but he was even better in the slot. He fits nickel perfectly and we're trying to have success on defense, not progress one player. And it's not like him playing nickel would hinder his progression. I anticipate we'll see Norman and Bene outside when we go with 3 backers and he'll kick inside in nickel packages with Tillman coming in. No reports have said he's strictly be nickel.

 

Late last year, people stopped throwing to Norman's side because they knew he was our best corner.  Yet we still did great against the pass because Bene showed up on the other side and took offenses best hit.  I think Tillman should start because I believe he's our best defensive back right now besides Norman.  So that means either Bene will be off the field if Tillman starts at corner, or we put Tillman at safety.  I rather see Tillman at safety and keep Bene on the outside.  At least that's my hope.  A lot of people want Bene back at nickel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bene moving back to nickel comes from Gettleman/Rivera and not from the fan base. People projecting Bene moving to nickel is almost solely based upon what the team wants to do. Everyone thought he did a great job on the outside at the end of last year and most don't see the need to move him back inside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bene moving back to nickel comes from Gettleman/Rivera and not from the fan base. People projecting Bene moving to nickel is almost solely based upon what the team wants to do. Everyone thought he did a great job on the outside at the end of last year and most don't see the need to move him back inside.

I'm one of those who don't see the need to move him inside.  People can talk about his 40 time all they want, but I've seen him run step-for-step, down the sidelines, with some fast receivers.  I like him on the outside, but it all boils down to where the coaches want him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ill just say nickel isn't a downgrade in our system but i would like bene on the outside as well. It's just about getting the best combo. If we don't have a legit nickel corner to take bene's place then yes move him back inside to cover the slot but only if we have someone who can man the outside at a quality level.

 

its about getting the right combination of DBs. slot recievers have burned us in the past and those quick throws have been used to negate our powerful pass rush in the past. Thats why bene is so valuable. Honestly this is a good problem to have. He's versatile

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he'll move to nickel for that package, but stay on the outside for base package.

 

There is precedent for this, and I think many of the "back to nickel" references actually mean this arrangement. That said, if Tillman moves to safety the trio of Bene-Norman-Jones was solid and Colin could be even better with additional experience at that position. The possibilities are very exciting because the team has some actual talent to work with... been a while since that could be said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's no disrespect to say Bene is a nickel CB, the guy was solid on the outside but he started out the year on fire at nickel creating turnovers. I have no clue if we intend to put Tillman at nickel, outside or at safety but I honestly think Bene can take this defense to a new level at nickel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bene's role in a game might boil down to who we are facing that particular week... He might be the nickel corner when we play teams with huge receivers, such as TB or CHI, or he may be the #2 if we play teams with smaller quicker receivers, like the Saints outside of Colston

I think this is key. If we have versatile talent, we should use versatile schemes. The best example I can think of is the Patriots. They seem to consistently change their scheme based on the weaknesses of their opponents. I'd like to see more of that versatility in Carolina.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
    • At least we don't need to hear overreacting about towels ...
    • Actually there is, try being a Charlotte Hornets fan. I mean the team fuging moved at its peak and hasn't recovered since and that was 25 years ago
×
×
  • Create New...