Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Running Back Class


jdpanther5

Recommended Posts

Stumbled across an article by Bob McGinn in which he documents a poll he took of 20 personnel men about this year's RB class. The top two are predictable, but it's kind of a crapshoot beyond that.

http://m.jsonline.com/sports/packers/todd-gurley-leads-ball-carriers-but-several-in-big-ten-among-top-10-b99486141z1-301335331.html

The whole article is worth a read, but here are the rankings:

1. Todd Gurley (93 points, 13 firsts)

2. Melvin Gordon (86 points, 7 firsts)

3. Ameer Abdullah (32)

4. T.J. Yeldon (31)

5. Tevin Coleman (21)

6. Duke Johnson (15)

7. Jay Ajayi (13)

8. Buck Allen (5)

9. David Johnson (2)

T10. David Cobb, Jeremy Langford (1)

Kinda surprised Abdullah is that high. I won't dispute him being maybe the third most talented back, but he's undersized and thus may not be an every-down guy. I don't see Yeldon over Coleman either, the latter of which is my third RB.

Ajayi would also be in the mix as the third back, but his injury seems to have scared teams off. Lots of other talented guys like Mike Davis, John Crockett, and Cameron Artis-Payne among others, didn't get a mention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for posting this.  Interesting. 

 

Big drop-off after #2. 

 

I really liked Davis at SC, so I would have no trouble going with him in the 4th round or so.  We have looked at a few of the later-round backs too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Won't surprise me one bit if either Tevin Coleman or Duke Johnson end up being the best RB out of the class.  Gurley is the most talented, but can he stay healthy.  Gordon is a near lock to be a bust IMO.  Abdullah has that fumblitis which sucks, because other than that I think he's very similar to Gio Bernard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for posting this. Interesting.

Big drop-off after #2.

I really liked Davis at SC, so I would have no trouble going with him in the 4th round or so. We have looked at a few of the later-round backs too.

I love Davis too but I could never figure him out in college. When he's healthy and trying, he's elite but some games he appeared to be taking it easy and not trying. If a team gets him late and he gives 100% effort in the pros, someone got a steal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something to consider is that If they're set with Fozzy being a change of pace/scat type, Stewart as the big component, and Todman as depth/KR, getting another bigger but all-around back would be ideal.  

 

Langford, Buck Allen, David Johnson, Taz Crockett, and Yeldon all kind of fit the mold I'm thinking would be the best fit outside of Gurley, Gordon, Ajaye, and Coleman.  Big but fast enough to bust open long runs.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love Davis too but I could never figure him out in college. When he's healthy and trying, he's elite but some games he appeared to be taking it easy and not trying. If a team gets him late and he gives 100% effort in the pros, someone got a steal.

 

Nobody had a closer seat to "Marcus Lattimer Story" than Davis.  He even referenced Lattimer when deciding to come out.  I wonder if possible injury was in his head.

 

I can't say it would not be in mine.  I have a chance for a deal of about $2m over 4 years at worst, and then lose it all vs. Central Florida?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, let me get this out there. Langford in the 4th. We still get to use our top 3 picks on WR, OL, and CB. Yet we still get a big back with enough speed to get to the house. He can pick up the blitz, and catches the ball very well. He has great vision, and has surprising wiggle to make folks miss. He also has a great spin move, which he can use in space, or in a crowd.

He isn't a scat back, but we have Fozzy for that. Langford is just what the doctor ordered. He can do everything we want our back-up RB to be able to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
    • Best part is if we draft him, we can also use him as our fourth and one QB sneaker
×
×
  • Create New...