Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Recommended Posts

So....Jeremy recently wrote an article about our rival, the New Orleans Saints, and basically suggested that the Saints will compete for the cellar of the NFC South this year. Meanwhile, two of four NFC South beat writers think the Saints will win the division. Granted, two of them also picked the Panthers to make the playoffs somehow. But this is indicative of the sports media. many many pundits seem to want to pick the Saints to challenge for the division title, despite an aging quarterback and significant free agency losses at multiple, integral positions (positions that were only really filled by rookie draftees). I will admit that i have thus far written off the Saints as cellar dwellers. But, amongst the cacaphony of dissenting voices, i am beginning to doubt that the Saints will be as bad as we Panther fans want them to be.

Here's the question... are we overlooking the Saints? did they really sink as far as we hope they did, or are we letting our electric blue glasses color our perception of our rival? I wont steal Jeremy's thunder by asking the same question he did. my perception of my fellow fans is that we may have overlooked our rival. 

what are your thoughts Huddle? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fans, sports media....we can overlook the Aints as much as we like. As long as the team takes them seriously and comes prepared to play lights-out football both home and away...that's all that really matters.

But yeah fug the Aints. I hope they go 0-16

 

 

i was just curious what the media obsession with them is about... thats all. but yea im with you. fug the Aints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You would be silly to overlook any team in our division. I'm not.

Regardless of how shitty the division was last year, these teams generally play each other hard.

Even as badly as we beat the Saints, and Falcons in December, we still split with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Saints are not going to be a bad team.  They won't be great either, but anyone hoping for an easy win from them will be disappointed.  There are two reasons that most pundits think they will win the division...Sean Payton and Drew Brees.  In no other measure does anyone think they are elite, but most believe the rest of the team is good enough to win with those two leading it.  

I think the reason we aren't getting more respect is because nobody really knows what to expect from us.  They know we have a good defense and that our receiving corps should be better, but they're not sure about our OL and don't know which Cam will show up.  Once the OL shows they are legit (which I think they will) and Cam shows that he can be consistent with good protection (which I have no doubt he will), I honestly believe people will start jumping on our bandwagon. After all, it's about the QB.  Look at every trendy pick, and every one of them has a QB that is considered elite.  And because of Cam's inconsistencies, he's not seen as elite...close, but not quite elite, yet.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You would be silly to overlook any team in our division. I'm not.

Regardless of how shitty the division was last year, these teams generally play each other hard.

Even as badly as we beat the Saints, and Falcons in December, we still split with them.

youre saying we will split with a team that we creamed while playing our best football of the year? a team that got much worse over the offseason? whereas our team has gotten significantly better at many key positions?

not being a jerk. just would like you to defend your argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Homerism prevents most people from seeing the parity that is built into the NFL.  Between the draft and the salary cap, no team is ever more than a year or two from turning things around (typically).  The Saints are probably a 6 to 8 win team, which is where I want them.  I hope no team in the South ever goes 0-16...#1 overall picks have a funny way of changing a team although I do think TB wasted theirs on Winston.

The formula is supposed to be, win your home games and split the away games...12-4.  I don't care where the wins come from, just win the South.  Everybody else can pound sand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

youre saying we will split with a team that we creamed while playing our best football of the year? a team that got much worse over the offseason? whereas our team has gotten significantly better at many key positions?

not being a jerk. just would like you to defend your argument.

 

he's not saying that's his prediction for next year, he's saying that's what happened last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Homerism prevents most people from seeing the parity that is built into the NFL.  Between the draft and the salary cap, no team is ever more than a year or two from turning things around (typically).  The Saints are probably a 6 to 8 win team, which is where I want them.  I hope no team in the South ever goes 0-16...#1 overall picks have a funny way of changing a team although I do think TB wasted theirs on Winston.

The formula is supposed to be, win your home games and split the away games...12-4.  I don't care where the wins come from, just win the South.  Everybody else can pound sand.

The ironic thing is that most think the NFCS sucks because nobody had a winning record last year, but I actually think we still can have one of the best divisions in football.  As you say, homerism blinds people to the truth.  So it's easy to say NO or Atlanta sucks because they are our rivals.  But the truth is that both teams have a lot of talent and are real threats.  I believe we are better than both, but we cannot take either lightly. 

Every team in our division had issues last year that caused them to play down from their talent level.  NO got healthy and should be more well-rounded, and Atlanta added some quality talent and fixed their biggest problem which was coaching.  TB won't be horrible either, but I think they still have too many holes to be considered a serious threat to the division.  Barring injury, I expect us to win the division again, but it won't be a cake walk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as Drew Brees is their quarterback they will he a factor period.  Even if he is on the downside (which I don't totally buy) he is still a top 5-10 QB in the NFL.

The big question is how much does their losses hurt them, or do they help them by addition by subtraction.  That is an unknown.  When we benched or released our veterans last year it was a plus for us.

As long as Brees is healthy and behind center they will he a factor IMO, but I think we are a more well rounded team.

I think ATL and TB will be the ones looking up in the NFCS when the smoke clears.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the decline of Drew Brees is WAY overblown here. The dude is still a great QB and anyone who says otherwise is delusional. Because they have him, they are automatically a contender. I personally think they are our biggest competition from the division next year. They get a lot of injured guys back on Defense which was their biggest issue next year. I think Losing Graham is a big problem for them because he was such a matchup nightmare, but I think they are going to be alright offensively with Breesus at the helm. 

Having said that, in a few years that team is going to poo the bed. They have too much money tied up all over their roster and I don't see how they can get past the cap hell without taking some steps back like we did. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So....Jeremy recently wrote an article about our rival, the New Orleans Saints, and basically suggested that the Saints will compete for the cellar of the NFC South this year. Meanwhile, two of four NFC South beat writers think the Saints will win the division. Granted, two of them also picked the Panthers to make the playoffs somehow. But this is indicative of the sports media. many many pundits seem to want to pick the Saints to challenge for the division title, despite an aging quarterback and significant free agency losses at multiple, integral positions (positions that were only really filled by rookie draftees). I will admit that i have thus far written off the Saints as cellar dwellers. But, amongst the cacaphony of dissenting voices, i am beginning to doubt that the Saints will be as bad as we Panther fans want them to be.

Here's the question... are we overlooking the Saints? did they really sink as far as we hope they did, or are we letting our electric blue glasses color our perception of our rival? I wont steal Jeremy's thunder by asking the same question he did. my perception of my fellow fans is that we may have overlooked our rival. 

what are your thoughts Huddle? 

I said it before NFC south is going to be one of the better division.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is something that has irritated me for a while. I'm going to address his play during these "game winning drives," 8 of them apparently, clear up some nomenclature, and address some points specifically. The games in question.  Also responding to this  What is a Game Winning Drive? This is an undefined term and therefore can be whatever the person using it wants it to be. The term itself removes context from a result which lends itself to be used by people arguing in bad faith. Some people like to attribute every time Bryce is on the field in a situation like this to him "winning the game," or just kind of associating him with a "Game Winning Drive" and leaving it open ended. There's no criteria for what a GWD is. If you had a spectrum of what this could encompass it, on one end you'd have a single player being responsible, and on the other you'd have all 11. Put another way, a QB going 9/9 for 99 yards and rushing the final yard himself is on one end of the spectrum, and on the other is the blocking tight end who was just kinda there. Hey, he was on the field too.  For these purposes, I'm going to hedge and say a GWD is something you know when you see it. I'm not going to claim Bryce hasn't had one, but I'm absolutely not going to give him credit for every one of them. Reasonable people can disagree at the margins, but generally I think we'll be in accord more than not. I also want to look at the context of these, because I think we need to keep in mind how the team got to that position. There's a certain "mystique" about the term game winning drive. Like all of a sudden, when the game is on the line, the QB just turns it on and becomes a better player and blah blah blah. Nothing else matters because he Just Wins Games It neatly ignores the circumstances that led to a team needing a last second drive against some of the worst teams in the league, and this should be taken into consideration. This was an argument made in favor of Delhomme for years...until a certain game that we won't mention.  In reality, defenses are tired by the end of the game, defensive coordinators will generally give up yards in exchange for clock, and offensive playcallers will be more aggressive. That's really it.  But Fiz, why now? Why tonight? People are building this narrative about Bryce Young because it allows them to overlook the rest of his performance, his role in getting the team into whatever hole they're trying to crawl out of, and minimizing the contributions of everyone else (or assigning blame to players other than him) to make him look like he's better than he is/being let down. People in the national media with motivations I can only speculate on are doing this and it's irritating. Also it's very slow at work tonight and it's either this or reruns of ER.  I'll be looking at the final drives here (more or less) when the Panthers were in a position to win or tie. I'll also be adding some context as a I go. So lets just look at these.  2023 Houston at Carolina - 5/10 41 yds, FG  The Panthers drove to the Houston 44, then ran it 6 times in a row for the final 12 yards before the Texans started diving offsides. Panthers weren't just killing clock; Bryce had already taken one sack on the drive (six on the day!), and I don't think any of us feel like Pineiro had a 60 yarder in him in 2023. He did have 5 FG in him though, which is all the scoring the Panthers could muster. It was enough.  Game Winning Drive: eh, Bryce didn't really cover himself in glory here. If you think getting the team into range for a 60 yard attempt before letting the RB finish the job is a GWD, then we're going to have some problems. I'm generally kinda dubious of the whole "wow he set up a long range field goal for the win what a legend." Why yes early career Tom Brady was a fraud carried by Adam Vinatieri why do you ask  Atlanta at Carolina - 5/6 53 yds, GW FG Game Winning Drive: yeah, I think so. It was a miserable 9-6 win against the Desmond Ridder led Atlanta Falcons. Prior to this final drive, Bryce was a whopping 13/18 for 114 yds and the offense had managed 6 whole points. Hard for me to say here they weren't in the position to need a GWD because of how ineffective Bryce was. That said, I think it's fair he did this one on his own. Credit where credit's due little guy, you did it.  2024 New Orleans at Carolina - 1/4, 38 yds Game Winning Drive: not really. Panthers win 23-22. Sanders scored from 16 yards out on the ground, Carolina was only there because of a DPI (a theme with Bryce), Bryce took a sack on the 2 point conversion, and then the defense stopped the Saints afterwards. Prior to this Bryce had a very Bryce esque 15/22 133 1 Td 1 Int performance going so he was just kinda there.  Again, this is where context comes into play. Completing 1/4 passes does not "leading a game winning drive" make. If that's the dividing line, everyone on the field led a GWD, so the term becomes meaningless.  Carolina at Giants - 0/0  Game Winning Drive: no matter what a GWD is, it's certainly not this, and if anyone argues differently you can disregard them. Daniel Jones fumbled on the first play of overtime, Panthers ran a couple times and kicked the game winning FG. Prior to this, Bryce was terrible. Panthers were up 17-7 with 5:31 in the 3rd quarter, on the back of Chuba. From that point on, Bryce went 2/6 for 14 yards. Panthers had two 3 and outs and got just 2 first downs. Panthers overcame him here.  Arizona at Carolina - 0/0 Game Winning Drive: no. On the panthers second possession in overtime, Chuba ran it twice for 49 yards and a TD. On their first possession, Bryce completed a 1 yard checkdown, took a sack, and the Panthers punted after totaling -4 yards. Furthermore, Bryce couldn't convert a 3rd and 3 at the 2 minute warning up 3 points. Arizona got the ball back and tied the game.  Carolina at Atlanta - 5/5, 71 yards  Game Winning Drive: sure whatever have a day. For context, it's generally accepted in Atlanta sports media the defense was trying get the coordinator fired that day, which he was. I was at the game. I'm not saying the players had a conspiracy, but I'm not sure how it would look different if they did. but hey, as long as weird poo keeps happening against the Falcons, let it ride.  Miami at Carolina - 3/5, 45 yards, TD  Game Winning Drive: yes BUT. I don't want to re-litigate this. Briefly, the Dolphins have a historically bad defense, the Panthers were only trailing because of how badly Bryce played, the defense bailed the team out, and Rico was clearly the MVP. Trying to sneak this into a narrative about Bryce and his game winning drives is an attempt to hide how completely dogshit he was for most of the game. On second half drives to start, Bryce went.... 0/1 passing, took a sack, FG 2/3 passing, 18 yards, Delay of Game on Bryce, punt 2/2 passing, 16 yards, took a sack, punt  1/3 passing, 4 yards, punt  1/1 passing, 4 yds, 2 defensive penalties, 43 yd run by Rico, 1 yd TD run Absolutely dismal performance Dallas at Carolina - 3/6, 25 yards, FG  Game Winning Drive: Panthers had 34 yards rushing on this drive, and Rico rushed for more yards on the day than Bryce threw. People will want to point to the 7 yard slant to Renfrow, but that's one moment. Why do you need a 4th down conversion to kick a game winning FG against the worst defense in the league? The Renfrow catch is just as meaningful as the DPI (again) on 3rd and 7. Hard for me to say yeah Bryce gets credit for this and Rico doesn't. or Ryan Fitzgerald. People aren't going to be telling stories about where they were when Bryce got 25 yards passing to set up a 30 yard FG to beat the worst defense in the league.  Conclusion I'd say low end 3, high end 6 for what I'd actually credit Bryce for with having a game winning drive. Absolutely not for the Giants and Cardinals game. Saints game probably not.  As far as questioning which games need a GWD because of Bryce, I'd argue Miami, New York, 2023 Atlanta, and Houston definitely. League average QB play and you don't need the heroics. Bryce had multiple chances to seal the game against the Cardinals in 2024 and couldn't do it. The defense picked off the Cardinals late in the 4th quarter at their 11 yard line after the Panthers went 3 and out, including a classic Bryce check down short of the line to gain on 3rd.  About half of the time, it looks like these GWD, whomever is responsible for them, are happening in part because of what Bryce did or didn't do. I don't think league average QB play is too much to ask for. Panthers usually win these games despite of Bryce; he's an obstacle to be overcome.  Stats Taken in totality, in these situations Bryce's stats are  7 games 17/26 passing for 233, 1 TD  65% completion rating  13 ypc 8.9 ypa I'm not going to compare this to league average, I'm just going to point out you'd expect someone with 8 GWD to have more than 1 TD.  Other side of this  but what about the games in a similar situation where they DIDN'T win? Shouldn't we look at those games too? Maybe find ones where Bryce absolutely lost the game with a pick, or calling an audible into the wrong play, or spiking the ball with zero seconds on the clock after throwing into the middle of the field, or all of the turnover on downs? Maybe also go into some of the games that have been mythologized, like the Eagles game that ended on a turnover on downs where Bryce had 3rd and 4 in Eagles territory and couldn't get a first down? Yeah...someone should do that...
    • Best RB tandem in Panther history (at least for a few weeks)
×
×
  • Create New...