Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Seahawks offer Wilson $21M/year but Wilson wants more


pantherking15

Recommended Posts

With six days to go until the artificial (but very real) deadline for pulling the plug on contract talks between the Seahawks and quarterback Russell Wilson, it’s still unclear whether a deal will get done.

The two sides have opted for silence regarding any discussions that are occurring. Word on the NFL grapevine is that the Seahawks have offered a package worth nearly $21 million per year, with significant guaranteed money. Whatever the current offer, Wilson, through agent Mark Rodgers, wants more.

The current high-water mark remains at $22 million per year, the new-money average given to Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers in 2013. The Seahawks currently don’t want to exceed that number.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/07/25/seahawks-russell-wilson-moving-toward-deadline/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can maintain a Super Bowl contending roster while paying your stars big money. You need to draft really well and consistently well.

Noteworthy Seahawks drafted prospects 2010 - 2012: Russell Okung, Earl Thomas, Golden Tate, Walter Thurmond, Kam Chancellor, KJ Wright, Richard Sherman, Byron Maxwell, Malcolm Smith, Bruce Irvin, Bobby Wagner, Russell Wilson, Robert Turbin, Jeremy Lane, JR Sweezy

It's like our 2014 draft multiplied by 3. And the majority of these guys were on dirt cheap contracts. The Seahawks 2013 and 2014 drafts are nowhere near that caliber and I wasn't particularly impressed with their 2015 draft, besides Tyler Lockett. Combine this with stars getting paid big money and Marshawn Lynch turning 29 this year (only 1-2 years of elite play left). Seahawks will still be a force, but they won't be that overwhelmingly dominant force anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Seahawks have not drafted that well in the last two years. If they want to pay Wilson 21-22m, they're gonna have to step it up.

A house of cards.  They will have gone all 5 years post-new-CBA without taking advantage of the free gift of a 1st round talent for 5th year option.  Carpenter/Jets, Irvin/no offer, 2013/Harvin, 2014/ trade back for Paul Richardson who's worse than Corey Brown, and Graham who'll be a goner after maybe a couple seasons.  Their top pick this year is a felon who was off most boards, and they gave up draft capital equal to the #27 overall pick for Lockett.  There is open dissension with guys like Bennett and Sherman/Chancellor/Thomas are all recovering from injuries.  

And we don't? Kuechly, Short, Lotulelei, Norman, Alexander, etc....

Not as soon as they do.  Theirs just ended their rookie deals and ours still have time.  The ONLY guarantee in CLT is Cam and Luke IMO.  You gotta have a drafting fool like we do with GMan.  Whiffs or off years will happen, but they've had three straight stinkers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i like wilson a lot and i don't really blame him for wanting to get paid. i get his thought process: he wants to be compensated for what he did in the past (the superbowl INT and the 4 INT game are not indicative of his overall performances) since he was a 3rd round pick and for what he will do in the future.

 

BUT

 

turning down 21 million a year is fuging ridiculous.

I wouldn't be surprised if they let him walk. Seahawks management are not dumb dumbs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And we don't? Kuechly, Short, Lotulelei, Norman, Alexander, etc....

There's a big difference between us and the Seahawks regarding cap space.

We have been steadily climbing our way out of salary cap hell the past 3 years. The Seahawks have been in good cap health. We had $19M in dead money in 2014 and $12M dead money this year. The space we get back from the dead money will cover 3-4 of those guys.

It will also help big time not having to pay CJ $20M, Kalil $11.8M, and Stewart $8.3M like we have to this year. The Seahawks aren't getting that type of cap relief in the near future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So? Cam's contract is heavily front loaded to offset that. Seattle can just back load Wilson's so they have money to pay guys right now.

Just because Hurney got drunk and threw money around doesn't mean every other team is gonna get screwed.

Like hell they can.  FYI, Sherman, Thomas, Chancellor, Wright, and Avril are already signed through 2018/2019.  All deals but Sherman's are backloaded and his cap hit the last two years of that deal will still be 13/14 per year.  Russ also wants an ungodly amount of guaranteed money.  Something has to give.  Sheer talent alone might keep them in the mix this year but football is also about chemistry and theirs feels amiss at the moment for countless reasons.  Long term, you simply cannot have 5 straight drafts with no first rounder contributing long term, three straight stinker drafts overall, and an overrated QB hell bent on breaking the bank and still expect to keep rolling.  Cannot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No it won't, but he isn't worth that kind of money.

they won't be able to pay everyone that makes that team look so good. part of their success has been in only having to pay chump change to their quarterback and spread those millions elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...