Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reggie Wayne?


tukafan21

Recommended Posts

If KB has a significant injury, am I the only one who would love to see us bring Wayne in?

Much better than Welker and think he would be a great PERSON to add to our WR corps.  He is very much a leader and still has some game left to him, I think he would be great for Cam to learn from too seeing as he spent all those years with Manning and learning from him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be opposed, but he would be more of a Cotch type signing than anything else. Fact of the matter is, there is no one on the open market with the level of KB's talent. 

 

I think I'd rather just throw Funch into the #1 WR role and roll with the growing pains. Will help him immensely next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly I don't want him. If it's bad, I would love to see a few of the young guys get a shot.  Next man up mentality. These kids are hungry for a chance. I just hope KB is fine 

The problem is we don't have another #1 to step into the role.

We can't be replacing KB with Byrd or Boykin in the active roster.

Funchess, Cotchery, Brown, Ginn, Bersin, Byrd/Boykin just isn't enough firepower as there is no true #1 there, and if Funchess is considered the #1, I don't think we have a #2 in that group either.  It's a bunch of #3 guys with Funchess being a wildcard right now.

I'd be much more comfortable with Wayne and Funchess as our 1 and 2 than Funchess and any of the other WRs currently on the roster.  We'll still need others to step up even with someone like Wayne, but to expect Brown/Ginn/Cotchery to replace KB's production would be absurd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is we don't have another #1 to step into the role.

We can't be replacing KB with Byrd or Boykin in the active roster.

Funchess, Cotchery, Brown, Ginn, Bersin, Byrd/Boykin just isn't enough firepower as there is no true #1 there, and if Funchess is considered the #1, I don't think we have a #2 in that group either.  It's a bunch of #3 guys with Funchess being a wildcard right now.

I'd be much more comfortable with Wayne and Funchess as our 1 and 2 than Funchess and any of the other WRs currently on the roster.  We'll still need others to step up even with someone like Wayne, but to expect Brown/Ginn/Cotchery to replace KB's production would be absurd.

He'll be 37 in November.  He's not a #1 or #2 any more.  Just as well off with Cotch at this point in their careers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point in his career he's still a steady receiver and could do a good job for any team looking for a complimentary option, but he's no longer the leading guy on a team. Then again, we wouldn't really need that from him because our receiving options would include: Olsen (TE), Funchess, Ginn, Cotchery, Corey, Bersin, Boykin, and Byrd. Now one might argue that some of those options aren't that appealing, but I would argue that this would be the opportunity for them to step up in a big way and prove their worth to this team. After all, Funchess was drafted to become a big time receiver for this team, and guys like Corey and Bersin will want to establish themselves as solid #3 and #4 options on the depth chart. So adding Reggie Wayne wouldn't be in the hope that he recaptures his glory days, rather we would want him to brings his vast experience, his ability to make important catches, and his winning mentality to this team. Even at this point in his career a healthy Reggie Wayne would be a useful weapon for Cam. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is we don't have another #1 to step into the role.

We can't be replacing KB with Byrd or Boykin in the active roster.

Funchess, Cotchery, Brown, Ginn, Bersin, Byrd/Boykin just isn't enough firepower as there is no true #1 there, and if Funchess is considered the #1, I don't think we have a #2 in that group either.  It's a bunch of #3 guys with Funchess being a wildcard right now.

I'd be much more comfortable with Wayne and Funchess as our 1 and 2 than Funchess and any of the other WRs currently on the roster.  We'll still need others to step up even with someone like Wayne, but to expect Brown/Ginn/Cotchery to replace KB's production would be absurd.

I totally get what you are saying but I think we get caught up with the terms #1 and #2 receivers. The last two Super Bowl champs won with receivers by committee. I do agree that KBs production will be missed. I'm just not a big fan of signing an old receiver who may not be better than anyone on the roster. We still have Olsen as well. I just don't think it's all doom and gloom like everyone is putting it. We still have cam who has a few familiar faces out there and he trust plus a stingy defense. We wil be fine I believe 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly I don't want him. If it's bad, I would love to see a few of the young guys get a shot.  Next man up mentality. These kids are hungry for a chance. I just hope KB is fine 

The young guys getting a shot is great in theory, but I'll trust Gman and the gang to evaluate the situation and make the appropriate decision based upon their experience and knowledge of the personnel.  In other words, if they bring someone in, it's probably because it's necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...